This
Week in Barrons – 10-19-2014:
Deflation – Inflation – What does it matter?
Dear
Ms. Yellen:
I only have a couple
questions this week?
#1: Ms. Yellen, why do you hate
deflation? Can’t we forget trying to manufacture 2% inflation and simply let
the market decide what's best? After
all, Wal-Mart is our nation’s largest employer and is also the leader in low
prices – and yet they don’t seem to go out of business. And I’ve never heard someone say: “I wish that
product would go up in price so that I could buy it.” The theory with ‘deflation’ is that if you
know prices are going to fall, you will delay your purchases, and the economy will
come to a screeching halt. But that
doesn’t seem to make any sense to me.
Isn’t it gigantic ‘SALE’ signs that pack stores and showrooms? People don't delay their purchases waiting on
lower prices, but rather flock toward lower prices. Also, in emergency situations nobody puts off
replacing a water heater, a tire, or a refrigerator until ‘next year’ because
it could be cheaper. In fact,
electronics are notorious for coming out high and watching prices fall. And despite knowing prices will fall, people still
camp out for 3 weeks on sidewalks to get the newest iPhone. Your own FED
economists have said: “The only episode in which we find evidence of a link
between deflation and depression is the Great Depression (1929-34). We find
virtually no evidence of such a link in any other period. In a broad historical context, beyond the
Great Depression, the notion that deflation and depression are linked virtually
disappears.” So if deflation isn’t the ‘kiss of death’ – then why not allow consumers
to get more value, buy more products, and spur more investment for expansion, by
eliminating your goal of 2% inflation?
#2 Ms. Yellen, a friend of mine MW has prepared the chart
below. It tries to simplify a lot of
economic factors comparing the West to the BRIC’s (Brazil, Russia, India and
China):
I realize
that this is a very simplified view, but generally it appears that the U.S. is
in trouble on virtually all fronts. When
I look at the BRIC economies, I see increasing wages and jobs, and decreasing
unemployment and debt. And after the
West has pumped trillions of dollars into their economies, I continue to see a weak
job market, European double-digit unemployment rates, and a contaction in
full-time jobs (as jobs that are being created are part-time in order to avoid
Obamacare). Are the BRIC’s just lucky,
or is avoiding bail-outs, free money and increased entitlement programs – the
way to go? I realize that your QE
programs were designed to stop individuals and businesses from failing. Government programs rarely address the cause,
and frequently just treat the symptoms of an ailing economy. I have seen the best intended Government
programs slowly move from being short-term boosts, to long-term entitlements. I’m scared that we are beginning to breed a generation
that believes that they are ‘entitled’ and often ‘reliant’ upon government handouts. This behavior destroys real businesses, keeps
the poor – poor, drains public coffers, eliminates competition, and ultimately
steals an individual’s pride, self-respect, accountability and
responsibility. To that degree I urge you to DISCONTINUE QE – and allow
the chips to fall where they may!
The Market:
-
The Russell 2000 index of small-cap stocks remains one of the
best indicators of general market order-flow. Earlier this week the Russell’s decline slowed,
built support and began to rally as the other indices continued to see
volatility.
-
The Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the European Central Bank (ECB) are
ramping up their QE policies and lowering rates even further. This is exactly opposite of what our FED
would like – as it will force wider deflation and trade deficits.
-
The bond market is pricing in that low rates are here to stay. The 10-year yield has fallen to 2%, and I
think we could see 1.6 to 1.8%. If the
bond market believed that the FED was actually going to raise rates, end
accommodation, and unwind their balance sheet – we should be seeing rates rise to
3%.
-
The
energy sector (XLE) is down more than 20% and funds that have been invested in the
energy sector are imploding right and left. When a fund unravels, a large
amount of forced selling hits the market. This is the equivalent of an
investor getting a margin call, but on a much larger scale.
-
This week the bond market spiked over 5 full points, and the VIX
(volatility index) spiked its highest levels in 3 years.
