RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, January 6, 2019

This Week in Barrons: 1-6-2019


This Week in Barrons: 1-6-2019:




Manage What is in Front of You (with Accountability):

   Gamblers have a saying: “Play the hand you’re dealt”,and “Only bet what you can afford to lose.”  But before they play, every professional gambler will tell you that they spend the 10,000 hours necessary to LEARN how to compete.  Lately, I smile whenever I hear people talk about shortcutting the learning curve by increasing diversity, inclusion, and equity.  Honestly, if it were that easy – don’t you think everybody would do it? After all, many thought Steve Jobs was a bully and had no time for manners.  Most think that Elon Musk doesn’t care about rules. And I personally saw Bill Gates fire 6 people while giving a talk, on stage at the Superdome.   Honestly, no amount of diversity, inclusion, or equity was going to impact the speed at which those 3 individuals ‘got s__t done’.  Why – because they ‘owned’ the learning curve in their respective disciplines.  The big guys were waiting and praying for them to fail.  Meanwhile, the accountability was squarely on their shoulders, and they reminded everyone of that fact regularly.
   People will re-learn how to manage with accountability – when the money dries up. That is when foundations have down years (like in 2018)and when VCs pull-back in order to support their existing investments (like in 2019).  Then we will all stop promoting diversity, inclusion, and equity as cures – and start focusing on speed, results, and sustainability.  Case in point: look what happened to Apple this past week.  They made a managerial error – suddenly phone pricing and upgrade cycles mattered.  Losing as much as Apple did in one day (10%) – has a way of making the way forward very clear.  And to put that in perspective, Apple lost the equivalent of buying: (a) Nvidia (the company), (b) Tesla (and having money left over), or (c) buying 3+ Twitters.
   Downturns shine a bright light on mis-management, and often mis-management is accompanied by little or no accountability.  For example: Pittsburgh has a local professional football team that odds makers had going to the Super Bowl.  Unfortunately due to mis-management – the team failed to even make the playoffs.  In the last week of the season, we had a wide receiver go so far as to refuse to practice with the team before the big game.  What did management do?  They paid the wide receiver NOT to play.  Do they know what kind of message that sends to the rest of the team?  Where’s the accountability?  What do you think the wide receiver will do the next time he doesn’t feel like practicing with the team?
   There are many examples of corporate myopia being traced back to mis-management accompanied by a lack of accountability.  Sony (under Mr. Morita) OWNED the television and musical device (Walkman) world – until J.Q. Public switched to flat screens and mp3 players.  Apple (under Steve Jobs) owned the iPod and iPhone product categories – until J.Q. Public decided there was no reason to pay $1,000+ for a new phone every other year when the Huawei phone was 1/3rdthe price with 90%+ of the functionality.  Both pivoted to become ‘services’ companies, but (in Apple’s case) without any major services to promote (WeChat and WhatsApp have already been acquired by somebody else) – a services based revenue stream is going to be a long time in coming. 
   In 2019, the really bad news for J.Q. Public (JQ) is that he’s going to have to learn how to manage his #1 asset – his stock & bond portfolio.  For the last 9 years he’s been allowed to: (a) NOT manage his own assets because the experts ‘had his back’, and (b) just believe what he was told (rather than doing his own homework).  This will make 2019 a challenging year for JQ, because he’s been fed a laundry list of distractions, and has missed:
-       Machines driving our stock market,
-       The U.S. adjusting its GDP and unemployment calcs to make them look better,
-      The U.S. being over $100T in debt – with no ability to repay,
-      The U.S. having a 105% Debt to GDP ratio – when over 100% is = ‘3rdWorld’,
-      Repossession rates soaring while credit markets are seizing-up,
-      China and Russia building their own financial clearing system – paving the way for the U.S. Dollar no longer being the world’s reserve currency, and 
-      The U.S. being in worse financial shape than in 2007 - 2008.

