This Week in Barrons – 3-13-2016:
"We injected cocaine and heroin into the system to create a wealth effect.” … Richard Fisher (former Dallas FED member)
This week, when former Dallas FED member Richard Fisher admitted on CNBC that the FED: “Injected cocaine and heroin into the system to create a wealth effect” – your jaw must have hit the floor. He continued explaining that the FED went ‘ALL IN’ pushing markets higher, hoping for a ‘wealth effect’ where everyone would be willing to spend because ‘on paper’ they were feeling wealthy. And finally he said: “Due to all of the QE, money printing, stimulus and twists – we created huge economic disconnects.” But at some point this became ineffective, and like heroin to a junkie (where you need to constantly increase the dosage or you don't get the same high) – they ran out of bullets. Now, you have the perfect right to be surprised that your policies aren’t working, but NOT that they’re being made public – especially now. Given this is the first time in history that a single President (Obama) has appointed ALL of the FED governors – you must be scared that come November, you could be looking for work?
That’s especially true if ‘The Donald’ means what he says – and starts bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. After all, SF was nice enough to share with me the economic numbers that came out of Rockland, NY this week. It seems that this month (according to the Bureau of Labor & Statistics) the top average weekly wage gain (in sizeable counties) went to Rockland, NY for producing an average weekly wage gain of $3,170! Yes Rockland, NY: population 323,000, 31% Jewish, 77% white, 13% African American, 30% with incomes below the U.S. average – produced a 220% weekly wage gain simply by restarting a manufacturing plant. So when ‘The Donald’ speaks of bringing manufacturing BACK to the U.S. – think in terms of increasing payrolls over 200% - adding an additional $12,000 per month to someone’s salary.
Remember when the Democrats and Republicans were planning on running Hillary Clinton against Jeb Bush, and having the best puppet win? Remember when ‘The Donald’ was a presumed ‘flash in the pan’? Remember when he was termed a loud-mouthed, rude, politically incorrect individual – looking for a few minutes in front of a TV before he would fade off into the great casino in the sky? And now, we have the establishment ‘freaking out’ over him winning. In the single largest push that I’ve ever witnessed, Hollywood along with mainstream media, tech moguls, athletes and even Mitt Romney have come out warning America against ‘The Donald’. Why? I think Newt Gingrich said it best during an interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly: "He's an outsider. He's not them. He's not part of the club. He's uncontrollable. He has not been through the initiation rites. He does not belong to the secret society."
The GOP party has publicly admitted that they are trying to take down him down, and swing the nomination to someone who ‘stands for the party’. Their plan (if ‘The Donald’ continues his winning ways) is to try and do an ‘end run’ behind the backs of the American people, and appoint Mitt Romney at the Convention. I remember that famous quote from Josef Stalin: “The people who CAST the votes decide nothing. The people who COUNT the votes decide everything.”
Ms. Yellen, I bring all this up because history IS going to repeat itself. According to everyone I listen to, the next crash will either be ‘pretty bad’ or ‘epic in nature’. Everyone knows that the stock market is manipulated via QE and buybacks, and that the world is really insolvent. We continue to kick the can down the road by inventing new programs such as ‘negative’ interest rates and now allowing Central Banks to buy stocks. Even Bernie Madoff admits that the best ponzi scheme will eventually fail. Your system uses equities as collateral for more derivative creation. You need the market up so that ‘The Street’ can continue to create more debt.
Heck, higher oil prices only happened because banks were about to see their loan portfolios implode due to idled oil fields. Therefore (wink-wink) you increased oil prices so that the frackers, drillers and banks would be given time to renegotiate their loans. As the oil operators were going ‘bankrupt’, banks were being forced to take ownership of the oil fields. But because of environmental regulations, you can't just cease all activity and walk away from an oil well. Wells need to be properly capped, cleaned-up, and any materials that could leach into the groundwater – removed. Banks wanted no part of that. So the easy solution was to manipulate oil prices higher (in the short run), in order to keep oil patch loans from going sour and dragging down hundreds of banks. Once all of the loans get reworked, then the price of oil will again drift lower.
Ms. Yellen, you hear the people screaming at the top of their lungs as much as I do. They are tired of the establishment, and the establishment is running scared. I wouldn’t be surprised if 6 months from now, you were on the other end of ‘The Donald’ saying: “You’re Fired.”
In the last month we've seen the S&P go from a low of 1810 to 2022. I remember November of 2007 when Jim Cramer was telling all of his listeners: “Yes, the market looks extended, but this rally isn't over by a long shot, and I'm telling you to buy-buy-buy!" Then the market fell like a rock.
