This Week in Barrons – 3-3-2013
Those feared words, “The U.S. Government
is here to Help”
A friend of mine – Paul M. (got
me thinking) and some CMU students asked me:
“Who ends up suffering due to the skyrocketing costs of higher
education?”
Factually:
- An average 4-year college education costs over
$100,000.
- 60% of students incur student loan debt – averaging
over $27,000.
- Professional degree loan debt is an additional
$100,000, with Doctors incurring over $200,000 in additional debt.
- State Universities can’t keep with infrastructure,
and (in many cases) have raised tuition over 80% in the past 3 years.
Combine
this with the housing bubble of 2008 (28% of current mortgages are still
underwater), and this gives us millions of new college graduates either
unemployed or underemployed, 60% carrying student loan debt, and their parents
with their largest asset virtually worthless.
But don’t worry, the U.S. Government is here to help – with the
Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).
The main reason Obamacare is going
to hurt our young people is that it will make them purchase health insurance,
even when the odds of them using it are low.
Currently 27% of 27 to 34 year olds do not carry health insurance. After January 1, 2014 – they will ALL have
to, or pay a fine/tax. Obamacare is
built on the premise that our young people are needed to purchase insurance and
NOT use it – so that their premiums will be available to pay for the care of
others (often much, much older). The
ONLY flaw in the plan is that our young people don’t have the money (unemployed
or underemployed). A single, 25 year-old
making $23,00 a year would need to pay 6.3% of their income ($1,449) to
Obamacare. This is $120 a month that
they don’t have and won’t use.
Adding insult to injury:
-
Approximately
60% of all personal bankruptcies in the United States are related to medical
bills. And approximately 41% of all
working age Americans have medical bill problems.
- According
to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the U.S. is currently
experiencing a shortage of at least 13,000 doctors, that will grow to a 130,000
doctor shortage in 10 years. Not
counting the fact that 40% of all doctors are over the age of 55.
- U.S.
ambulance industry makes more money each year than the movie industry.
- Approximately
10% of all U.S. employers plan to drop health coverage completely when the
major provisions of Obamacare go into effect in 2014.
- 16,000
new IRS agents are being hired to help oversee the implementation of Obamacare,
- Currently
there are more than 56 Million Americans on Medicaid, and under Obamacare 16 Million additional will be
added.
- Currently there are more than 50 Million
Americans on Medicare, and Obamacare will add an additional 23 Million by 2025.
The only nice ending to this is
to potentially invest in medical facility REITS (Real Estate Investment Trusts)
or other medical investments that pay a high dividend.
The Market...
“I know that it is painful. Anytime you buy something and it loses 10,
15, or 20% of its value, it makes you mad and then you question yourself. But always ask yourself the same basic
question: ‘What has changed?’ If
the answer is nothing, then the only thing I can logically surmise is that
while holding gold through this big dip is painful, I have to think that in the
end, it is the right thing to do.”
I wrote this in Barrons, of October 2006. In May of 2006, I was looking like a genius as gold hit $725 an ounce (up from $300). But by October it was trading at $560 – a drop of 22%. The story was a simple one. There was a housing bubble, a credit bubble and a debt bubble all brewing, and Gold was the only thing that made sense to own at the time. I bought MORE gold, and the rest is history.
Today is much different than 2006, and the reasons for owning gold are bigger than they were in 2006. Gold is the ‘anti-currency’ and the ultimate ‘money’. Money is a storage of value for our production. In order to store value, you need to be: rare, portable, divisible (make change), accepted universally as a medium of exchange, fungible – meaning it needs to possess the same value everywhere, and stand the test of time as a storage agent (it can’t be worth less next week).
I wrote this in Barrons, of October 2006. In May of 2006, I was looking like a genius as gold hit $725 an ounce (up from $300). But by October it was trading at $560 – a drop of 22%. The story was a simple one. There was a housing bubble, a credit bubble and a debt bubble all brewing, and Gold was the only thing that made sense to own at the time. I bought MORE gold, and the rest is history.
Today is much different than 2006, and the reasons for owning gold are bigger than they were in 2006. Gold is the ‘anti-currency’ and the ultimate ‘money’. Money is a storage of value for our production. In order to store value, you need to be: rare, portable, divisible (make change), accepted universally as a medium of exchange, fungible – meaning it needs to possess the same value everywhere, and stand the test of time as a storage agent (it can’t be worth less next week).
So if Gold it's not dead, why
is it struggling? First off, has
anything changed? Nope. On Tuesday The
Ben Bernanke told the banking committee that he was going to keep QE in effect
for a long time. But if The Ben Bernanke
is destroying our currency, shouldn't gold be going up? Yes it should be, and it is my bet that it
will again. But with the advent of Gold
ETF’s, we’ve allowed Central bankers (via paper currency) to manipulate the
price of the metal to make it look like there's no inflation. The same Central banks that are using the
paper market to drive metal prices lower, are then using the physical market to
BUY the metal itself.
So what happens? Either the illegal naked shorting, forward leasing, paper derivatives win the day and gold goes back down, or the physical demand outstrips supply, and coupled with the Central bank’s currency printing; prices rise in spite of the illegal activities. In 2006 I sided with the idea that nothing had changed and economic disaster was in the wings. Here in 2013 I suggest that we're still facing an economic disaster, coupled with a deranged Federal Reserve, who prints trillions as though it has no downside to it. While nothing is ever written in stone, and no investment is without risk, when the head of the biggest central bank on earth says he's going to keep printing currency, and we see Japan wanting in on the game, and we see Draghi in Europe suggesting that the ECB has a lot more to give, then I have no choice but to go with logic. I'm a buyer of metals on this dip.
So what happens? Either the illegal naked shorting, forward leasing, paper derivatives win the day and gold goes back down, or the physical demand outstrips supply, and coupled with the Central bank’s currency printing; prices rise in spite of the illegal activities. In 2006 I sided with the idea that nothing had changed and economic disaster was in the wings. Here in 2013 I suggest that we're still facing an economic disaster, coupled with a deranged Federal Reserve, who prints trillions as though it has no downside to it. While nothing is ever written in stone, and no investment is without risk, when the head of the biggest central bank on earth says he's going to keep printing currency, and we see Japan wanting in on the game, and we see Draghi in Europe suggesting that the ECB has a lot more to give, then I have no choice but to go with logic. I'm a buyer of metals on this dip.
Does the stock market deserve to be at All Time Highs? Nope – on Friday alone:
-
We had the sequester looming.
-
The PMI numbers out of China were
horrible.
-
U.S. incomes dropped the most in 20
years.
-
U.S. disposable income after taxes
took the biggest plunge since 1959.
-
AND U.S. GDP came in with virtually 0
growth!
I think the only thing that will stop this lunacy is if the velocity of money increases to the point where we finally get a huge surge of inflation. That would short circuit everything, and we would spiral downward quickly. As long as Bernanke is willing to dole out free money, and the banks aren't pumping it into the economy, this game of an ever-rising stock market stays intact.
In the next several days (with everyone and his brother looking for all time highs), the market could easily pull off a correction instead. So I’m still uncertain as to the direction of this market. My guess is that we take out the all time high, just so they can say they did, and then we finally roll over for a while. One tool you can use to try and decipher this mess is the XLF – the exchange traded fund (ETF) for the financial community. In rough terms, the market really can't go anywhere without the financials and the XLF is their barometer. If the XLF were to break up and over 18, then the rally would be intact. If the XLF were to fall below 17, one could surmise we were finally going to get our overdue correction.
Because of all this slop and chop, trying to get brave and go "too long" or get short – well, I think it best to just to let this congestion pass.
Tips:
The
past week we sold out of SPN (+1.00), PTEN (+4.00), MS (+3.50), and SPY
(+9.00).
My
current short-term holds are slim indeed and mostly underwater:
-
SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 18.25) – no stop
yet
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently
152.58) – no stop ($1,571.90 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 27.65)
– no stop ($28.45 per physical ounce).
To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades
– my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the
BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of
noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources
and those he interviews. You can learn
more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please write to <rfc@getabby.com>
to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock
trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter
follower - "taylorpamm" is my
handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action -
teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he
gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To unsubscribe please refer to the
bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for
information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer,
an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of,
or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not
registered and licensed brokers. This
message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is
intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute
an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice
can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering
document. Past performance is not
indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures
at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an
offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson
and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF
FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN
INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING
HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT
SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF
INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS
MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can
be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her
investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total
trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor
applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification
and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an
investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to
develop.
All material presented herein is
believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions
expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or
the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
No comments:
Post a Comment