This
Week in Barrons – 10-16-2016:
“The U.S. dollar is
taking no prisoners.”
The Dollar:
The dollar index continues to climb higher,
and that has ominous implications for the stock market. The firing of a daily ‘squeeze’ has taken the
dollar index from 94 to 98 in a very short period of time. The weekly and monthly ‘squeezes’ still waiting
to fire, give us a recipe for continued dollar strength relative to all of the other
currencies. The last time a monthly
‘squeeze’ fired (2 years ago) we gained 20 points. Therefore, when this one fires it could be a
disaster for a lot of currency markets – taking down the Canadian Dollar,
Australian Dollar, Euro, and British Pound to name a few. Commodity prices will also be trashed, and a
lot of industries depend upon stable commodity prices such as food, oil and
mining. Gold is a little dicey because
as uncertainty increases – so does the price of gold. But to be safe, buy gold in Euros – because
the Euro will go down faster than the price of gold. A cheaper currency is good for many places
including the European Union – because it makes their exports ‘cheaper’ in U.S.
dollars. The real issue is ‘emerging
economies’ where they still pay their debts in U.S. dollars. With the value of the dollar rising, they will
need to pay more in their local currency to equal the same number of U.S.
dollars. It’s similar to having an
adjustable rate mortgage in a rising interest rate environment. So a significantly stronger dollar will destroy
emerging economies.
One reason for the dollar moving higher is
that the market is adjusting to a December FED interest rate increase. Interest rate moves happen over decades, and as
rates rise – bond prices fall. This
trend is reflected on the graph below showing bond prices since 2008.
For the last couple of decades, rates have
been steadily moving lower – all the while bond prices have increased. The good news is that bonds will predict
catastrophic failure (before it is reflected in the economy) by taking out the
trend line shown on the graph. The bonds
and dollar move conversely – that is to say as the dollar increases in value
the bonds will go lower. Therefore, when
the dollar explodes higher, bonds will break the trend line, and that will
foretell increased market volatility.
Rick Santelli of CNBC remarked: “It’s incredible for me to think that
there have been 100 FED meetings and only one rate increase”. SF suggested that our FED could even be
monitoring the wrong elements. Rather
than measuring elements that include ‘fictitious adjustments’ – why not simply report
only the real numbers and allow our experts to draw their own conclusions. For example: on Friday the retail sales
number came in much LOWER than expected; however, an undisclosed ‘seasonal
adjustment’ turned this disaster into a 0.6%
GAIN.
The second reason that the dollar is moving
higher is that major sovereign wealth funds are experiencing a ‘lack of confidence’. The U.S. is the most ‘liquid’ market in the
world; therefore, if you’re in charge of a $100B sovereign wealth fund, you
need to have some of your fund invested in the U.S. With the current ‘lack of confidence’ and the
currency unwinding that is going on, the dollar is going higher simply because
there is nowhere else to hide. Wealth
funds are simply buying dollars due to their low-risk and high liquidity.
The dollar exploding higher exposes stock
market risk. With Amazon rising from $34.68
in 2009 to $824 today and Google moving from $123 in 2009 to $804 today – there
is a legitimate question of how much higher can these stocks go? A higher dollar hurts U.S. stocks because
companies will not be able to sell their goods and services overseas (due to their
higher prices) – causing revenues and profits to decline. The higher dollar will also reinforce an exodus
in U.S. manufacturing.
Ms. Yellen, just ask yourself a simple
question: Are U.S. tax revenues covering government spending (yes/no)? If the answer is ‘yes’ – then raise interest
rates (which will naturally slow down the economy). If the answer is ‘no’ (our tax revenues do
not even come close to covering government spending) – then how can you raise
rates? The good news is that all of the
numbers are regularly on display at: http://www.usdebtclock.org.
The Market:
“The market’s
momentum & fundamentals are gone – it’s just a leap of faith”
We all know that the real
reason that this market hasn’t fallen apart is due to our friendly Central Banksters.
It’s no longer rumor that the Swiss
National Bank owns $80B+ of U.S. stocks, or that the Japanese Government owns
over 50% of all stocks on the Japanese exchange. Central Banksters are in a unique position of
being able to print money out of thin air, and use it to buy up futures and
stocks. A well-timed futures buy (using a
few billion in ‘funny money’) can turn a falling market into a roaring blast
higher.
Tuesday we saw earnings
warnings from Alcoa, Wal-Mart and Honeywell.
The market fell under the S&P’s 2144 support level and through
2140. The last bastion of hope was the
lower end ‘trend line’ of 2135, and we lost that on Friday. This is a clear signal that this market is
tired. It's been jabbed with cattle
prods for months. Each time that it
weakens, it is forced higher on the low volume Central Bankster strategic buys.
It desperately wants to correct. But
because it’s been propped it up for so long, any time it looks ready to fail –
everyone is looking for the Central Banksters to step in and save it. I don't trust this market at all. Technically losing 2135 on a closing basis means
that we're going to see 2120 soon. Lose
that and its 2100, and probably much lower. On the upside, we need to see them get past
2145 on a closing basis for me to think there's any chance of stringing a few
up days together. But non-spectacular
earnings coupled with a FED rate hike in December all but guarantee a ‘toxic
sludge combo platter’.
