This Week in Barrons – 12-31-2017:
“This way of thinking causes an effect that will take years to reverse.” Betsy DeVos … Secretary of Education
I’m the first to admit that history is the best judge of a philosophy, but that entire ‘participation trophy’ thing stunk from the get-go. Now, the numbers are confirming it:
- A Hudson Institute report noted that jobs added by start-up companies are down from 3m in 1990 to 2.3m in 2010, and below 1.8m today.
- Since 2009, we're averaging less than 8 start-up jobs per 1000 Americans versus 11 during the Bush and Clinton administrations.
- In 1990, start-up wages made up over 12% of total corporate wages versus less than 8% today.
- Today (per MJP), nonprofits account for 10.3% of all U.S. employment, and by including government workers – 26% of all U.S. workers are NOT concerned about profitability.
- And why should they be – non-profit wages INCREASED 49.2% between 2000 and 2010.
Do you really think it’s coincidence that the decline in start-up jobs occurred at the same time as the rise in non-profits and non-profit wage growth – which was directly in-line with the ‘Participation Trophy’ mentality.
When something goes ‘this wrong’ with start-ups, the first place I look is toward our coaching and management. So, what happened to the basic fabric of our entrepreneurial education to suddenly have us stress mediocrity over superiority? What caused us to go from stressing fundamentals (knowing your numbers) to delivering incubator space and ping-pong tables? After all, every entrepreneur knows that ‘distribution is king’. Ignoring all the hogwash about limited production, and selecting beta groups – everyone knows that ‘distribution is king’ and ‘cash makes no enemies’. But in the late-ninety’s, an entrepreneur’s first question changed from: “What PAIN am I solving for my customer?” to “Where can I get funding for this idea?” We began to put our best opportunities behind a ‘pay-to-play’ wall. The entrepreneur thought he was winning by thinking about money first, but if the Internet taught us anything it was to think about distribution FIRST and money LAST! Now, last is not never – it’s strictly putting the end-user / customer before your banker. The entrepreneur was ‘coached’ into becoming an entertainer who was suddenly afraid of someone stealing their wares. They hid behind a funding wall – scared to say customers and prospects names, talk of profitability, or doing anything too earth-shattering. Well congratulations educators and coaches, you have achieved mediocrity. And you’re propagating that thinking via incubator and accelerator farms. To this day, I’ve never met a start-up entrepreneur whose big issues were finding:
- Office Space,
- Tax Benefits,
- A cheaper, faster, better lawyer and accountant, or
- A way to capitalize on their race, creed, or sex.
The current start-up landscape includes incubators, accelerators, incinerators, and respirators focused on all of those elements. But what I didn’t understand until recently was that the ‘state-affiliated incubators’ get paid on the number of jobs entrepreneurs ‘think’ that they will create versus the actual success of that small business. I know how this movie ends. We now have entrepreneurs that don’t understand:
- Their numbers – until they can’t turn the lights on,
- Their markets – until they are a ‘solution in search of a problem’, and
- Their people and how to lead them – until their people leave.
The accelerator model is trying to solve real production, finance, marketing, and leadership issues with real estate, office space, tax credits, and ping-pong tables.
The part that is fascinating to me is how openly these established organizations are bad-mouthing the ‘crypto-currency’ arena – when in fact it’s the only one that is raising major interest (and dollars) in small amounts of time. The crypto arena does NOT abide by the ‘Participation Trophy’ philosophy. They are producing actual solutions to problems: from micro-loans to complete sector disintermediation to currency substitution. The good news is that crypto-companies are NOT signing up to be a part of these ‘incinerator’ solutions. In fact, when I mentioned an accelerator to several crypto-companies they laughed. After all, why would they need office space when their crypto-teams are scattered from the U.S. (both coasts) to the Far East to the Middle East and throughout Europe (East and West).