   JQ has witnessed firsthand the public mis-management of our educational system.  This has caused teachers and public education staff (including college faculty, school psychologists, and employees) to quit their jobs in record numbers.  Teachers cite no pay raises, budget cuts, teaching vs baby-sitting, and improving prospects elsewhere as the key reasons for their departure.  I remember when stability and longevity were the number one perks to being a teacher.
   Politically, JQ is seeing our President having a difficult time pushing his own mis-management down to specific government employees.  And as MJP was quick to point out, when is the last time an incoming congress-person ever referred to the incumbent President as a “MotherF__ker”?



   What’s the FED’s accountability for the upcoming mis-management of our financial soft landing?  Who’s owning the stock market dropping 30% from here – as it will bring commerce to a standstill?  Who’s accountable for the various pension funds that have over $200T in unfunded pension liabilities?
   I’ve said it before – J.Q. Public is not going to know what hit him.  All of the dominoes are in place, and all it's going to take is for the first one to fall. I don’t want to be the doom and gloom guy.  I'm just pointing out the fact that due to our past 10 years of ‘not managing what’s in front of us – with accountability’ – we are in deep doo-doo.  This year J.Q. Public is going to find out just how much mis-management and a lack of accountability is going to cost him.


The Market:



In 2018:
-      2018 was the worst year for the DOW since 2008, and the first decline for the benchmark index since 2015.  The DOWs top and bottom 3 were: Merck (+36%), Pfizer (+21%), Microsoft (+19%), - Dow Dupont (-25%), IBM (-26%), and Goldman Sachs (-34%).
-      66% of the S&Pwere down for 2018, and the top and bottom 3 were: AMD (+80%), Abiomed (+73%), Fortinet (+61%) – L-Brands (-57%), Mohawk (-58%), and Coty (-67%)
-      The Nasdaqwas down 4% for the year, and the top and bottom 3 were: AMD (+80%), Workday (+57%), and Lululemon (+55%) – Kraft Heinz (-45%), JD.com (-50%), and Western Digital (-54%).

For 2019, I blended my thoughts with some of JR’s:
1.   Apple does NOT recover.  Fundamentally: Apple has slumped about 40% from its highs and many value investors are urging you to buy and be patient for a  rebound.  Goldman has compared Apple’s struggles to those of Nokia.  I’m not going that far, but with iPhone revenues flat-lining, and a trade war far from over – I’m not seeing a catalyst for a move higher. MATH: tells me that Apple will close 2019 – 15% lower than today. 
2.   Tesla is stuck in neutral.  Fundamentally: Even though this could be the year Tesla outsells Audi, BMW and Benz combined – I still expect competition in the EV space, cheap gas, and generally weak auto sales to keep Tesla’s stock price in line.  MATH: tells me that Tesla will close 2019 – 10% lower than today.
3.   Netflix is at a nosebleed valuation.  Fundamentally: from privacy concerns to a general decline in tech worship, and from vague growth narratives to investor goodwill propositions – I’m seeing a tech decline in 2019.  MATH: tells me that Netflix will close 2019 – 9% lower than today.
4.   Facebook  will continue to fall.  If 2018 was defined by Facebookcoming back to earth, 2019 will deliver its continued demise along with the unwind of many of its trends due to privacy concerns.  MATH: is telling me Facebook closes 7% lower than today.




