This Week in Barrons –
5-12-2013
A Game Changing Experience:
First and most important – Happy
Mother’s Day. The job of being a mother
is the most important, and often the most underappreciated – and certainly
deserves its day of recognition!
Personally, the “Internet” has been
one of the single, biggest, “game changing” events that I have ever
witnessed. Then came the smart device –
for not only it’s informational abilities but also it’s GPS / locational
accuracy. But not long ago, a technology
morphed into something (that while not completely a stand-alone concept) is a
game changer. That technology is 3-D
printing. Basically what happens is that
you pour a powder into a machine, and then feed the machine's computer a 3-Dimensional
drawing. The computer then goes to work
"laying" that powder down in the same exact places that the drawing
says it should go. When a layer of the material
is laid down, a laser or a heat source hits the material and solidifies it. Then the machine makes the next pass over the
item, depositing more plastic or powder where it's supposed to go. Add another shot from the laser for
solidification, and so on. Layer by
layer a real 3-Dimensional, tangible item is produced.
In the beginning of its very short
history, 3-D printers were able to make simple things like toys, army men, and
game pieces. Then came the first
"wrench", and then onto the first moving parts like gears, cogs, cranks
and fan blades. Next medicine got
involved by creating model limbs, bones and jaws. In very rapid fashion the amount of things
that people were making were pretty amazing. But there was (and to some extent still is) a
problem. Most of the media used in the
process is some form of plastic. So even
a wrench made from your local 3-D printer, although it looks perfect, just can't
take the stresses of being used like a “Craftsman” wrench from Sears. The material just isn’t strong enough.
Now, let’s suppose there is a
material that will allow a dot matrix layering – that when heated (or lasered)
becomes as strong as steel. What if an
element like Graphene (or some alloy of it) makes things that are actually stronger
than steel? Suddenly the entire
manufacturing process for small items is completely disrupted. You would never need to go to a Home Depot
for a screw or a screwdriver again. Did
you break the wheel on your desk chair? Print
one. Do you need a new case for your iPhone?
Print one.
Well, the news was buzzing this week
about the 3-D gun that was successfully printed and fired. A handful of people were working on creating a
gun out of a printer that could hold up to the pressures created inside a gun when
the chamber is fired. Previously, the
plastic would fail due to those excessive pressures. Well, this week it
worked. A working, functional firearm was
created from nothing but plastic powder and a $2,000 printer. And then
the plans were put ‘on-line’ for the world to see and use. The plans were in a CAD (Computer-Aided
Design) format; therefore, anyone could take the plans, feed them into a 3-D
printer, and produce a functioning firearm. Now that’s a game changer in many ways.
Mayor Bloomberg (of New York City)
is currently pushing legislation through that would make it a crime to own a 3-D
printed gun. This week the State
department demanded that the plans be taken down (off the Internet). Factually – the plans have been downloaded
over 100,000 times and reside on servers all around the world, so the
technology and solution are out there. But
that isn't the real point. The point is
that as materials get stronger, anyone with a CAD program and a printer can (and
will) produce everything – even elements as sophisticated as a firearm.
3-D printing could truly be one of
the most disruptive technologies of our time.
Not only does it eliminate entire classes of machinists that turn metal
on lathes; it changes the entire landscape of small parts manufacturing. It (obviously) opens up a black market in the
weapons industry. While it might not be
feasible or economical to make many of the elements with these printers (even
if we had the ingredients that would work) – but there’s little doubt that 3-D
printing is a game changer! Linking this
to investments, look at companies that exist in the space like: DDD, XONE, and PRLB.
The Market:
Friday was a funny day. All day the averages seemed tired, and sorely
in need of a rest. But as usual, in the
last 40 minutes the buying started and pushed the averages up to end another
record week. I remember when setting a
record was exciting. Now that we set one
daily – it’s becoming mundane.
So the music is still playing and there
are still musical chairs available on the deck of the Titanic. How long this can last is anyone's
guess. But it seems to me that when they do decide to yank the rug on the
government funding, it's going to be faster and sharper than most will imagine.
