RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, January 10, 2016

This Week in Barrons - 1-10-2016

This Week in Barrons – 1-10-2016:


“Let Me Entertain You” = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSJfkLXaayg 

Dear. Ms. Yellen:

I’m reminded of what Jimmy Cayne (previous CEO of Bear Sterns) once said about Wayne Angell (his Chief Economist): “Economists are right only 35 to 40% of the time.  I think that he is mostly entertainment, but he probably doesn't think so.  Wayne travels a lot, visits people, after all – he is an entertainer."

Mr. Cayne didn’t even pay lip service to the idea that Bear Sterns' clients were entitled to the firms best efforts based upon their superior research.  For Mr. Cayne, the goal was simply to be entertaining enough to make sales.  So as we dive into Wall Street's forecasts and predictions, remember that many on Wall Street are only there to entertain you, and get you to part company with your money.

To start the week, Mr. Richard Fisher (former head of the Dallas FED & former FED Co-Chair) came on CNBC this week and said: "We (the FED) front-loaded an enormous market rally from 2009 onward, in order to create the wealth effect.  For too many years everyone wanted the FED to lift all boats.  Now, that's over and people are going to have to go back to fundamental analysis.  The kind of work that used to be done – looking at individual companies to see if a company (on it's own) can grow its bottom line and increase shareholder value.”

Ms. Yellen, what I’m hearing from Mr. Fisher is that the FED can only fuel spending at a pace faster than private sector growth for so long.  Eventually either you top out, or private sector growth catches up and continues to fund the spending spree.  Of course the third option is the FED injects yet another round of uber-stimulus (QE, ZIRP, TALF, Operation Twist, etc.).  After all, the rest of the world is accelerating their ‘stimulus to prosperity’ policy – why not the U.S?  Given you’re a Keynesian and this administration strongly dislikes the pain of financial responsibility – I’m assuming that your next move is ‘Stimulus 5’ – yes?

But recently I noticed that a law was passed outlawing the FED from saving a failing bank.  Excuse me, but there are $700 Trillion in derivatives floating around out there.  That means that the next banking collapse is Uncle Sam's problem.  With Uncle Sam being broke, that leaves the bank depositors on the hook for the collapse.  Oops, (I forgot) due to another law, the minute I deposit money into a bank – it ceases to be MY money.  It’s all beginning to make sense to me now.  Under the new law, when a bank fails – the depositors will lose all of their money and will become completely dependent upon Uncle Sam for handouts.  Got it!

Lastly Ms. Yellen, I’m beginning to hear talk of a potential U.S. recession in 2016.  A key recessionary indicator is U.S. trucking tonnage, and that has been down 3 out of the last 4 months – and down 6 out of the last 11 months.  The last time that we saw this significant of a fall off was during the 2008-2009 recession.  Combine this with ‘mixed’ holiday sales, stagnant wage growth, and a low employment participation rate – it doesn’t bode well for private sector growth.  You do know that 2016 is a Presidential election year, and a recession would all but guarantee a change in governmental leadership – yes?  And often what comes with a change in governmental leadership is a change in FED leadership – yes?  I’m thinking that you are hoping for stagnant economic growth, and betting that market volatility is more than the long-term investor can stomach.  I have to hand it to you; I haven’t seen this much ‘market entertainment’ in years.  If that was your goal for starting 2016 – I can’t wait to see how November plays out.

The Market

This week we saw the December Jobs Report offer some good news in a sea of weak economic data.  It seems that in December, we created 290,000+ jobs, when only 200,000 were expected.  Now December also gave us weak holiday sales in many sectors, sharp manufacturing declines, reduced shipping tonnage, fewer exports (widening the trade deficit), contracting corporate profit growth, and 4th quarter earnings that could be significantly weaker than anticipated.

What I find silly is that the December Jobs Report is already fueling ‘FED rate hike’ talks.  Talks like this will only drive more volatility into the market.  And as the report continues to sink in, and talks of the next FED rate hike grow louder – the market will accept a rate hike as being bad news.  The market really wants ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) so that corporations can continue to leverage and push up asset prices.  Higher interest rates translate to:
-       Higher mortgage rates (stalling the housing market),
-       Higher borrowing costs (cutting spending),
-       Higher carrying costs (reducing leverage in the market), and
-       Declining bonds so yields can rise (increasing savings).
All of the above make it more difficult for the market to rally.

This week, China proved that they do not understand the technology, timing, and/or algorithms surrounding the use of market circuit breakers.  2 days this past week, Chinese trading was suspended due to circuit breakers tripping within an hour of their market’s open.  Presumably, they have suspended circuit breakers completely (which is not the right answer either), but we will see how their markets react next week.

Are we ever going to go back to the days when the ‘average, hard-working person’ can live their life in peace, be kind to their friends and neighbors, raise their 2 kids and a dog, buy the picket fence – and just enjoy life?  How is J.Q. Public ever going to believe that everyone is NOT out to get him?  After seeing the movie “The Big Short” (which I highly recommend), he now realizes that not only is the market ‘rigged’, but the Big Banks and the FED both ‘swindled’ him.  This week the Nevsky Capital hedge fund closed shop – not because they bet the farm on something that didn't work, but rather in their words: “Data releases have become much less transparent and truthful at both a macro and a micro level.  At a macro level the key issue is the ever-increasing importance of China and India. China is the world's second largest economy, but already much larger than the US in a broad swathe of sectors.  India will be the world's third largest economy within a decade.  Unfortunately … the most important data they produce is simply not credible.  This obfuscation and distortion of data, whether deliberate or inadvertent, makes it increasingly difficult to forecast macro and hence micro as well, for an ever growing share of our investment universe.