5.   10-Year Treasury notes will remain below 3%.  Fundamentally: Yields have fallen since November, thanks to more dovish comments from the FED and real demand from investors looking for safe havens. Those same trends will keep yields  subdued during 2019.  MATH: tells me bonds will close 2019 – 15% lower than today.
6.   OIL prices remain low.  Fundamentally: between U.S. production increases, slowing global demand, and the other oil producing nations being ineffective at cutting production – the over-supply will keep prices depressed.  MATH: is showing that oil will close 2019 – 8% below today’s price.
7.   S&Ps are likely to be 4% lower at the end of 2019 than today.  
8.   GOLD is back.  Gold, silver and their respective miners will be the best performing asset class in 2019.  Gold will finally breakout above its 5-year base of $1,400 and trend higher.  Silver will move above $14, and will display a ‘buy signal’ there before it moves higher.  MATH: Gold is likely to be 2% higher at the close of 2019 than today – and silver will outperform gold.
9.   ICE (Internal Combustion Engine): Dan Neil wrote a piece in last week’s WSJ saying: “If you purchase an internal combustion engine automobile now, be prepared for it to be worth NOTHING in 5 years.”  You can argue with me all you want, but Dan is ‘the man’ and a well-respected automotive guru. 
10.Pay-To-Play:  If companies won’t pay for talent, talent will go where the money flows.  2019 will be the year where we see the really talented people change allegiance at the drop of a hat.  (Downturns in markets bring out those reactions.)  In 2019, if you're not inventing – you’re losing.  It’s a business – not a museum.  Good management (with accountability), traction, feedback and momentum are the important requirements for innovation in 2019.


Info-Bits:

2019 could see:
-       Uber  change how we get from one place to another. 

-      Option Trading  go mainstream.  It grew 22% last year – exceeding all other financial products.

-      The Boomer Crisis:  Due to retirement issues, we’re going to see renewed pressure on growth stocks over dividend stocks.  Diversification will include: growth, dividends, bonds, and crypto.  This will lower bond yields and help to drive a crypto bull market as retirement money seeks yield. 

-      The Rise of Nintendo:  Nintendo released a smash hit with the Switch Console – two years ago.  We’re in the beginning of the device cycle, and their 2019 gaming pipeline looks strong.  Additionally Nintendo is releasing an iOS focused Mario Kart game – shortly.

-      Bank Stocks:  With most financials generally trading rangebound to down, 2019 should see favorites and I’m liking: J.P. Morgan, Citibank, and PNC.


Crypto-Bytes:

   Bitcoin made it to 2019 without:
-      a Bitcoin ETF, 
-      dates for the Bakkt launch, 
-      any clear crypto regulations, or 
-      any trusted custodian.
   Bitcoin did gain another believer in Tony Robbins and his 3m followers.  One element that has not changed is the differing opinions on crypto.  Many developers still believe that it’s a garbage network, others that it will revolutionize governance, and still others believe it will replace gold as a store of value.  We have seen Bitcoin ‘almost’ die over 90 times in 2018, and there are ‘almost’ 1,000 dead Altcoins out there.  
-      In 2018, 2,284 initial coin offerings reached their conclusion as investors poured in $11.4B – an average of $5m per offering.  During 2017, the corresponding values were showed 966 ICOs taking in $10B for a $10m per project average. 
-      Ethereum achieved its historical high on Jan. 13, 2018 ($1,352), while the lowest level of the year was touched on December 15 ($84 – losing 94%).
-      The top 5 countries for completed ICOs are: USA (645), Singapore (437), U.K. (364), Russia (295), and Switzerland (207).  
-      The performance of token sales in 2018 that passed the first step was better than 2017, with 19% of the 2018 projects achieving their soft cap — as compared to 10% a year ago.

   2019 brings us more critics blaming the reliability of ICOs on their promotional antics and starting to focus on security token offerings (STOs) or other possible traditional investment vehicles.  And even after a dramatic downsizing, the crypto market is still larger than at the beginning of 2017 – anda concentration in industries serviced could finally signal a wider understanding and adoption.


Weed & BioTech:

GW Pharmaceuticals (GWPH = $108 / +4.72% YTD):  GW Pharma is becoming a solid investment option in 2019.  J.P. Morgan raised $345m for GWPH in an October 2017 stock offering.  Their Epidiolex drug (the world’s first marijuana drug to treat severe forms of epilepsy) could surpass $1B in annual sales by 2023.  The U.S. FDAhas approved the plant-derived oral solution of cannabidiol and beginning in 2019, doctors can start prescribing Epidiolex.  Price Forecast: Median target is $181.00 (+79.5%) with a high estimate of $221.00 or a +119.2% climb.

