This Week in Barrons – 11-16-2014:
Dear Ms. Yellen:
Are we having an ‘all out’ currency war? The reason I ask is that I’ve seen this behavior before – where assets, commodities and debt all begin to lose their relationship with each other – and out pops the American Revolution, our Civil War, World War I, and World War II. With China’s announcement of ‘almost’ QE on Friday, I think that we are in a full-out currency war with the rest of the world.
Just when I thought the BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India & China) would be rational and watch the rest of us (Japan, U.S. and Europe) fight it out – they have now decided to act. I was shocked when China (the world’s fastest growing and second-largest economy) announced an interest rate cut of 40 basis points from 6% to 5.6%. They also freed up deposit rates – allowing savers to participate in a higher return. And, right on the heels of China’s announcement, Europe’s Draghi ran to the nearest microphone to say that the ECB will go ‘ALL IN‘ – doing everything in its power to do more QE. And this even triggered India to think about doing ‘more stimulus’.
My take away from all of this is:
- The global economy is slowing – faster than I expected,
- The world is hurtling towards a depression – faster than I expected,
- And every central bank is going to try and destroy their currency in a bid to pay their debts with cheaper money – faster than I expected.
I realize that the stock markets will rally on the idea of more printed money, but we all know how this ends. First it was Japan, then the U.S., then Japan again, now China, and soon Draghi will try his best to circumvent the entire Euro zone Charter and find a way to print more money.
Ms. Yellen, doesn’t this put you into a tricky situation? The general expectation is that the Fed will raise rates at the beginning of next year. However, with your measuring stick of inflation (CPI) recently ticking lower to 1.7% - doesn’t this raise a ‘deflationary’ concern? And now with China, Japan and Europe all ‘putting the squeeze on’ – couldn’t we easily see the CPI contract to 1.5% as the dollar index spikes to 90 or higher? And won’t this ‘spike higher’ (a) widen the trade gap, (b) negatively impact every multi-national company’s top-line revenues, and (c) cause manufacturing jobs in the U.S. to shrink and (once again) move abroad.
Ms. Yellen, my questions are:
- How long can you take the pain of a strong dollar, and the risk of deflation?
- And with Japan’s announcement (last week) of them dipping into a recession – isn’t that a vote against QE? (As an aside: One of Japan’s latest ideas is to hand out gift cards to ‘poor people’ and let them go and ‘buy anything they want’. I can’t make this stuff up!)
Ms. Yellen, can you tell me again how all of this ends well?
In a world where the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India & China) are joining together to form their own financial bank and trading agreements, and as nations have attempted to move away from the U.S. dollar – a pattern of behavior seems to have emerged:
- Remember Libya's Ghaddafi? He declared that he wanted to begin to refuse the dollar. He called on all Arab and African nations to establish a new African continent using a new currency – the gold dinar. What was the outcome for Mr. Ghaddafi? He was overthrown by the U.S. government and NATO, and later killed.
- Remember Iraq’s Saddam? He declared that he wanted to sell his oil for Euro’s instead of U.S. dollars. What was the outcome for Saddam? The U.S. invaded Iraq due to terrorism and suspicion of harboring weapons of mass destruction – he was later killed.
- Remember Christophe de Margerie – the CEO of ‘Total’ the huge French oil conglomerate. This is what he said this summer concerning the purchase of oil in U.S. dollars: “It would be good if the euro was used more. The fact that oil prices are quoted in dollars per barrel does not mean that payments actually have to be made in that currency. There are no valid reasons to pay for hydrocarbons in the American national currency." He also spoke out against the Russian sanctions imposed by the U.S. What was his outcome? He was killed in a ‘freak’ plane crash.
So, you either jump on board with the U.S. dollar – or you end up ‘dead’ is the way that I see it.
In terms of the market, the bottom line is that this market is grossly overbought. Central Banks are hoping that by pushing the market to insane heights it will cure the economy's ills. It won't, but it seems like the last option at this point. The only thing holding this market up is the banksters and their behind-the-scenes maneuvers. I can see them pushing the market higher, trying to keep everyone feeling good for the Holiday shopping season – but that’s a nervous ‘hold’ for me.
If you've been in this game as long as I have, you've seen:
- The ‘Tech’ Bubble of the late 90's – and the resulting crash,
- The ‘Housing’ Bubble – and the resulting crash,
- The ‘Credit’ Bubble – and the resulting crash / financial meltdown,
- And now we're in the ‘Central Bank’ bubble – it too will crash.
There is a good reason why so many of the most respected fund managers are woefully behind the market this year. This year most of them remained on the ‘side lines’, or put very little of their cash to work. They are seeing the same things that I do and that is: no volume, Central Bank rigging, and earnings created with buy-backs. This is NOT a signal of a healthy market.
This week we saw the Chinese cut rates, Draghi go "ALL IN" on QE, and Obama shortcut the Constitution and print trillions more dollars in order to accommodate 5 million more ‘new citizens’. All that was enough to send the market soaring on Friday.
History shows that we normally levitate up through the Thanksgiving Holiday, and I could easily see them doing that again. But, it’s going to be more of a struggle this time. When you have China cutting rates, Draghi starting QE, and we can't even hold a 100-point day – you know that things are desperate. This market is tired and heavy. I’m going to approach this week as I did last – leaning long but with my finger near the sell button.
I wish everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. It’s my favorite holiday, and I truly enjoy spending time with friends and family.
I am not bearish here, but I continue to feel that more consolidation is in order. I talk to other traders, and we scratch our heads looking at the last 5 weeks. I know it seems like ancient history, but if you recall – remember all the gloom and doom 5 weeks ago when the S&P was at 1817? We are currently at 2071, which is 254 points ‘straight up’ in 5 weeks. If you have traded for very long, you have seen this game before and you know how it ends. I certainly don’t want to fight this move as we will likely have even more upside, but everyone being so bullish and ‘risk-on’ makes me nervous.
My current list of potential candidates has grown from last week and is as follows; DDD, APA, MCD, DFS, DKS, JEC, GILD, PEP, PII, WGO, ALL, MET, PRU, KSU, ABT, AAPL, WYNN, FDX, HSY, FLR, BMY, DPS, TEX, TRV, UTX, and KR.
I’m looking at the following Iron Condors (all with a Risk/Reward of less than 4:1):
- GILD – Dec1 – 92/93 to 108/109 for $0.19,
- IBB – Dec1 – 275/277.5 to 310/312.5 for $1.18,
- IBB – Jan 2015 – 260/265 to 325/330 for $1.15,
- RUT – Jan 2015 – 1060/1070 to 1260/1270 for $$1.88,
- WYNN – Dec1 – 169/170 to 190/191.5 for $0.30, and
- WYNN – Dec 2014 – 164/165 to 194/195 for $0.20
To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <> .
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <email@example.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <>.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:
To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://>
Until next week – be safe.