This
Week in Barrons – 10-9-2016:
What if the FED secretly wanted
to eliminate ALL of the ‘active’ asset managers and hedge funds? Moves by our FED to eliminate the natural business
cycles (recessions) through asset inflation – making stock selection and asset
allocation less relevant – make more sense.
It’s an easy playbook: a) lower rates, b) trigger a reach for yield, c) cause
a rise in asset prices, and then d) wait for the ‘wealth effect’ which will rebuild
corporate balance sheets and reignite our animal spirits.
But if it were that simple,
then why (after 90+ months of zero interest rates) is GDP growth being lowered
to 1.6%, and growth in corporate earnings and productivity still negative? Unfortunately, growth is not measured in stock
prices, but rather by innovation, and by the ability to manufacture and deliver
goods more efficiently. Hedge funds and
‘active’ investment managers have always played key roles in this process by allocating
capital to those successful firms, and limiting the capital flowing to the
unsuccessful. This is the basis of
capitalism. Our FED’s model not only
ignores these creative/destructive forces, but works against them. For example: if you doubled the value of all of
the homes in the U.S. overnight – you would not increase productivity. In fact, you just reduced the incentive for any
home owner to improve their property if they know that it’s value will double
without any additional investment or care.
Unfortunately, this may
get worse before it gets better. Ms.
Yellen, in her talk last Thursday said: “It
could be useful if the FED had the power to actually buy corporate stocks and
bonds.” Spoken like a true central
monetary planner. Obviously our FED’s
efforts are not working, so in her mind – we need to do MORE of the same. It’s like she doesn’t even realize that she’s
ripping the heart out of the capitalistic machine – or does she?
On another front, why are 40
million Russians currently going through disaster preparation drills?
-
It started when
the U.S. wanted Syrian President Bashar Assad out of power because Syria (a
Russian ally) refused to allow QATAR to run a natural gas pipeline over their
land in order to supply natural gas to Europe – thereby eliminating Russia from
supplying their energy.
-
The media called
Assad a "ruthless dictator who abused
his people."
-
Qatar &
Saudi Arabia funded mercenaries to make it look like a ‘civil war’.
-
Assad asked
Russia for help, and Russia sent in equipment & troops.
-
Russia uncovered
terror groups (ISIS and Al-Qaida) earning $100m/month stealing and transporting
stolen oil from Syria into Turkey and selling it.
-
Russia stopped the
terror groups by bombing the convoys carrying the stolen oil, but this also
limited the profits of certain Turkish government officials including Turkish
President Erdogan.
-
U.S. aid continued
to flow to the ‘rebels’ in the effort to overthrow Assad, until it was made
public that the ‘rebels’ the U.S. was funding were actually ISIS and Al-Qaida
terrorists.
-
When that news hit,
the U.S. stepped up its response, and had coalition aircraft attack the Syrian
Army, killing 62 and wounding 100.
-
The U.S. claimed
that the attack was a mistake, but when the Russians called an emergency
meeting of the UN Security Council – without any explanation, U.S. Ambassador
Samantha Powers simply walked out.
-
Russia then publicly
stated: "We have come to the terrifying conclusion, that the U.S. is
actually supporting the ISIS terrorists."
-
Russia attacked
a well-known Terrorist Operations Center. Among the dead terrorists were
three dozen uniformed military officers from the United States and Turkey. What were uniformed officers doing inside a Terrorist
Operations Center?
-
Shortly
thereafter the Syrian army reclaimed their largest city Aleppo – due in large part
to air support provided by Russia.
-
The U.S. (sensing
a complete failure in their efforts to oust Assad), told Russia to stop or it
would cut-off cooperation.
-
Yesterday the U.S.
cut-off diplomatic cooperation with Russia, and is now allegedly planning an
outright military attack to achieve its goal of ousting Syrian President Assad.
-
In response, Russia
has moved its S-300v4 surface-to-air missile defense system into Syria. This
means that Russia can effectively ground all US aircraft operating in Syria
simply by turning-on the S-300v4 system.
-
Most recently,
Poland and Romania became home to U.S. missile defense systems designed to
shoot missiles out of the sky.
-
U.S. / NATO said
the systems are there to protect against launches from Iran. Unfortunately, the radar stations are aimed
east / northeast at Russia instead of south/ southeast at Iran.
-
Russia made
clear that if those missile defense systems went active in Romania and Poland,
Russia would take action.
-
The U.S. / NATO
made the systems active two weeks ago.
-
Remember, Russia
was asked to help Syria, and has permission from the Syrian government to be in
that country.
-
The U.S. did not
ask for permission, and does not have it.
-
The U.S. does
not have a declaration of war OR any authorization for the use of military
force by Congress.
-
The U.S. does
not have a UN Security Council resolution to be in Syria.
This highlights why Syria
is so dangerous. We are one downed jet
or one tactical nuke away from a war with a nation that we do not want to be at
war with. Putin is regularly attacked by
the media and by Hillary. Heck, the DNC blames
their hack on Putin. That’s what is called
‘carpet bombing’ the people into believing that the "U.S. is good, and Russia
is bad." We live in dangerous
times. Let’s hope calmer heads will
prevail.