Vanda Pharmaceuticals (VNDA = $27.75 /+5.41% YTD):  Vanda Pharmaceuticals will be banking on sales of their two FDA-approved therapies: Hetlioz – a drug for the treatment of non-24-hour sleep disorder, and Fanapt – a drug treating schizophrenia.  The FDA is set to decide on August 16, 2019 whether Hetlioz is able to expand its patient pool.  Since it’s a high-margin specialty drug, an approval could double the share price of Vanda.  Price Forecast: Median target is $43.50 (+61.1%) with a high estimate of $52.00 or a +92.5% jump from its latest price of $27.02.


Last Week:
   Last week was an ugly week, and it goes much deeper than just Apple.  Apple's CEO Tim Cook told us that for the first time in decades, that Apple’s (AAPL) revenue numbers were going to miss their estimates.  Considering so many people thought Apple was completely immune to global economics, it was quite a shock.  But it wasn't just AAPL that was getting rocked last week – it was everything connected to AAPL including: chip makers, screen makers, and even case makers.  Finally, we are seeing the proof that things aren't nearly as rosy as everyone thinks they are.  Now granted, Apple is used to their users throwing away perfectly good phones so they can rush out and buy the newer more expensive model.   I can’t fault them for assuming that behavior would go on forever.  But sentiment changes instantly in a downturn, and causes people not to cough up that extra $1,100 for a phone.  It’s natural to blame China and the tariffs, but it’s almost impossible to return to the way things were.
   Last week also gave us an ISM (Institute for Supply Management) report.  The ‘New Orders’ portion of the report showed the 3rdlargest DROP ever recorded. That means that businesses are not buying.  Yet another data point telling us that our economy is not as strong as what we might think. 
   Factually, last week’s expected move for the S&P (SPX) was predicted to be $84.  For the week we moved upward $46 – so we stayed within the expected move.  However over the last 5 days, the historical volatility in the S&Ps is averaging above 30% - which is a lot.  And the corresponding historical volatility in the Nasdaq is averaging over 40%.  Those kinds of Nasdaq numbers are reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis with one major difference – nobody is panicking out there right now.  FYI, I took Friday’s wild move to the upside as indicative of a long term, hostile market place.  


Next Week:  



   The December jobs report was a blow-out number.  Instead of creating the +179k jobs that everyone expected – we got a whopping +312K.  Now granted, a lot of that was holiday hiring, but it does create an interesting issue for the FEDs.  While economic numbers such as the latest ISM report, car sales, and housing sales are showing a severe slow-down (giving the FED a reason NOT to hike) – the big jobs report and rising wages gives them the ‘green light’ to move things higher.  It's an interesting dance, and should put a lid on all those people screaming that the FED is hiking into a coming recession.  How do you have a recession when we've seen the fastest pace of hiring in 4 years?  Now, the last couple times we had a blow-out December, the following few months were in fact, dismal (as those holiday people got their pink slips).
   I’ve been looking for this type of rally for the past 2 months, but only if we received: (a) a signal that the FED rate hikes were ending, and/or (b) a deal with China.  Well, on Friday the FED told us that the hikes are on hold for now.  Is this the start of something big?  I think it could be.  Granted it’s nuts gaining almost 800 points in one day, but that's the beast we're in now. Thursday we were down 660, and Friday we were up 800.  What does Monday bring?  I think that we're going higher next week, as they try and claw back some of the big plunge.
   I still believe that 2019 will show us a lower market, but from where will the drop start?  I'm watching 2400 on the S&P as a potential battle line.  If we lose that, we're going to slide a lot further – and I will institute shorts under that scenario.   Another scenario that is going on right now is the push up into 2575, 2626 or even 2655 on the S&Ps.  There's a lot of upside resistance out there now, but if we use the 50-day at 2655 as our end point - I think that would be a logical place to scale into  some shorts.  So, we've got a box.  The December lows at 2400 and the 50-day at 2655 – with a couple points in between such as 2575 and 2626 that could also prove as barriers.  Into next week, I’m looking long for the first half of the week – then looking for short plays. 