The unintended consequences of new regulations have given rise to falling equity market volumes, and a dramatic rise in individual stock volatility.  To mix metaphors: butterflies flapping their wings now regularly create hurricanes that stop out fundamentally driven investors who cannot remain solvent longer than the market can remain irrational.  Less disclosure means more risk, and instant downside risk on both longs and shorts has become immeasurably larger.

In summary, all of the above factors now mean that it is more difficult than ever before for us to accurately forecast macroeconomic and corporate variables.  This has made what we enjoy most - the thrill of analyzing economic data releases and company accounts - no longer enjoyable.  We are confident our process will eventually work again - for the laws of economics will never be repealed - but for now they are suspended and may be for some time; an indefinite period involving indeterminate levels of risk during which we think it would be wrong for us to be the stewards of your money.”

Bottom line – Nevsky Capital is telling the world that the market is rigged, manipulated and controlled.

By taking a ‘hawkish’ stance on raising interest rates, the Fed is playing a dangerous game.  In 2015, rate hike expectations drove the dollar higher, and created disinflation.  China (after last weeks currency devaluations and a stock market plunge) has become public enemy number one.  In reaction, our market has peeled off an incredible 158 S&P points and 1,404 DOW points in just 7 sessions.  Right now we're in ‘Correction Mode’, but eventually we are going to be in full on ‘Crash Mode’.

‘Crash Mode’ will happen when everyone figures out that the FED is no longer going to rush in and save the market.  I do not think that the FED will take back its rate hike, but there will some form of snap back rally.  Look at a chart of August 2015.  Following China’s first 4% currency devaluation, we plunged 1,000 points in 5 days, but then had a 2-day, 990-point bounce.  I’m looking for something similar.  My only question is sustainability.

I think that it is written in stone that we're going to test 1867 on the S&P.  We might bounce and wiggle first, but eventually that level gets tested.  If it holds, we'll trade sideways and slightly higher for a while.  If it doesn't, then a full on ‘Crash Mode’ is upon us, and we may not stop until a full 25% correction has been put in place.

The market tried to bounce on Tuesday, but managed only a slightly green day.  It tried again on Friday morning, quickly gaining 150 points before rolling over once again.  One of these bounces will stick.  If nothing goofy happens over the weekend, Monday may be the day – or it may show up as a ‘V’ style rescue.  The bottom line is that unless you are a skilled day-trader, you do NOT want to be holding anything long or short in this mess.  If you're a position trader, I think it would be a big mistake to ‘buy this dip’ in hopes of some ‘run to glory’.

The world is in turmoil.  Gold is a great place to be.  But if you can't stomach the gyrations of gold, then go to cash.  Earnings season starts this week, and that will add even more volatility to the mix.  If you're going to trade, do it in big liquid instruments like the SPY.  Right now, ‘Return OF’ your money is much more important than a ‘Return ON’ your money.


Support & Resistance
INDU 16,346 - I’m expecting consolidation around the 16,400 level, and if we continue through that – then I think the low is 16,000.
NDX 4270      I’m looking for some sloppy consolidation around 4200 – 4400. Apple has been an unexpected drag, but speculative buyers came in on Friday.  This could give the index support that could rollover into the Dow Jones.
SPX 1922      The range here is between 1920 and 1980.  This week could bring ‘knee-jerk’ sell-offs and rallies.  The next level of support is 1901.  I’m hearing people talk about 1750 and 1800, but I don’t think we get there.  I think we will see consolidation in this area – unless some other shoe drops.
RUT 1046      My one concern about the general market order flow is seeing the Russell index smash through its 1080 level.  We really need to see this index get back above 1080 and close there with some strength.  If we can get up into the 1080 area with some volume – it could confirm some support or at least bring consolidation in here.

I’m looking at:
-       TSLA (211) – now that it has broken through 213, I’m looking for more downside,
-       DECK (44) – below 45, it appears to be heading lower,
-       CRM (73) – is sitting on it’s 200-day moving average – if it holds – selling a Put Credit Spread would be the way to go,
-       DIS (99) – around $98 Disney gets interesting again to the upside,
-       AAPL (97) – look for the bounce to continue – before shorting this again,
-       FB (97) – look for a bounce into 99, before shorting it again,
-       AMZN (608) – looking for more downside into 601, and
-       **UA (75) - looking at selling the $87 Jan5 Calls / and buying the $90 Feb Calls for a credit of 2 cents – so virtually no downside risk in this trade!

I am:
-       Long various mining stocks: AG, AUY, EGO, GFI, IAG, and FFMGF,
-       Long an oil supplier: REN @ $0.56,
-       Sold RH – Jan – Call Credit Spread – 80 / 85, and
-       Sold SPX – Mar – Call Credit Spread – 2150 / 2155.

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.


Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson


No comments:

Post a Comment