The Market:
Factually:
-
U.S. economic
growth was again revised downward to only 1.6% for 2016.
-
Corporate
earnings are set to decline for the 6th straight quarter.
-
The Shiller 10-year
P/E is 26.7x, and price-to-sales levels are comparable to 1999 – right before
the recession.
-
Honeywell, PPG
and Wal-Mart all warned of lower sales.
And when Wal-Mart can’t do well – no one can do well.
-
Currently 33% of
the worlds sovereign debt ($12T) is under a negative yield condition. FYI there is a strong argument to be made that
negative interest rates are deflationary.
-
Construction
spending fell into contraction for the first time in 5 yrs.
-
Last week we
were told that the U.S. had agreed to cut the fine against Deutsche Bank (DB)
to $5B from $14B. The problem however is
that they didn't even start negotiations, and the rumor was floated simply to
stop a market collapse.
I’m seeing this a lot,
whenever the S&P’s get to 2144 – something happens to change its
direction. On September 29th the
low of the day was 2145. On October 4th
we put in a low of 2144. Last Thursday we tried to come out of the gate
green, but still fell right to the 2144 level.
On Friday we were on our way to a pretty ugly session with the S&P’s
down 12 to that 2144 level, but then buying started and we ended the day at
2153. Clearly the line in the sand is
2144, followed by 2140.
Call me crazy, but
whenever the market is soggy and looking like it's finally going to roll over –
the Central Banksters rush in with money and/or rumors or both. They don't try and shoot for all-time highs
any more, they're just happy moving the market sideways in a range between 2144
and 2170. I can give you 200 reasons why
the lower limit should be broken, but I can only give you 1 reason why this
market should push higher. But that one reason
is a big one – the fact that every Central Bankster is buying stock to save the
world from recession.
This week I received many
questions about gold. Jason Goepfert
(President of Sundial Capital Research) said: “When gold is trading above its
200-day average, it advances at an annualized rate of 12.7%.” Gold briefly dipped below its 200-day moving
average last week and Goepfert found: “When this happened 50% of the time it
led to a protracted bear market in the metal.
But in the other 50% of the occurrences – it led to almost immediate,
and sustained, gains as we can see from the table below.” So the good news is that we will know the
answer to the gold dilemma very soon.
Finally, on Friday a 2005 video
was released showing Donald Trump bragging about how being a star made it easy
for him to ‘make moves’ on women. The
language got a little ‘salty’, and the democrats went crazy condemning it. At virtually the same time, ‘hackers’
released thousands of emails from Hillary's campaign manager and from her Wall
Street talks. In them was more proof of:
-
Her selling ‘pay
for play’,
-
Her calling half
the nation functional illiterates, and
-
Her making it clear
that gun manufacturers should be held liable for anything that their owners did.
On one hand we have an
11-year-old tape of ‘Donald the Playboy Trump’ getting caught talking locker
room trash, and on the other we have Hillary "I’ve never sent or received
a confidential email" Clinton being deceitful and downright scary. The ‘Establishment’ wants no part of Trump. The ‘Deplorables’ want Trump no matter
what. It’s possible that Wall street
looks at this last Donald event as proof Hillary will win, and they rally the
market this week. But there's still no
trend. Big up days are followed by two
more days of selling. Sitting quietly or
day-trading is the only game in town until a trend establishes itself. Be careful.
TIPS:
I also received a lot of e-mail surrounding my AG and NDG stock picks. I recommended purchasing AG back at $3 per
share. Today AG is $8 per share, but
recently was as high as $20 per share.
And at $20 per share, an initial
investment of $20k had turned into $240k.
But AG (like the rest of the miners) had gone up too high – too fast,
and was overdue for a correction. But I did
not think that the mining sector would fall below its 200-day moving average. A large part of this mining ‘shake-out’ was as
a result of what was going on in the currency markets. Between the Japanese yen and the British pound
sterling, gold has fallen below $1,300 per ounce. On the trade, we are
still up about 270% for the year – so don’t go jumping out of any open windows
just yet. I fear that there will be a
post-election pull-back, and that Hillary (the presumed winner) will push us
into a war with Russia over Libya, Iraq, or Syria. For all of those reasons, precious metals continue
look attractive to me on a fundamental basis.
But maybe the world erupts into unicorns and puppies, the global
recovery takes hold, and gold and silver sink back to their lows. If you’re still in the play:
-
And AG remains below
its 200-day moving average, then cash in half – let the other half run –
playing with the house’s money.
-
If Gold bounces
and follows the emerging markets higher (as the above chart suggests) – stay in
and hold on for a wild ride.
As far as NGD goes, Gold
is currently trading at $1,259 per ounce, and traders are saying that the line
in the sand for Gold is $1252. A close
below $1,252 and $1,100 could be right around the corner – causing me to get
out of the NGD position.
I’m going to continue to nibble on: AG, AUY, CDE, FCX, FFMGF, FSM, HL,
NGD, PAAS, PGLC and SAND – knowing that they could have a little more downside until
moving higher.
To
follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com
to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author,
R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any
reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in
complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
No comments:
Post a Comment