Tips:

Top Equity Recommendations:
   HODL’s:
-      Aurora(ACB = $5.22 / in @ $3.57), 
-      Canntrust Holdings(CNTTF = $5.36 / in @ $3.12),
-      Canopy Growth Corp(CGC = $28.25 / in @ 22.17),
-      Ceco Environmental(CECE = $6.89 / in @ $6.95), and
-      NVAX (NVAX = $2.15 / in @ $2.04)


   Crypto:
-      Bitcoin(BTC = $3,850)
-      Ethereum(ETH = 154.00)
-      Bitcoin Cash (BCH = 160.00)


   Options:
-      Canopy (CGC): Bullish: Feb 15, -35 / +30 Put Credit Spread,
-      QQQ: (QQQ = 156.23) Bearish: Feb 15, Sold the -165 / +170 Call Credit Spread,
-      VIX:(VIX = 21.38) Bearish: Jan 19, Buy the 25 PUT, 
-      XLF:(XLF = 24.27)  Neutral: Jan 11, Sold the -23.5 / +24.5 Call Credit Spread,
-      XLU: (XLU = 52.63)  Neutral: Jan 18, Buy the +53 / -54 Call Debit Spread


   Thoughts:
   I know it’s hard to take your eyes off of the Apple smack down, but you may want to turn your attention to volatility for a minute.  If you think that the bad news about AAPL might trickle through the rest of the market and take the Nasdaq Index (QQQ) lower, and want to take advantage of QQQ’s 84% IV rank, the short call vertical that’s short the 165 call and long the 170 call in the Feb expiration with 40 days until expiration is a bearish strategy that has a 78% probability of being profitable.

   Follow me on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>. 

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.

If you'd like to view R.F.'s actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a StockTwits follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see R.F. in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: 
Creativity = https://youtu.be/n2QiPSe_dKk   
Startup Incinerator = https://youtu.be/ieR6vzCFldI

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson






Saturday, December 29, 2018

This Week in Barrons: 12.30.2018



This Week in Barrons: 12-30-2018:



What does a bear market look like?  
   A bear market is when stocks see at least a 20% decline from a recent high.  Bear markets are also marked by overall Wall Street pessimism.  According to Goldman Sachs, bear markets last on average 13 months, and lose 30.4% of the overall market value.  It usually takes stocks an average 22 months to recover from a bear market.



  The above chart is one of the most important for investors and traders to see before the new year.  After 20% declines in almost all of the major indexes, you can definitely make the case that the historic bull market from 2009 through 2018 is over.  In 2018, home builder stocks fell by 32%, robotics – down 30%, regional banks – down 22%, energy – destroyed, transports – down 15%, Russell – down 13%, and the list goes on.  Barring something bizarre on Monday, this will be the first year in a long time that the S&P, DOW, and Nasdaq all end the year in negative territory. 
   This is going to bother our leaders because rule #1 is: “You don't mess with someone else’s money.”  Social issues are one thing – cash is another.  After all, we got into our current situation by leaving globalization and the crash of 2008 behind.  Donald Trump is the perfect man for the Internet and social media era.  The only problem is – he’s the President of the United States.  Trump understands that in an attention based economy, you've got to make news every day.  Unfortunately he's no longer just the host of "The Apprentice" – but running the country.  How long until the outrage against Trump spreads? Great question, but with a current government shutdown and an incoming Democratic House of Representatives – we may not have to wait very long to find out.  If your Presidency is based upon making people wealthy again, what happens if the average person’s net worth actually goes down?
   Economist Mohamed El-Erian (of Allianz) recently warned Wall Street that being overly concerned about an economic recession could actually cause one.  He said: “We’ve got to be careful because we can talk ourselves into a recession by allowing bad technicals to become bad economics.”  El-Erian thinks that to get into a recession: (a) the rest of the world needs to dramatically slow down (which it could), (b) we need to start seeing labor market weakness (GM could be the start), and (c) our FED continues with ‘auto-pilot’ interest rate hikes and balance sheet reductions rather than being data dependent.  El-Erian added that there is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the slowing economies in Europe, China, and Japan.  After all, both the FED and the ECB are tightening into slowing economies, with larger than expected debt loads, and much more uncertain political futures.