In response to the traditional funding sources thumbing their noses at the crypto-arena, they (like true entrepreneurs) invented new sources of capital – Tokens and ICOs. Having lived thru the 1999 era, I saw first-hand brilliant CMU nerds attack the Internet space with a vengeance. Today, although the institutions remain – there are no rumors and no stories. Which tells me that students have abandoned the ‘respirator’ model (that ends with them owning less than 4% of their own company), and have gone ‘old school’. They’re either: (a) partnering with a customer on a solution set, or (b) finding their own path and funding via friends, family, Tokens and ICOs.
It’s time for entrepreneurial education (and the incubator) to re-invent itself and deal less with real estate and more with real content. That will require educators to develop a completely new curriculum. Let the Token / ICO model serve as a warning shot, because traditional ‘respirators’ need to worry that ALL of the good ideas will circumvent their real-estate and ping-pong tables – in favor of today’s knowledge and real mentorship. After all, giving every ‘incubatee’ 7 minutes of fame during a Demo Day is like giving a 10-year-old a ‘Participation Trophy’. It penalizes the top prospects – that did work hard, and put in the time.
But who can blame the current educators / ‘incinerator’ managers – because life is good. They are being paid top-notch, non-profit wages for:
- 20-year-old jokes and power-points,
- Non-profit (no numbers) performance, and
- For headlines, rather than bottom lines.
The Tokens / ICO funding route flies directly in the face of today’s ‘Participation Trophy’ driven model – and only one will survive. I’m betting on the crypto-entrepreneur to sort it out. They’re paving the way forward, but beware:
- There are no participation trophies,
- There are no demo days,
- It’s about sales and knowing your numbers,
- It’s about winning and owning your niche,
- It’s not for everyone – and it really never was anyway.
“To Infinity … and Beyond” … Buzz Lightyear - Toy Story
Remember 2017 when:
- Serena Williams won the grand slam while pregnant,
- Equifax sang: “Baby got hacked,'
- The net was deemed no longer neutral,
- The word ‘bitcoin’ was Google’s top search term,
- J.Q. Public could no longer afford 1 bitcoin or an iPhone X,
- The U.S. Dollar had its worst year since 2003, while bitcoin was up 1,350%,
- #MeToo and #TakeAKnee took off in a big ways,
- Trump said ‘au revoir’ to the Paris deal & TPP, and put DACA, NAFTA, and Iran on notice,
- M. Flynn resigned, J. Sessions recused, J. Comey left, and J. Kushner explained,
- Wouldn’t it have been nice if hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria could have doused the flames in California and Oregon,
- To Amazon, it’s a ‘Prime’ world and we’re all just living in it,
- Venezuela turned to bitcoin to solve its economic crisis,
- Global stock markets grew by $12.4T, with Argentina and Turkey setting the pace with increases of 77% and 48% respectively,
- The Catalan people started singing: “Should I stay or should I go?”,
- Las Vegas regained the world’s deadliest shooting title – and Congress didn’t do a darn thing about it,
- Holiday sales increased by 4.9%, and online shopping was up 18.1%,
- Sexual harassment, stolen trade secrets, and a CEO losing his job = #DeleteUber,
- Disney dated FOX, CVS courted Aetna, and AT&T tried to marry Time Warner, and
- The Nobel Peace Prize went to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons – as N. Korea told us they ‘were just getting started’.
When experts were asked: “What would it take for this bull market to end?” They responded:
Jim Fink: Bull markets are nurtured by low inflation, low interest rates, and high profitability. A spike in energy prices would trigger higher inflation and cause corporate profits to plunge. Hostilities in the Middle East could push China into an economic recession – resulting in global stagflation and the worst energy-induced bear market since 1974.
Ari Charney: The world's central banks are beginning to take away their easy-money policies that have helped inflate financial assets. Policymakers never figured out why the global economy has remained this weak for so long – which makes me suspicious of their sudden optimism about a synchronized expansion.
Linda McDonough: Decreased trade via tariffs, taxes, and a focus on domestic manufacturing will increase inflation. Higher trade barriers and interest rate hikes are a natural recipe for disaster.
