This
Week in Barrons – 10-27-2013
Now You See Me … Now You Don’t!
I remember the summer movie: “Now
You See Me” all too well. However, most
people miss the daily magic that is being performed by our equity markets and by
our economic reporting systems. In fact on Tuesday, we watched a
transformation of the jobs report – that was as astounding as any girl turning
into a tiger.
One of the biggest headaches for
Obama (and for Obamacare) is that companies have decided that if they're going
to go bankrupt giving mandated health care to full-time employees, they will
simply only hire part-timers, and also reduce their regular staff from 40 to 29
hours.
According to Obama and Mark Zandi (the
CNBC jobs report ‘talking head’), if corporations were shifting to part-time
workers – it would show up in the data. Over
and over we have heard from Mr. Zandi that the data doesn’t reflect this shift
– despite corporate headline after headline talking about either cutting
healthcare or cutting their people to part time. However, on Tuesday the CNBC producers made a
mistake and had on (as a guest) Bob Funk from Express Employment Professionals.
Mr. Funk was also the past head of the
Kanas City Fed. Honestly, he simply
ripped Mark Zandi apart. But, he did it
in such a calm, soothing manner that Mr. Zandi didn't even realize he had just
been ‘given the business’. Bob Funk
said: "I don't know where the Bureau of Labor & Statistics (BLS) is getting their
numbers, or why the part timers aren't showing up in their data – because here (in
the real world) we're seeing part-time employment up 123%. Years ago, companies (hiring through us)
hired 60% for full-time and 40% for part-time workers. Today, it's exactly reversed. 40% are looking for full-time employees, and 60%
are looking for part-time. Obamacare is
indeed affecting business and jobs."
It was fun to watch Mr. Funk gently (and
with class) correct Mr. Zandi. However,
the real ‘magic’ didn't come from Zandi being schooled on TV, that was simply a
preliminary act. The Grand Illusion came
from the unveiling of the BLS’s Jobs Report.
Although the ‘Monthly Non-Farm Payroll Report’ came out ‘inline with
estimates’ with a gain of 148,000 jobs, it was the ‘Household Survey’ that
produced the most outrageous illusion. According
to BLS’s September Household Survey, a record 595,000 people were rotated OUT
of part-time and into full-time work, PLUS an additional 133,000 full-time jobs
were created.
This makes virtually no sense. Last month corporate CEOs were worried about:
-
The Fed
beginning to taper,
-
The Debt
Ceiling approaching and whether we would go over the cliff, and
-
The
Government shut down.
And now you’re asking me to believe
that those same CEO’s – were so ‘full of love’, that they let almost 600,000 employees
go from a less than 29 hour work-week to a 40 hour and above work-week. And, they did that in the month directly preceding
the launch of the Obamacare web site. Pull
my finger. In times like these I always
remember the quote from Joseph Stalin: “It isn't important who votes. What is important is who counts the votes.”
Honestly, Obamacare promotes part-time
low paying jobs. The BLS can hide some
of the data, but real people like Mr. Bob Funk know the actual results. Full-time work (with benefits) is becoming
harder and harder to find. Currently only
10% of our post-graduate degree candidates are finding full-time
employment. But part-time service jobs
are indeed plentiful. Obama told us that
he wanted to "Fundamentally change America", and he's certainly doing
that!
The Market...
Dare I say the word…bubble? This market is beginning
to look like a true 1999 bubble, and we all know that bubbles – POP.
Every day I am forced to listen to ‘talking heads’ on financial
TV tell me why this time it’s different; and why the market isn't being driven
solely by Benji bucks. They talk about our
underlying economic strength. To which,
I simply point to the sell off that occurred when there was simply a ‘hint’ of
QE taper – and that’s where the conversation normally ends.
Imagine being an investment analyst at a major company. It's
your job to dig into company internals, management, cost controls, expenses,
sales, procurement, supply chains, supplier pricing, and more. It may
take you months to put together a thorough review of the company – before presenting
your findings to the J. Q. Public. The bottom line is: in this
environment, the analyst can’t say: “The company is garbage, but it is going to
go up because the Fed's printing money like crazy." The analyst
would be terminated on the spot. So
analysts across the board are being forced to find reasons why companies (that
should otherwise be going down in value) – are instead – going up (in value).
Okay, so the market continues to move higher on extremely low
volume. How long can this go on? It can go as far as the Fed’s $85 billion a
month of buying will take it. I know
that's an odd way of saying things, but it is true. There's a certain amount of economic activity
and market levity that $85 billion a month will buy. When we get to that point, the market will
stagnate until they produce more QE money. I don't know where that
level is, but considering the current volume of buying and selling – there are
very few players remaining with the cash to make things happen.
The SPY is the Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) that reflects the
performance of the S&P Index. For
2012, the SPY traded an average of 22 million shares an hour, or approximately 143
million shares a day. Last Thursday (for example) we traded 73
million shares – half the average volume of last year. So as you can see, there is NOT the same level
of market participation out there this year – as there was last year.
I have heard the rumor that The Ben Bernanke could announce a
surprise taper this week, and I’ve dismissed it out of hand. Heading into a sub par quarter, with the
Holidays fast approaching – it would be suicide for the Fed to pull a fast one.
It's my guess (that except for a couple
2-3% pull backs now and again) we're just going to keep slowly levitating into
the yearend.
It doesn’t make sense, and no, it won’t end well. But ‘the powers that be’ created this monster and
it has to play out. We continue to lean long. Yes, we continue to be concerned. We have not had a ‘normal’ 10% correction for
over 520 days. But, there’s no reason we
can’t make it to 600 days. After all,
it’s just Benji Bucks anyway.
In the very short term, the SPY has a bit of a challenge
directly ahead of it. It tried to get
over 1760 Friday, but came up slightly short. If the market can't get over 1760 on Monday, we
could see a small fade to start the week.
Tips:
This week I tweeted about a couple
stocks that I liked – they included: SNDK over 70, PNRA over 155, and ANR over
7 – but realize that ANR reports earnings on Oct 31. We sold CERN, CIEN, HES, LRCX, and WRN – all for
nice profits.
My
current short-term holds are:
-
JOY
– in at 55.03 (currently 58.09) – stop at entry,
-
SBUX
– in at 77.50 (currently 79.96) – stop at 78,
-
SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 13.67) – no stop
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently
130.54) – no stop ($1,352.40 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 22.60)
– no stop ($21.87 per physical ounce).
To
follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is:
taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F.
Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any
reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in
complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
No comments:
Post a Comment