The Market:




Predictions for 2019:
-      Kelley Wright (IQ Trends):  thinks that we will see a relief rally in January, and finish 2019 up about 8%.  He sees no recession over the next two years, thinks the FED will be on ‘pause’ for 2019, and that 2020 will bring in a bull market due to the election year.

-      John Putnam: is looking for trouble in the telecom and hospital sectors due to their inability to re-finance their large (stock buyback) debt loads. 

-      Buckingham:  is eyeing opportunities in the semiconductor sector, and specifically Lam Research (LRCX) – which supplies the equipment used to make chips.  It’s 50% off its highs, and trades at less than 8 times forward earnings.

-      Todd Horwitz (Bubba Trading):  predicts that next year is going to be: “Very rough.  I think we’re going into a recession, and can see another 15 to 20% drop and a sell-off in the making.  We have way too much debt in this country as total corporate debt has swelled to nearly $9.1T.  Our banks are over-leveraged and corporate earnings are slowing.”

-      Energy:  is down over 40% this year, and many stock pickers are looking for a bounce.  Some are viewing the energy companies coming out of bankruptcy as being ripe for an upside explosion such as: Halcon Resources (HK), Bonanza Creek Energy (BCEL), and Midstates Petroleum (MPO).

-      Online sales:  continue to ramp up, and demand for the boxes used for shipping will ramp with it.  WestRock (WRK) makes those boxes, and also has a 5% yield.

-      Dividend stocks:  are ripe for the picking.  (a) JPMorgan Chase (JPM) historically bottoms when its yield hits 3.3% - which is where it is now.  (b) AbbVie (ABBV) looks cheap when its yield hits 4.5% - and it’s currently over 5%. And (c) Altria (MO) looks ripe when its yield rises to 7% - and currently it’s above 6.5%.
  

Info-Bits:




With the end of 2018:
-      Say “Goodbye”: to Claire’s, GE, Sears, and David’s Bridal – it’s been nice.

-       Say “Hello”:  to Spotify, Dropbox, and Apple becomingthe first $1T company.  

-      Say “We’re Back”: as Amazon’s HQ2 found a home in New York and Virginia.

-      Say “Just Married”:  to Disney & Fox, Comcast & Sky, CVS Health & Aetna, and AT&T & Time Warner.

-      Say “I can see clearly now”:   as SpaceX launched its first national security location satellite that is 3X times more accurate than current GPS technology.

-      Say “It could get ugly out here”:  as California sees its tax collections take a hit in December because of its heavy reliance on the wealthy and their exposure to the financial markets.  Cali’s top 1% of personal income tax earners generate about 50% of the state’s personal income taxes.  A bear market will prove painful, and will potentially force a revision to the state’s budget.


Crypto-Bytes:
-      Our Defense Dept.:  is using blockchain to improve its disaster relief.

-      PwC:  predicts greater institutional interest in crypto in 2019.

-      Our Nonprofits: are adopting Bitcoin in droves for donations.

-      Venezuela: saw their biggest increase in Bitcoin volume in December.

-      Africa:  conducts over 17,000 Bitcoin trades per day using gift cards.  

-      Square:  (and its support of Bitcoin) was named Yahoo Finance Co. of the Year. 

-      Our FED:  is still not (at all) convinced about cryptocurrencies – oh well.

   2018 saw a lot of big players like TD Ameritrade, Fidelity, and Goldman Sachs enter the crypto space.  Yale University announced they would invest part of their endowment in a large crypto fund.  Intercontinental Exchange’s Bakkt and ErisX will shortly begin to offer crypto risk management products.  While it may be a bear market, Bakkt reports that corporations are continuing to commit more resources to cryptocurrency projects.  Trading firms are staffing up, exchanges are being started, we’re improving our anti-money laundering & know-your-customer practices, and are developing better solutions surrounding custody. 2019 should bring us fewer hacks on exchanges, minimal illegal security token offerings, and less coin ‘forks’.  All-in-all, the industry is growing upward, outward, and continuing to reveal its true value.