But what about the
election? Once the election is over, our
Central Banksters do NOT have to keep the market UP any longer. If Trump were to win, the market could fall
like a rock – sending a message to all that Trump's ideas are all wrong. But what if Hillary wins? I think that the Central Banksters will no
longer go out of their way to hold the market up, and will allow a prolonged
melt down. The U.S. suffers from
‘normalcy bias’ – the idea that since nothing bad has happened – it won’t.
On Friday the SEC's 2a-7 rule
went into effect. The timing of this is interesting as it is a post-2008 ruling
that effects what happens to money market funds when a lot of people would like
to withdraw their funds at the same time.
Money market funds are mandated to keep their NAV (Net Asset Value) at
par ($1 = 1 share). This can be
difficult on a large scale – especially in this negative interest rate environment. Fending off too many people trying to withdraw
their money will create enormous stresses on the system. This new rule allows the NAV to ‘float’ which
ultimately means that money invested in a money market fund could actually lose
value. The whole reason people park
money in money market funds is because it is safe. But wait, it gets worse. The rule states that in “times of excess
stress” funds can HALT redemptions completely for 10 days. CFO’s are already moving their money into Government
treasuries – that are NOT subject to the new rule including the redemption halt
rule.
For J. Q. Public, who
utilizes a money market as a part of his 401k strategy – the most important element
of that money market fund now becomes LIQUIDITY. For example: if you’re a fund manager running
401K's for 5,000 companies – in the past you could utilize any money market
fund because they were all simply required to meet the NAV test. With a floating NAV, it would be easy for a
particular money market fund to throw up the ‘halt redemption’ sign, and keep
people from getting their money for a period of 10 days. So liquidity becomes the most important test.
The timing of this rule is
interesting to me along with it being another way to get more people to buy
into Government treasuries. I wouldn't
be terribly nervous, except that it is just one more in a long string of
reasons why our financial system is creaking and groaning.
TIPS:
Make a New Year’s Eve resolution to review: http://www.usdebtclock.org on a regular basis. An interesting figure is that Total Unfunded
US Liabilities (including Social Security, Medicare Parts A, B and D, Federal
Debts held by the Public, and Federal and VA Benefits) currently exceed $103.8
Trillion.
I continue to get
questions on gold and silver. Allow me
to take another view of this from a more technical perspective known as the ‘Elliot
Wave Theory’. I recognize that there are
appropriate times to buy gold and silver and appropriate times to sell it. Right now, I believe we are being given
another low-risk opportunity to buy gold mining stocks and potentially double
our investment again over the next year.
By using the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) as the representative chart for this market,
I view the rally off the lows earlier this year as the 1st Wave in
the initial phase of a new bull market. That would mean this current pullback
would be classified as a Wave #2. Targets
for these second waves are often the .500-.618 retracement region of the prior
Wave 1 rally. That places our GDX bottoming
region between $19.80 and $22.10. We are
currently at 22.99. As long as this 19.80
to 22.10 region holds as support, I am looking for Wave #3 to take GDX to at
least the $51 region over the next year, with the potential to even extend
toward the $60 region. This ‘technical’
theory deals in probabilities rather than absolutes. Therefore, the first test the market must pass
is to have GDX remain over $19.80 for the next 10 days. Any break down below that region
significantly lowers the probabilities for this pattern set up. However, if we do hold that support, and
strongly break out over the August highs, the probabilities increase that we
will be heading over $50 quite quickly. So,
rather than listening to the news or theories about the election, approach the
market from using probabilities – so that you can make the appropriate investment
decision once you see how the market reacts over the next 10 days.
From a more fundamental
view there are a couple things you could do.
(a) You can sell your $20k investment for $70k and walk away with a
smile and a $50k profit. Or (b) examine the news:
-
Last week we had
gold go down due to a billion-dollar paper gold flush – perfectly timed for
when the Chinese gold exchange was closed.
-
Physical silver demand
continues to out-pace supply – especially with the continued emphasis on cell
phones and solar energy.
-
‘Silver
stackers’ continue to buy silver eagles and bars, and supply-demand situation
is actively engaged in a tug-of-war with the higher dollar.
-
The world is
shifting away from the U.S. dollar as its reserve currency to the SDR. China has been allowed into the SDR, and at
some point I expect them to begin backing a small percentage of their Yuan with
gold. Once they do that, there will be a
mad scramble for gold – because it will have the legitimacy of becoming ‘money’
again.
Suggestions:
-
FXE
– November Puts (bet on the Euro moving lower),
-
NVDA
– look for a move from 65 to 69,
-
Oil:
o
‘Short
term’ should continue to move higher simply due to the over concerns of supply
and demand.
o
When
oil gets between $55 and $60 per barrel, it will become more impacted by the dollar.
-
With
the impending Rate Hike:
o
Financials
should rally,
o
Bonds
should continue to roll-over and die,
o
The
U.S. Dollar should move higher,
o
Tech
stocks look tired, and
o
Consumer
stocks like Starbucks and Disney – look stronger to the downside due to higher
oil prices.
To
follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com
to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author,
R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any
reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in
complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
No comments:
Post a Comment