I sold some half positions on
Friday. We had really nice short-term
gains on several names and I wanted to lock in some of that profit. By selling half positions, I get to lock in a
good gain, but still keep some “skin in the game”. While I'm not against
picking up more stocks if they look ready to make a move, let's all remember
we're in a bubble, and bubbles are irrational.
In the meantime, gold was beaten
down again – but the attempt wasn’t nearly as successful as it was a few weeks
back. While it was down $50/ounce at
mid-day, it rallied back to close down just $24/ounce. I see signs that ‘potentially’ they're going
to let gold and silver run a bit here. If
that's correct, we'll want to jump on some gold and silver stock plays.
ABX over $22 sounds reasonable as a decent short-term trade.
I received some emails asking about
"penny" stocks. I don't really
play penny stocks – simply due to the risk involved. While I may dream of buying a stock at 70
cents and having it go to $20, the number of them that actually do – is pretty
small. More times than not, the penny
stocks are the domain of the day-traders – the gents that buy 20K shares at 10
am and sell them at 10:50 for a two cent gain. Normally my investing line
is $5, but (I must admit) when I first bought SLW it was $3 and ended at $46 –
so there are exceptions to every rule.
If you’re into penny stocks, look at
MJNA. It’s a ‘medical marijuana’ stock
that ran from 4 cents to 35 cents recently.
I honestly find picking penny stocks a ‘stretch’ for my skill set. For example: There is a tiny company with the
ticker symbol APDN, trading around 20 cents.
They have a very interesting security application that marks elements
for identification using your DNA. Your
DNA is unique, and therefore if your Rolex watch gets stolen – your DNA could
identify it as being yours. In Europe,
where all the exit doors of jewelry exchanges have "DNA Sprays" above
them, it works very nicely. And, in the
stores that use it, crime has become "non existent". But
guessing whether a company like that could make the same impact over in the US
– that’s beyond my comfort level.
A shout out to DS a reader that
introduced us to the following chart for Median Household Income – showing a
steady decline from 2000 thru 2013:
We learned last week
that the average workweek declined in the number of hours worked, and it was
the largest decline since April 2009.
Often companies reduce hours at the early stages of economic
contractions, prior to laying-off workers.
Not to mention that the quality of the jobs created by this economy
continues to be horrible. At the current
rate, the majority of Americans are going to be tending bar, waiting tables or
holding multiple temp jobs to make ends meet.
Salaried positions with benefits are becoming a dying breed. Even the banks, which are the recipients of
the Fed's generosity, are laying-off workers – such as JP Morgan just shedding
17,000 positions.
Unfortunately, wealth
disparity (which has grown demonstrably over the past decade) is distorting the
personal income figures that are often used to measure the health of the US
economy. As shown above, the median
family income has declined over the past 10 years. Median household income declined 1.1% in
the month of February, and it is down 5.6% since the recovery began in June
2009. So the devil is (once again) in
the details.
Tips:
We made some trades
this week and our short-term account is listed below.
My current short-term holds are currently:
-
ANF –
in at 52.59 (currently 53.84) – stop at 53.10
-
CAT –
in at 87.12 (currently 88.62) – stop at 88.25
-
SBUX –
in at 60.70 (currently 63.09) – stop at 62.00
-
TJX –
in at 48.77 (currently 50.95) – stop at 49.25
-
NSC –
in at 77.03 (currently 79.01) – stop at 77.90
-
SLB –
in at 75.18 (currently 76.29) – stop at 75.20
-
SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 14.30) – no stop yet
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 139.96) – no stop
($1,436.80 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 22.98) – no stop
($23.63 per physical ounce).
To follow me on
Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out
there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts
proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic
newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF
Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please write to <rfc@getabby.com>
to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
<rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If you'd like to view
RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to
sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm"
is my handle.
If you'd like to see
RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the
TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To unsubscribe please
refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way
as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a
testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or
associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by
a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS
REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions
of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT
INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS
INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY
CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE
INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment
performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount
of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account
managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of
a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of
diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary
market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is
expected to develop.
All material presented
herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson
and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<mailto:rfc@getabby.com>
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
No comments:
Post a Comment