Healthcare for 2019:
   The health-technology industry is wrapping up a marquee year.  Start-ups in the space received record levels of VC funding, with the second half of the year featuring some notable acquisitions – including ResMed’s $225m purchase of Propeller Health.  Forecasters are predicting:
-      The Apple Watch  will start a ‘health feature arms race’ from all the makers of wearables.

-      Medicare Advantage Plans  will take over as baby boomers age into Medicare.  These plans are quickly adopting new technologies because of the way they get paid.  They make money on a subscription basis by keeping their members as healthy as possible.

-      Amazon  (with its most recent PillPack acquisition) will continue its healthcare onslaught. It’s already formed an employer health coalition with J.P. Morgan and Berkshire Hathaway, and it offered a big discount on Prime to low-income Medicaid recipients.  Soon, Amazon will make a bold play into the health insurance vertical.

-      Big Pharma  will continue to hunt for innovation – whether it’s in biotech or artificial intelligence start-ups, or in digital healthcare companies.

-      2019 will bring breakthroughs in how conditions such as depression and anxiety are being tracked and managed.


Last Week:



   Last weekend, Treasury secretary Mnuchin asked the CEO's of the 6 biggest banks (Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo) how their loans and liquidity were going.  They all replied that things were fine.  Just the idea that the Treasury asked these questions, raised red flags everywhere.  Do the FEDs see something that we don't?  Have the big banks stopped lending money or are their defaults soaring?  Then Mnuchin called a meeting with the Plunge Protection Team (PPT).  The PPT is real, and is often referred to as: the ‘President's Working Group on Financial Markets’.  This is a group (put together in the 80's) that assesses the health of the financial system during times of stress. The group includes officials from the FED as well as the SEC, and was last convened in 2009 during the latter stage of the financial crisis.  If they determine that things are getting ugly, they have the ability to make the necessary moves. This group (on the surface)  only surveys and makes suggestions to keep things functioning properly – but don't kid yourself.  Using various dark money pools they have the ability to do virtually anything from buying stock futures to direct injections of currency. 
   So the question is, if everything is working properly - Why did Mnuchin call the banks, and Why is he convening the plunge protection team?  Because it isn't just the markets that are broken – it’s the economy.  Our global economy is grinding to a halt and the market plunge is the most visible piece of that.  9 years of financial monkey business:  zero interest rates, governments owning securities, mountains of created derivatives, and a host of other ills have pushed this market to heights it should have never seen. Since Chairman Powell has decided to try and ‘normalize’ rates, there is a lot of creaking and groaning going on. Things are beginning to break.  In December alone, the S&P 500 is down nearly 12.5%, while the Nasdaq Composite has slumped 13.6%. The Nasdaq is now in a bear market, having declined nearly 22% from its record high in late August, and the S&P is not far off that level.  Corporate credit markets have been under duress, and measures of the investment grade corporate bond market are poised for their worst yearly performance since the 2008 financial crisis.  The high-yield bond market (where companies with the weakest credit profiles raise capital) has not seen a deal all month.  The last time that happened was in November of 2008.


Next Week:  

