In many ways, Softbank, WeWork, FTX, Sam ‘Bank-Run’-Fried, VC’s, SPAC's, and Crypto founders – were all in the right place at the right time. Per HL: “They knew how to work the refs, the clocks, and ‘some fans’ – but now reality has returned.” Our government threw in some performance enhancers such as: 0% interest rates and free money – but those are mostly gone now. In 2022, business and investing are open and more level to everyone. 2022 re-introduced ‘fundamentals’ to your daily routine. The reward for doing your homework is the result itself. You’re Doing what you Love – and Love what you’re Doing. It’s an easy formula. Maybe that’s why so few ever get it right?
The Market:
Learning how VC’s think? I don’t think I ever appreciated how differently VC’s think – until I asked one (+40 years ago) whether they would lease or buy their next car? They turned to me and said: “It really depends upon the interest rate.” Huh? What about the monthly payment, the price, the residual, and my list went on? They turned to me and said (again): “Incorporate all of those elements into the rate, and let me know.” It seems that it’s: “all about ‘dat rate.”
Fast forward and per FW: “VCs still invest via the interest rate method. For example, in real estate you would like to generate an annual yield on your investment (acquisition + construction costs) of between 5% and 10%. In P/E speak – you’re looking at between 10- and 20-times earnings. If you’re investing in young companies, you would require a higher rate of return of about 26% compounded (10x on your money) and in more mature companies about 17.5% (5x return on your money) over ten years.”
How do you decide on whether to invest in Google or a building? Google has a market cap of $1.25T, and is down 30% YTD. It generates $70B of net income/year, and $80B of free-cash-flow. If Google were a building, it would be returning an annual yield of 6.4% ($80B / $1.25T) and a PE of about 18x. [Right in the middle of the 5 to 10% range.] Would I rather own Google at 6.4% or a building in my neighborhood – it’s a tossup right now.
A 6.4% annual return compounded, doubles your money over 10 years, and 3.5x’s your money over 20 years. Many of the top tech companies have lost between 30% to 80% of their value over the past year. Does that mean that they’ve bottomed and are good investments? Maybe. But the question you should be asking is: Which company do I think is going to make me between 5 and 10% on my investment for the next 10 years? Think of everything as a rate of return. If the resulting interest rate falls between 5 and 10% - then invest in it. If the rate is below the threshold – then find someplace else to put your money. So, in terms of lease vs buy? It’s not about the price, the monthly payment, or the residual… “It’s all about ‘dat rate.”
InfoBits:
- Employers plan to boost wages by over 4% next year… but with inflation at 8% - that ‘boost’ may feel more like a dent.
- Embark, a developer of autonomous driving technology for trucks… has gone from $5B to worthless in a year. Not quite FTX – but getting there.
- Apple #1… could see a production shortfall of almost 6m iPhone Pro models due to the unrest in China.
- Apple #2… has “mostly stopped” advertising on Twitter. Apple was Twitter’s #1 advertiser ($48m) in Q1 of this year.
- Apple #3 … Elon Musk claimed that Apple threatened to remove Twitter from the App Store. Elon: whatever happened to ‘The Golden Rule’?
- A 4-day (no-pay-cut) work week is here… in test mode only.
- A record 197m US shoppers… visited stores over the extended holiday weekend, spending an average of $325 each.
- Germany has signed a 15-year deal… with Qatar to receive liquified natural gas (LNG) from Qatar Energy and ConocoPhillips.
- The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI)… showed that U.S. manufacturing contracted in October for the first time since June 2020.
- It’s the H-Hour for EV taxes: The Inflation Reduction Act requires EVs to be mostly US-made to get $7.5k in tax credits. Now, the EU, UK, South Korea, and Japan are all claiming discrimination. Don’t make me laugh.
- Winc, an internet wine subscription company… filed for bankruptcy just over a year after going public. What were they doing as a public company?
- Tesla delivered its first all-electric semitrailer truck to PepsiCo… marking the company’s long-delayed product expansion.
- Have you tried OpenAI’s new ChatGPT yet? Its natural language technology allows users to ask questions, just like a search engine – only it just gives you ONE right answer. Can you say… Google Who?
Crypto-Bytes:
- On the same day BlockFi declared bankruptcy… they also filed suit against Sam ‘Bank-Run’-Fried (SBF) to reclaim stock shares in Robinhood that the FTX founder pledged as a backstop. SBF make it stop.
- Genesis Global Capital, another crypto lender that dealt with FTX… is also at risk of filing for bankruptcy and has halted customer withdrawals
- U.S.-based crypto exchange Kraken… is laying off 1,100 people.
- SBF said that… (a) he regretted stepping down and FTX filing for bankruptcy, (b) he denied implementing a “backdoor” between Alameda and FTX, and (c) he told his former lawyers to “go f**k themselves.”
- Tom Emmer, Co-chair of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus… said: “FTX’s collapse is not a failure of crypto, but a failure of centralized finance and Sam Bank-Run-Fried.”
- SBF said that… (a) he mis-accounted for about $8B of FTX’s funds, (b) he did not knowingly commit any crimes, and (c) he did not knowingly comingle investor funds with his own. He’s using the word ‘knowingly’ too much for my liking!
TW3 (That Was - The Week - That Was):
Wednesday: Jerome Powell is speaking today at 1:30pm. Mortgage apps fell another 0.8%. The German Food CPI jumped 21% YoY in November, and that's the highest reading - EVER. The ADP report is ugly. Manufacturing lost 100k jobs, and it appears like they all became bartenders & servers. GDP was much hotter than anticipated at 2.9%.
Wow, J. Powell is a lot better at this game than his predecessors. He threaded the needle and the more he talked – the more he muddied the waters.
- Our FED will slow the pace of rate hikes in December, but have a “longer way to go” in bringing down inflation.
- The final rate will be “higher than previously projected” and housing services will fall in 2023
So, we’ll see 50bps hikes starting in December. But, he is not going to stop very soon, and if/when he does – he will not be fast to pivot towards cutting. The market loved what he had to say, and I think we have a green light UNTIL Dec. 14 – the next FOMC meeting. By that time, we could have a much hotter CPI (Dec. 13 release) than people expect. At which point, I suspect that the FOMC won’t like the print, will stick to 50bps, but will be much tougher in their words.
Jobs Friday: We were expecting 200K jobs, and got 263K jobs – with October’s data being revised higher. Wages were up 0.6%, and we were expecting 0.3%. A strong labor market means strong wage growth. Strong wage growth means higher services inflation, and higher services inflation means continued upward pressure on the Fed’s preferred inflation metric. It seems as if all of the previous interest rate hikes are not producing the required results. I like the look of IAC. It’s over its 50-day, and if the market stages a comeback, keep an eye on it.
AMA (Ask Me Anything…)
The Jobs Report: According to the official statement, we created 263,000 jobs last month – much higher than the estimates. Inside the report, wages rose 0.6% - much higher than the expected 0.3%. The market tanked on the news - fearing many more FED rate hikes. But WHY did the market rally back on Friday?
Factually: (a) Wages rose 0.6%, (b) the Civilian Labor Force declined = -186,000, (c) the People Leaving the Labor Force increased = +359,000, and (d) our Total Actual Employed decreased = -138,000.
Summary: Once people reviewed the detail, they realized that it didn’t add up to the headline release. That’s why the market rallied back on Friday – Case Closed!
Next Week: Are Markets being Data Manipulated…
A Data-Manipulated Market… produced a few terrifying moments – resulting in an unchanged market. We are channeling within a fairly tight range – all while touting a +20 VIX. With a +20 VIX, we should be rock-n-rolling a lot more than we are – but the DATA is holding us back. Just when we get a little too stretched (one way or another), the data pulls us back into the range. You wonder if the market is being manipulated by the data? For example, on Friday AM’s Jobs Report: we dropped 80 S&P points inside of 1 minute – only to claw our way back throughout the day. This is NOT a good situation for traders.
Costco is a litmus test for Retail… and it isn’t going well. No amount of FED speak could have saved Costco when they presented bad news last week. COST had a huge (+4 standard deviation) move (to the downside) last Thursday due to Costco specific news. It’s difficult picking a directional bias in a data-manipulated market. Heck, Bridgewater Capital just announced that it gave back all of its profits for the year – during these last 2 months of Data Manipulated Markets.
What will we do next week? The next big data point is December 13th (CPI release), and our FOMC meeting results will be announced on December 14th.
Sectors: The S&Ps ended the week mildly higher along with Tech (QQQ). However, the Financials (XLF) and Energy (XLE) ended the week mildly lower. Tip #2: Keep an eye on this sector rotation as the Q’s could easily pick up steam into EOY.
Trades:
- Tip #3 = XLP… going lower … Retail’s in trouble. It’s been on the Upper-Edge of its EM for the past 4 weeks, and nothing is that strong in the marketplace.
- Tip #4 = SBUX… going lower … SBUX follows where the XLP leads. Short last week’s 2 std. deviation move. The consumer is in trouble.
- Tip #5 = AGG … going higher … there is no bear market in BONDS !!
SPX Expected Move (EM):
- Last week’s EM = $76… we had Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride last week, but we finished the week $30 higher. We had a 150-point move (from low to high) and only finished mildly unchanged due to Jerome Powell’s speech.
- Next week’s EM = $67… with expectations this small, I would buy short-dated premium at a 14% implied volatility, and finance it by selling longer dated (24%) premium way outside of the expected move. Just sayin’.
Tips:
Personally, I’m erring on the side of safety and capital preservation. Bonds (AGG), Gold & Silver (physical), land, Food (KGR), and physically powering via Solar are looking good to me.
HODL’s: (Hold On for Dear Life)
- PHYSICAL COMMODITIES = Gold @ $1,811 /oz. & Silver @ $23.35 /oz.
- AGG – BOT more & more bonds (AGG = $99 / in at $93)
- **Bitcoin (BTC = $17,000 / in at $4,310)
- **Ethereum (ETH = $1,250 / in at $310)
- EGY ($5.39 / in at $5.30)
- GME – DRS’d and HODL
- GS (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Jan / +$340 / -$330 PUT Spread
- IBM (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Jan / +$130 / -$120 PUT Spread
- Innerscope (INND = $0.008 / in at $0.0052)
- NFLX (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Jan / +$275 / -$265 PUT Spread
- RIG ($4.19 / in at $3.47)
- SBUX (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Jan / +$85 / -$75 PUT Spread
- SPY (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Dec 16 / +$357 / - $347 SPY PUT Spread
o BOT Dec 16 / $285 DIA PUT
- VTV ($146 / in at $143)
- XLP (Downside PUTS):
o BOT Jan / +$77.5 / -$75.5 PUT Spread
Follow me on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.
If you'd like to view R.F.'s actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a StockTwits follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If you'd like to see R.F. in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
Creativity = https://youtu.be/n2QiPSe_dKk
Investing = https://youtu.be/zIIlk6DlSOM
Marketing = https://youtu.be/p0wWGdOfYXI
Sales = https://youtu.be/blKw0zb6SZk
Startup Incinerator = https://youtu.be/ieR6vzCFldI
To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
No comments:
Post a Comment