This Week in Barrons – 5-15-2016:
After seeing the movie ‘Money Monster’, I’m trying to get my arms around today’s plight of the U.S. manufacturing worker. Verizon is a great example of flat or declining worker pay combined with continued outsourcing of jobs as a result of NAFTA and other free trade agreements in our manufacturing sector. SF reminded me that we are both old enough to remember when manufacturing employees had pensions and a livable wage. Currently Verizon (VZ) workers are on strike while VZ corporate continues to outsource manufacturing to low-wage, non-union contractors in Mexico, the Philippines and the Dominican Republic.
How much can Verizon save by moving jobs to Mexico you ask? If it is at all similar to the auto sector, Verizon can save $50 per HOUR per WORKER by sending jobs ‘south-of-the-border’. GM reports that their workers in Mexico earn wages and benefits of $26 per DAY (less than $4 an HOUR) – while autoworkers in the U.S. earn (with benefits) between $50 and $55 per hour. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-06-09/gm-ford-to-accelerate-growth-at-mexico-plants-where-workers-get-26-a-day.
After watching ‘Money Monster’, I asked myself: “Why didn’t Verizon (VZ) shifted their jobs to Mexico prior to 2016?” After all, this wage discrepancy just didn’t pop-up over night. But shifting jobs to Mexico is a risky move. When analyzing decisions I always start with the financials. Verizon revenues have been flat to growing at 4% per year. However, they borrowed $52B in 2013 / 2014 in order to buy-back almost $60B (25%) of their own stock. They chose buying back stock and increased officer compensation over: increased R&D, capital improvements, and paying a competitive wage to their workers. One of the consequences of that decision is the necessity of VZ to dramatically lower costs (shift jobs to Mexico) in order to save enough money to meet stockholder expectations and to pay back those stock buyback loans. You see if VZ’s stock does NOT continue to increase in price, borrowing money to buy more of IT could be viewed as doubling-down in Vegas - an inept decision and potential grounds for dismissal of the officers.
Ms. Yellen, I’ve talked endlessly about the ‘unintended consequences’ of keeping interest rates low for extended periods of time (ZIRP), and the obvious incentives it gives corporations to borrow tremendous amounts of debt at near zero rates. What we’re seeing is that everyone has their price – even corporate CEOs. If we allow corporations to ridiculously compensate their officers (at the expense of the workers) – they will. Because of their officer’s personal greed, the ONLY choice left to Verizon is to absorb the risk of moving manufacturing to Mexico. They have boxed themselves into a decision-making corner – where the only way out is risky movement of their manufacturing to Mexico. Their officers will rationalize this as a cost-cutting move, but (mark my words) it was a move caused by ZIRP and personal greed. Ms. Yellen, you cannot control personal greed, but you can control ZIRP.
I understand it’s an election year, and you would like to keep your job. But for the sake of doing what’s right, and for the sake of the American worker – would you please continue to raise interest rates, allow the markets to correct, invite investing in corporate fundamentals back into the picture, and eventually bring our manufacturing jobs BACK to the U.S? It pains me to say this Ms. Yellen, but if you don’t – President Trump will.
Have you noticed the number of bankruptcies in the oil sector this year? The following graphic spells it out better than I ever could. If you wonder why the financial sector is weak, you need look no further than who’s loaning money to these bankrupt oil companies.
Factual Top 10:
- #1 Total business sales have been declining for nearly two years, and are now down 15% from late 2014.
- #2 Corporate earnings have declined for four consecutive quarters, and S&P profits are down 7.1% quarter over corresponding quarter. This never happens outside of a recession.
- #3 April’s commercial bankruptcies were up 32% and Chapter 11 filings increased 67% over the same period last year.
- #4 U.S. rail traffic was 11% lower last month than during the corresponding period in 2015.
- #5 Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that U.S. firms announced 35% more job cuts during April than during March. So far this year, job cuts are running 24% above 2015.
- #6 U.S. GDP grew at just a 0.5% rate during the first quarter of 2016. This was the third consecutive time that GDP has declined compared to the previous quarter.
- #7 Barack Obama is poised to become the first U.S. President to never have a single year when the economy grew by more than 3%.
- #8 Half of the population couldn't find $400 for an emergency without selling or borrowing something. 51% of the people have no retirement savings, and 1 in 4 families receive Government assistance.
- #9 Carl Icahn is 150% net short this stock market. He is convinced we're staring at a 20% decline or more. Smart money has now fled the market for the longest stretch in history.
- #10 The Fed has said publicly "Falling asset prices could produce systemic risk". Translated: If stocks fall, it could blow up the system!
Friday broke a pattern that could become important. On most Friday's (no matter how red the market was) the Central Banks would magically levitate the market to where it was either green (or almost green) for the close. That was done to make the market look healthy for the weekend TV shows. But last Friday, that pattern was broken. At 1 pm the S&P was a bit red, hovering around 2058, and instead of the customary late Friday rally, the Central Banks allowed it to roll over, and we ended the day down 17 S&P points. We closed WELL below the S&P 50-day moving average – which is never a good sign for the bulls.
Now this is where things get really interesting. While the 50-day moving average is psychologically important, technically – it doesn't carry nearly the weight that it used to in years gone by. It (therefore) isn't the end of the world that the S&P lost it’s 50-day moving average level. It does (however) become a little more interesting because the DOW also lost its 50-day moving average. So we have both major indices UNDER their respective important levels.
The real test for the S&P however will be at the 2040 level. If you look back to the beginning of April, you will see no less than 6 days in a row, where that level held as support. That is significant. If we lose 2040 on a closing basis, you can pretty much redraw the charts, and we will be in ‘no question’ correction territory.
Friday we closed at 2046. I’m sure on Monday that the Central Banks will step up to the plate and do whatever they can to keep things higher. But the struggle is becoming epic, and right now it feels like the Central Banks are going to fail. For this week I think we're going to see the market bounce along that 2040 level – trading sideways like those 6 days in early April. But then, if we don't see a lot of buy back action, or some more central bank buying – we are heading lower.
What about a bounce? Could we instead get a mindless romp higher like we did this past Tuesday? Absolutely, but I think that it will fade out just like the previous one did. The ONLY thing keeping this market up is FUNNY MONEY, and even that's not having the same effect. As always, be careful out there.
Congrats to all who have followed our AG trade – it’s currently up over 900%. I will be introducing a new trade next week, similar to that one.
- Long various mining stocks: AG, AUY, DRD, EGO, FFMGF, FSM, GFI, IAG, KGC, and PAAS,
- Long an oil supplier: REN @ $0.56,
- Buy FB – May – Butterfly centered around $120,
- Sold RGR – May – Put Credit Spread – 55 / 60,
- Long RUT – May – Butterfly – 1000 / 1080 / 1130,
- Long TLT – May – Call Debit Spread – 128 / 133,
To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <email@example.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <>.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:
To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://>
Until next week – be safe.