Last year, Europe (under Mario Draghi) introduced their version of QE (to stimulate growth) by initiating a 60B Euro per month bond buying program. More recently they lowered deposit rates to a NEGATIVE 0.3%. The results never materialized. So on Thursday, Mario Draghi ‘doubled down’ on policies that did NOT work the first time. He cut rates even further into negative territory, increased the amount of bond buying from 60B to 80B Euros per month, extended the time frame, and announced a new initiative to buy corporate bonds.
At first, markets went wild, but instead of Germany, Europe and the U.S. continuing higher – they reversed and went lower. It seems that the ‘establishment’ had it all figured out. Draghi would unleash a bazooka full of money, the Euro currency would fall like a rock, and stocks would soar to new heights. However, their plan backfired. By going in that aggressively, instead of everyone rejoicing – investors said ‘holy crap, things must be much worse than we thought’ and ‘sold the news’.
Even the citizens of Germany and Sweden awoke from their socialist slumber. Think about it. Company A creates a debt note. The ECB buys that debt note directly from the company. Company A can now: (a) hire more workers, (b) expand their business, or (c) vote themselves more executive options and use the ECB’s money to buy back their own stock to inflate their own stock price. What do you think they will do? Factually: 20% of all stock exchange volume is being consumed by stock buy-backs. Legally, stock buy-backs CANNOT occur 5 weeks prior to, and 2 days following a company’s earnings release.
In creating the chart below, I mapped the downturns (with orange lines) over the past 18 months in the index. Honestly, they seemed a little ‘too regular’ for my taste. What you’ll see is that these downturns occur (to the day) during the period when corporations are NOT ALLOWED to buy-back their own stock. It seems that without corporate demand – there’s virtually NO demand.
Therefore, if you wish to participate in a particular corporation’s stock rally:
A. Be conscious of the 5-week window prior to earnings.
B. Go to PowerShares Buyback Achievers Portfolio = https://www.invesco.com/portal/site/us/financial-professional/etfs/product-detail?productId=PKW
C. Go to ‘View All Top Holdings’ = https://www.invesco.com/portal/site/us/financial-professional/etfs/holdings/?ticker=PKW
D. Group by ‘Percentage of the Fund’
E. Build a watch list of your stock’s buy-backs & earnings dates.
F. And when there is a massive sell-off in a favorite stock, simply review whether a company is within their 5 week window:
a. If YES, then do not purchase until after earnings,
b. If NO, then purchase the stock for a quick rally as these companies will quietly out-perform
The markets ARE the economy. China’s imports and exports have fallen to 2009 lows. If the markets roll over like they did in 2008, the crash will be worse than 2008 and 1929 combined. I believe that this week’s Draghi maneuver was pretty much the ECB being ‘ALL IN’. There's really not much left to be done. Never before has the world seen: (a) negative interest rates, (b) Central banks buying stock, futures and corporate debt, and (c) $700T in derivatives. From Abe in Japan, to Draghi in Europe, to the stimulus injections in China, to the years of QE and ZIRP in the U.S. – I think they've shot all of their legitimate ammo.
I can see this run taking us up into the S&P 2100 level. The one remaining issue in the way of this melt-up is Janet Yellen. This week the FED will hand us their decision on interest rates. If the FED is NOT as ‘dovish’ as the street wants, that could ding the whole rally. And if the FED believes in the strength of our economy, and sets the table for another hike, then that would put the brakes on this rally for sure. It’s truly an exciting time to be an investor. We are watching policies never seen before – unfold right in front of our eyes.
I think there's a lot of opportunity coming on the downside. If I'm right, we will all need to: learn how to ‘short’, explore the inverse ETF's like DOG, SH, RWM, PSQ, and learn how to use put options. Markets traditionally take the ‘stairs up’, and the ‘elevator down’. I think we're getting close to one of those times.
For those of you participating with me in the AG mining play – congratulations, you’re up over 30% YTD.
- Long various mining stocks: AG, AUY, EGO, GFI, IAG, and FFMGF,
- Long an oil supplier: REN @ $0.56,
- Long GLD – Mar – Call Debit Spread – 115 / 120,
- Long NKE – Mar – Call – 67.5,
- Sold RUT – Mar – Call Credit Spread – 1100 / 1105,
- Sold SPX – Mar – Call Credit Spread – 2025 / 2030,
- Long SPX – 1925 – March / + April Calendar spread,
- Long SPX – 2025 – March / + April Calendar spread,
- Sold TEX – Apr – Put Credit Spread – 19 / 20, and
- Long TSN – Mar / Apr – 62.5 Calendar
To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <email@example.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <>.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:
To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://>
Until next week – be safe.