Scott Chan: Fear of a recession (caused by slowing China growth) will naturally propagate weakness throughout the stock market.
John Persinos: The stock market is pricier now than in 1929 and in 2007. Low interest rates have spawned bubbles in stocks, bonds and housing. The FED, ECB, and the Bank of Japan are beginning to shrink their balance sheets. It’s doubtful that they will get it right.
4 Investment ideas for the New Year:
Logistics companies like FedEx (FDX) and United Parcel (UPS) are once again in their busiest months of the year. According to the National Retail Federation, the heavy rise in shipments, in and around the holiday season, are primarily attributable to the rise in global e-commerce. E-commerce grew by over 10% in 2017 – more than double the overall retail increase. This staggering growth in e-commerce is expected to be maintained over the next few years – virtually guaranteeing FDX and UPS a place in most investment portfolios. A third shipping stock that has a bright future is XPO Logistics (XPO). It’s about 1/6th the size of FedEx and 1/10th the size of UPS; however, the company has about 10,000 contracts with owner-operators. I think XPO (which specializes in shipping and delivering big and bulky packages) has the greatest potential of all three shippers over the next year. Especially since 2 weeks ago rumors began circulating that Home Depot (HD) was interested in acquiring XPO. It was also rumored that Amazon.com (AMZN) was considering making an offer. The XPO advantage lies with its 10,000 independent carriers, and surrounding its ability to deliver and set-up large, bulky packages such as appliances and electronics (think 70” TVs).
Another company worth considering is Xoma (XOMA), which is focused on the discovery, development and licensing of therapeutic antibodies. XOMA has been on an upward trajectory since August following the signing of licensing agreements with Novartis for gevokizumab and the use of its IL-1 beta targeting antibodies in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. XOMA stands to earn significant milestone payments and tiered royalties on sales of gevokizumab. In 2017, XOMA's shares were up 743.60%, and positioned for increased growth.
Sangamo Therapeutics (SGMO) is a clinical-stage biotech company focused on genomic therapies using genome editing, gene therapy, gene regulation and cell therapy. SGMO entered into an agreement with Pfizer (PFE) for the development and commercialization of gene therapy programs for hemophilia. Prospects for the company are good with shares up by 450% alone last year.Dynavax Technologies (DVAX) is a commercial-stage biopharma company focused on the discovery and development of novel vaccines and immuno-oncology therapeutics. DVAX shot up in July following a favorable recommendation from the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee for Heplisav-B, a vaccine for immunization against the Hepatitis B infection in adults. Heplisav-B is the first FDA-approved product from Dynavax. The vaccine is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2018. The stock price was up by 373% last year. The regulatory action makes Heplisav-B the first new Hepatitis B vaccine in the U.S. in more than 25 years, and the only two-dose Hepatitis B vaccine for adults.
This year’s rally has been relentless – putting most of the big ETFs and stocks at almost 2-standard deviation levels. But it was the first time since 2012 that international stock exchanges outperformed the U.S. This coming week brings in the ‘January Effect’. The effect is a seasonal increase in stock prices during the month of January. Analysts generally attribute this rally to an increase in buying, which follows a drop in prices that typically happens in December when investors (engaged in tax-loss selling) prompt a sell-off. Another possible explanation for the January rally is that investors use year-end cash bonuses to purchase investments the following month.
I've seen some powerful January rallies, and those that rolled right over. This one has the ability to do either. The market has just had an incredible 20% run – on top of rising for most of the last 8 years. History tells us that trees don't grow to the moon, and markets don't rise forever. There could be a ton of investors that are just hoping the market holds up into January, and then take profits. Because if you took profits last week, you would need to pay those taxes in April of 2018, but if you waited until this coming week – you wouldn’t see the tax man until 2019. So, I can make a case that there will be people taking some ‘off the table’ in January. But then again, a lot of large institutional investing is done on an annual basis. If you're a pension fund and you just closed out 2017, you will likely inject a ton of your new year’s cash right into stocks.