   OMG - we’re crashing!  Well – not exactly.  I do not think we’re in for a repeat of 2008.  This bull market is 10 years old, and is long overdue for a reality check. Political instability can scare the novices and inflict some short term damage to the longs, but this is the market I’ve been expecting and talking about for quite some time.  We are finally getting some 2-sided price action, heightened volatility, fearful editors, and clueless financial advisors. We’re finally getting a market that will be creating non-stop opportunities.  Additionally, I would not expect a change in market behavior for quite a while.  All of this is good news because now we can go old-school.  That means we can sell into the rallies and buy into the dips.  That means we can potentially trade based upon fundamentals.  I don’t believe there has been a time when a government shutdown, an unhinged president, a weakened FED, global uncertainty or threatened impeachment has caused a sustained sell-off.  Remember, it’s the ‘no-see-ums’ that kill markets – never the obvious facts.
   Last week brought us a 1,000 point rally.  Here are 5 reasons not to believe in it:
1.    The Volatility Futures are showing us that there is more risk in the next 21 days – than in the next 49 and 83 days.  With an inverted volatility structure, a rally will never hold.
2.    The rally Correlation Coefficient was 100% – meaning that everything was being bought.  The futures were leading the order-flow and there was no discrimination to the buying.
3.    The rally volume was minimal – about equal to our (half-day) Christmas Eve volume.
4.    The Volatility of the Volatility Index (VVIX) had one of its largest one day drops in history.  Although traders were selling their VIX Calls, they were only selling their winnings and reloading.
5.   When you look back over the S&Ps for the past 20 years, the dramatic sell side activity that we’ve seen over the past 13 weeks – has normally taken years to accomplish.  So the timeframe maps are telling us that there’s more to come – and it’s potentially right around the corner.

   In terms of next week, I’m thinking that the S&Ps could drive us higher into 2575 and potentially into 2626.


Tips:


Volatility Survival Guide:
1.   Control Your Risk:  A market that is volatile – is one that delivers constant opportunity.  The buy-and-hold / passive investing psychology – never sees the ‘blood in the streets’ opportunities.  We’re nowhere near that environment.
2.   Do NOT let Short-Term trades – turn into Long-Term investments.  Everybody has some ‘junk’ in their portfolio – don’t be afraid to clean it out.
3.   If you’re trading options, use ‘spreads’ whenever possible.  A volatility crush will ‘suck’ the premium right out of an option – so protect yourself against that.
4.   Nobody can time anything in this market, so you have to strategize around it.  Think survival rather than optimization.  Think about selling volatility to those out there that want to buy it.


Top Equity Recommendations:

   HODL’s:
-      Aurora (ACB = $5.21 / in @ $3.57), 
-      Canntrust Holdings (CNTTF = $5.05 / in @ $3.12),
-      Canopy Growth Corp (CGC = $27.35 / in @ 22.17),
-      Ceco Environmental (CECE = $6.60 / in @ $6.95), and
-      NVAX (NVAX = $1.84 / in @ $2.04)


   Crypto:
-      Bitcoin (BTC = $3,900)
-      Ethereum (ETH = 136.71)
-      Bitcoin Cash (BCH = 169.89)


  Options:
-      Canopy (CGC): Bullish: Jan 18, -40 / +35 Put Credit Spread,
-      IWM: (IWM = 132.91)  Neutral: Jan 4, Buy the +130 / -132.5 / +135 Call B-Fly,
-      VIX: (VIX = 28.34) Bearish: Jan 19, Buy the 25 PUT, 
-      XLF: (XLF = 23.59)  Neutral: Jan 4, Buy the +23 / -23.5 / +24 Call B-Fly,
-      XLK: (XLK = 61.40)  Neutral: Jan 4, Buy the +61 / -62 / +63 Call B-Fly, and
-      XLU: (XLU = 52.83)  Neutral: Jan 4, Buy the +55 / -56 Call Debit Spread

   Thoughts:

   NEM (a gold miner) has been one of the stronger stocks on the board as it’s been following gold higher.  NEM’s options show a slight market bias toward the upside, with out-of-the-money CALLS trading a bit richer than equidistant PUTS.  I think NEM might stay inside a wide range for the next month or so, and the iron condor that’s long the 30 PUT, short the 32 PUT, short the 38 CALL and long the 40 CALL in the February expiration with 49 days until expiration – is a neutral strategy that collects a credit 1/3 the width of the strikes, has a 70% probability of making 50% of its max profit before expiration.

   Follow me on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>. 

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.

If you'd like to view R.F.'s actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a StockTwits follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see R.F. in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: 
Creativity = https://youtu.be/n2QiPSe_dKk   
Startup Incinerator = https://youtu.be/ieR6vzCFldI

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson