RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, March 10, 2013

This Week in Barrons - 3-10-13


This Week in Barrons – 3-10-2013

"We all know this going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money" - Jim Cramer 3/5/2013

Jim Cramer said this, echoing Stanley Drukenmiller (famed investor) telling the morning crew on CNBC how bizarre things have gotten.  This has to be one of the most honest things Jim’s ever said.  And in the past week, quite a few people are looking around and asking: “My neighbors still don’t have real jobs, but the stock marketing is reaching all time highs.  How can that be?”  Considering the economic reports are dismal at best and horrid at worst, how can the market keep moving up?

The economy is in a spiral wormhole.  That is to say, if the Fed does not continually shoot juice into the system, our economy will go right down the toilet.  And to The Ben Bernanke’s credit, he’s made it clear that he will use "every manner possible, both conventional and non-conventional" to keep the economy from a deflationary depression.  Since they have admitted to us they will pull out all the stops, and do things that are NOT in their charter, it becomes a bit easier to understand why the stock market can do things (in the short term) that defy logic.

The money the Fed prints out of thin air is a lifeline.  It is like a heroin shot to a junkie.  It does not create demand.  It does not create fundamental economic soundness.  And (often) it chases away real investment.  This is why after years of bailouts, quantitative easing, and every manner of Fed maneuvering, we still have unemployment hovering at unacceptable levels and wages stagnant.  Monetary stimulus keeps things afloat, but it's not real growth.  And the second it stops so does the economy.

A short history lesson:  45 years ago the U.S. economy was an engineering and manufacturing powerhouse.  We could churn out more product of higher quality than anyone else in the world.  We exported that product the world over, and our country became rich.  But the ‘powers that be’ wanted a more global government, and (in a nutshell) they changed things.  It is NOT an accident when the largest manufacturing powerhouse in the world falls apart.  It is NOT an accident when the world's largest creditor nation is now the world's largest debtor.  We were changed into a consumption society.  Instead of becoming richer by exporting goods around the globe and taking in the profits, we are currently a service-focused society.  And now that the 45-year experiment in fiat currency is a failure, those same ‘powers that be’ have absolutely no choice but to continue to print, monetize and debase our currency.  Just last week The Ben Bernanke calmed and reassured Congress by telling them that he has no intention of pulling back the punch bowl.  That statement alone pushed us up and over the ‘all time highs’ on the DOW.  

But the issue with being a consumption society is that we need people to consume.  If people think that the economy is crumbling, they won't spend their money, and instead they will try and save it.  Which is exactly what they SHOULD do, but if people don’t spend – our economy falls apart.  So despite the truth, there is a necessity to continue the illusion that things are lovely in order that people spend money they really don't have, on things they really don't need.  

This gets more interesting with ‘The Wealth Effect.’  In 1999 several of us at CMU were thinking – Is the stock market a reflection of the economy or is the economy a reflection of the stock market?  Studies have confirmed that a rising stock market makes people feel better, wealthier, and spend more (The Wealth Effect); therefore, wouldn’t it make sense that causing the stock market to go up – would naturally help us avoid a recession / depression?  Factually, most Americans own their stocks in 401k plans – yet 97% of the 401k plans have no ability to ‘go short’ in the market.  So the only way Americans can make money in the market – is to have the stock market go up.  

Finally, let’s consider zero interest rates.  Does anyone really think that interest rates are at ZERO in order to stimulate the housing industry?  Rates are at zero to force ‘savers’ to put their money into ‘risk assets.’  It is sickening that folks saved all their lives and built positions of cash that should be returning them 6+%, and instead they’re getting 1%.  Inflation is eating them alive.  Even foreign governments and pension funds (that were happy getting 4 or 5% in our Treasuries), are now forced to buy dividend paying stocks.  And then, whenever the market finally does roll over and fall, the guru's will call for a ban on short selling.

And if anything (ever) does go wrong – well - after the market crash of ‘87, President Reagan created the "President’s Working Group on Capital Markets".  These are the big wheels of finance such as the treasury secretary, and the heads of the major investment banks.  Their charter allows them to find ways to improve the economy.  For the past several years, this group (affectionately referred to as the Plunge Patrol Team) buys billions of dollars worth of market futures whenever they want the market to rise.

So we are all witness to the single largest transfer of wealth this planet has ever encountered.  Remember the phrase, “Too Big to Jail.”  Attorney General Eric Holder, the top U.S. law-enforcement official, finally admitted this week that bank executives truly are above the law and may commit crimes with virtual impunity.  Appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Holder acknowledged under questioning by Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, that the megabanks are too big to jail.  “I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them,” Holder said. 

Remember Jim Cramer: “We all know this going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.”

The Market:

The market has gone up for 8 of the past 9 sessions – for approximately 600 points.  During that time we went ahead and punched through the all time highs of October 2007.  We ignored the vaunted sequestration.  We sidestepped Rand Paul's filibuster.  I don’t think anything can stop this train. 

After living thru the market "melt up" of 1999 – 2000, I never thought that I would see another one in my lifetime, but this run-up is eerily similar.
-       Back then companies with no earnings were gaining 50 points a week.  This time a Country with no earnings, savings and a debt load that is impossible to deal with, is gaining 50 points a day.
-       Back then Jim Cramer was telling us that it was a ‘brave new world’ where earnings didn’t matter.  Today Jim Cramer is telling us that the impending doom doesn't matter, so let’s make some money.
Is there a pattern here? 

On Friday I sold some of my short-term holdings.  It might turn out to be a stupid maneuver, but my feeling was that they were probably going to keep the market green on Friday in order to shout about how wonderful everything is over the weekend.  Then on Monday (after 6 up sessions) they begin to skim a little profit off the top.  Heck, even in the tech mania bubble we'd at least get pullbacks, and we’re sorely overdue for one now.

But what is the target of this particular bull run.  Since the DOW has punched through the last all time high, it has nothing to prove.  The S&P still hasn't hit its all time high of 1,565, but it seems fairly certain that we'll get those last 14 S&P points.  But what happens when both set all time highs, do we just continue higher?  After all, we are witness to a Central Banker with a printing press – who is using it to the tune of $85 Billion per MONTH.  On that alone, there’s no reason that this market can’t go up another 2, 3, or 4 THOUSAND points.  But:
-       What if more Cities in the US (like Detroit) start to implode?
-       What if global currency activities push rates up?
-       What if The Ben Bernanke increases his money printing from $85 Billion to $100 Billion to reign in these rates?
-       Isn't it at least theoretically possible that the market continues to go up, and up, and up beyond anyone's imagination?

This is going to end badly, but in the meantime, virtually anything could happen.  We could certainly go up for the next two years with just the tiniest of 4% corrections now and again.  Or the velocity of money could increase and inflation could break out.  Only two things will stop this market: (a) when The Ben Bernanke lets off the gas pedal, or (b) when Inflation breaks out and begins its push for "hyper".

I think we may get a little down ‘wiggle’ on Monday, but I suspect any dip will get bought and we'll see that S&P high within a few weeks.  We are all forced to lean long into this, despite knowing we're doing it for all the wrong reasons.

Tips:

The past week we sold out of HFC (+2.00), AXP (+1.50), and ADSK (+0.40).  I’m watching SNDK over 52.10, CMI over 120.00, COST over 104.00, CLF over 25.00, and JOY over 63.00.

My current short-term holds are slim indeed and mostly underwater:
-       DE – in at 89.39 (currently 90.63) – stop at entry
-       SBUX – in at 56.99 (currently 58.61) – stop at 57.50
-       SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 18.24) – no stop yet
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 152.57) – no stop ($1,576.60 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 27.99) – no stop ($28.90 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! 

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@getabby.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference .

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson



No comments:

Post a Comment