And this year we have the added benefit of a new corporate tax plan paving the way for higher business profits. As much as valuations are stretched with high P/E (stock price to earnings) ratios, if corporations can increase their ‘E’ (earnings) – then their ‘P’ will indeed go higher. My guess is that this market finally runs into trouble sometime around mid-February. Let’s not forget N. Korea. There’s a ton of military chatter out there about ‘war’. I would NOT be surprised if shortly following the Olympics in South Korea, some form of military event takes place that could rattle the markets.
And this year our FED is reversing its 30-year old policy of adding liquidity to markets. By the end of 2018, the Fed says it will be draining about $600B a year from the U.S. money supply. Therefore:
- Instead of lowering interest rates, our FED will be pushing them higher,
- And instead of supporting the stock market as the world’s #1 Buyer, it will become the world’s #1 Seller.
Be careful out there.
In 2017, cryptocurrencies have generated wealth like no other asset class. While Bitcoin has garnered most of the attention, there have been hundreds of other winners. Ethereum was the second leading currency; however, within the past two weeks Ripple has skyrocketed from a low of $0.22 on Dec. 10 – to a high of $2.47. That’s 1,024% within a 20-day span. As a result, Ripple has now overtaken Ethereum as the 2nd most valuable currency by market cap. Nick Colas, one of the first Wall Street analysts to cover Bitcoin, believes that 2018 will see a surge in volatility in the crypto-arena – with about 40% failures. If that happens, crypto-market knowledge and timing become much more important. A buy and hold strategy, similar to 2017, might not be the best way to trade.
Bullish: (Sell PCS = Sell a Put Credit Spread)
- Aurora – ACBFF (7.63) – Long Stock from $2 / share,
- GST (1.05) – Long Stock from $1 / share,
- ABT (57.05) – Sell PCS – Jan 19th: - 57 / +55, $0.62,
- ABBV (96.71) – Sell PCS – Jan 19th: -95 / +92.5, $0.66, and
- UNH (220.46) – Sell PCS – Jan 12th: -222.5 / + 220, $1.38
- Be on the lookout for any of the following being added to Coinbase exchange: XRP, DASH, IOT, QTUM, OMG, NEO, STRAT, and WAVES.
- BTC ($13,080) I did not expect this strong of a pullback. If it remains below its 50-day EMA – its target is $5,745. I expect $10,705 and $8,000 to be support on the way down. No trade.
- ETH ($724) The 20-day EMA has been broken, and I suspect we will test the $646 level of support and maybe $600 below that. ETH becomes positive above $770. Between the 20-day EMA and $760, we are likely to witness a volatile range-bound trading action. No trade.
- XRP ($2.29) Ripple roared past $1.5, reaching an intraday high of $2.474. Keep a tight stop, as I fully expect Ripple to enter a consolidation / accumulation phase. No trade.
- IOTA ($3.40) Bulls have successfully defended the $3.03 level, but have not been able to push it appreciably higher. I’m looking for IOTA to trade within the $2.62 to $3.60 range, and I will buy only on a breakout.
- - LTC ($222) Litecoin has broken below the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern, and should continue lower into next week. Strong support comes in $175.20, and $110 after that. The bearish view will become invalid with a close above $240. No trade.
- - DASH ($1,026) DASH broke below its 20-day EMA level of support. If bulls cannot defend this level, the next stop is $800 and $650 after that. No trade.
- - XMR ($334) I am expecting range-bound trading action in Monero. Despite the most recent bearish action, $300 is the next level of support and $245 after that. No trade until the fall is arrested.
When the crypto-markets are experiencing bearish action, a good strategy is to wait until the decline ends before buying – rather than being brave and trying to catch a falling knife.
To follow me on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your subscription by visiting:
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <email@example.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a StockTwits follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:
Creativity = https://youtu.be/n2QiPSe_dKk
Investing = https://youtu.be/zIIlk6DlSOM
Marketing = https://youtu.be/p0wWGdOfYXI
Sales = https://youtu.be/blKw0zb6SZk
To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.