-
This week the S&P and NASDAQ touched the 10% correction mark
for the first time in 3 years. Typically
corrections will last 9 to 20 months, and will fall between 10% and 30%.
Fair Warning: this just turned from being an ‘investors’ market to a ‘traders’
market – virtually overnight.
-
This week Retail
sales reports missed their estimates, and Germany came out and cut its GDP
outlook for both 2014 and 2015.
-
This week the
NFIB small business outlook missed their estimates and lowered forward guidance.
-
The Ebola
outbreak could cause a crash in the economy, as virtually no one will travel or
even go into a mall where coughing and sneezing are prevalent.
-
Finally, the dollar rally has had a significant consumer benefit.
Oil and gasoline prices are down, and
the rise in food prices has slowed. The
strong dollar is like giving someone a tax cut.
This will certainly help boost confidence among consumers heading into
the mid-term elections, and right now the Democrats need all the help they can
get.
So the real question is: Can
the market hold up and even rise, in the face of failing economic reports, and
no new QE? I say no. I think we
can see a range forming where we bounce and put in lower highs. We then fall a little more and bounce to a
lower high, and on and on. I see a stair step lower without some form of
renewed action from the Feds. Frankly I
don’t see an easy, safe, and smooth exit from our long-term zero interest rate
and accommodative policy.
The FED is very concerned
about the dollar rising and the impact it will have on GDP, corporate growth,
and earnings. The other interest rate issues
involve the massive amount of borrowers (not just the Federal government) that
will have difficulty paying higher interest rates. Higher U.S. interest rates could trickle over
to stall emerging markets and BRIC growth, as the U.S. has been a massive
lender to the booming emerging markets.
I think the FED will try
and talk us higher, and yet resist doing anything; therefore, expect a lot more
chop and slop over the next several weeks. I’m hearing with more and more
frequency that more FED money will solve all of our problems. For example, I’m hearing that “our schools
need MORE money.” I am not sure at what
point J.Q. Public realizes that MONEY is not the magic answer that solves ALL
problems, but rather just ‘papers over them’ until tomorrow.
Tips:
I think it
is pre-mature to think that the Fed is going to change course. I think we are experiencing a similar market
reaction to the ending of QE1 and QE2. The
FED may ride to the rescue in support of the mid-term elections; however, (due
to their lack of credibility) it will need to be under the guise of a national
disaster – such as Ebola. If that were
to be the case, then I would NOT fight the FED.
This stock market still has enough faith in the Fed that more QE and
zero interest rates will keep this market moving higher a little longer –
before the REAL bubble bursts.
At this
point all of the indexes have broken through their 200-Day moving averages - which
is a big red flag. The Eurozone is continuing to weaken, but sentiment may
be changing soon as the ECB meets on NOV 6th. I expect
that some form of European QE will be discussed, and this should really help
firm up both European and U.S. markets.
I still
think that the only way to make money in this market is to put and call credit
spreads in order to collect premium.
This coming week we have another 25% of the S&P companies reporting
earnings – including AAPL, LMT, and PII. I do not want to call the
bottom here as we will likely see more volatility, but I do want to start
looking for some bargains in the carnage.
My current list of potential candidates is as follows: CME, CBOE, ICE, WYNN,
TEX, HOG, SLW, IYT, TRV, FDX, UTX. In
the energy sector I’m watching HERO, XLE, UPL and am watching PAA, KMI, EEP in
the MLP space. I still like the biotech sector as well with names such as
VRTX, AMGN, REGN, and IBB.
My
current short-term ‘Larger-Cap’ holds
are:
-
KO (Beverage) – in @ $41.17 – (currently $42.68),
My short-tem
‘Small-Caps’ holds are:
-
IG – in @ $7.27 – (currently $8.87),
To
follow me on Twitter and on StockTwits to get my daily thoughts and trades – my
handle is: taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author,
R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com>
to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
<rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
No comments:
Post a Comment