This Week in Barrons – 9-1-2012
7 Trillion Dollars – Yum – Yum…
Last week I made waves when I suggested that the recent Sentinel court ruling is the door opener for financial institutions to co-mingle customer funds with their proprietary trading desks – play cowboy with your money – and if they lose it – “Too Bad” – they are not on the hook. All they have to say is that they used your money to make you even more money, it went bad, and it was lost. No fraud, no foul, no illegality. Last week people asked me:
Last week I made waves when I suggested that the recent Sentinel court ruling is the door opener for financial institutions to co-mingle customer funds with their proprietary trading desks – play cowboy with your money – and if they lose it – “Too Bad” – they are not on the hook. All they have to say is that they used your money to make you even more money, it went bad, and it was lost. No fraud, no foul, no illegality. Last week people asked me:
1. – If I was serious?
2. – If I believed it?
3. – And why would the
court open the floodgates for institutions to co-mingle funds?
My answers are:
1. - Yes, I’m serious.
2. - Yes, I do believe
it.
3. - It’s all about the
money. With over $7 Trillion (about 50%
of our total deficit) sitting in pension funds and 401K's – if they can get
their hands on it, they will.
Right
now Obama is locked in a fight for his job, and he's beginning to sweat. Anyone that's not on the Governments payroll
is tired of the rhetoric, and is not better off than 4 years ago. The Anti-Obama movie "2016" has been
selling out across the country.
Currently most people figure that "it must be really rich people that
lost their money, so it's not my problem". Well my prediction is that at some point we’re
going to hear about "everyday folks" losing their retirement to
co-mingled funds. Then Uncle Sam is
going to say: “It’s time to stop playing in the Wall Street Casino and come
over to the USA Retirement Program. All employer/employee
retirement money will now become part of our program."
This concept was initiated between 2007 and 2010. The Government was broke, the banksters had taken down the financial system, and they were looking everywhere for money. Everyday the Unions would come to Obama and tell them that their pensions were underfunded. The market crash had taken a lot of people from ‘Hero to Zero’ in a very short time. So the calls went out to find cash. What they found was $6 Trillion in 401K's and Roth IRA's – mostly sitting there almost forgotten. And it was Vice President Joe Biden that floated the idea of a "Guaranteed Retirement Account" (GRA), in the February 2010 "Middle Class Report". The report outlines how the government was going to force our retirement funds into a Government-Run Mandatory Plan.
Even before that, Teresa Ghilarducci (an economist) wrote a paper in
2007 called “Agenda for Shared Prosperity”, that she presented to the Economic
Policy Institute in Washington. In that
paper she outlined her ideal plan for these "Guaranteed Retirement
Accounts". She proposed that our current system is failing, too few
people are in 401K’s and taxes are straining the elderly. Therefore, a "Guaranteed Retirement Account"
(run by Uncle Sam) that forces you to donate to the program is a way of solving
things. To quote: "Contributions
equal to 5% of earnings are deducted along with payroll taxes and credited to
individual accounts administered by the Social Security Administration. The
cost of contributions is split equally between employer and employee. Mandatory
contributions are deducted on earnings up to the Social Security
earnings cap".
The problem with the Biden proposal (as you might expect) was that the Republicans fought back – telling the government to “keep your hands off our people's retirement money". Well, when the front door is locked – find the back door. I believe that this is why the Sentinel Court case was not some ‘off the wall’, one time mistake. Ever since February of 2010 (when the idea of a Government sponsored retirement account first surfaced), our government has been fixated on getting that pool of money.
So if the Republicans won't let them just take it without a fight, and the population doesn't really trust Uncle Sam (but doesn't trust Wall Street either), you can see what they've decided to do. Let Wall Street rape J.Q. Public enough that J.Q. Public will come to Uncle Sam begging for safety.
The problem with the Biden proposal (as you might expect) was that the Republicans fought back – telling the government to “keep your hands off our people's retirement money". Well, when the front door is locked – find the back door. I believe that this is why the Sentinel Court case was not some ‘off the wall’, one time mistake. Ever since February of 2010 (when the idea of a Government sponsored retirement account first surfaced), our government has been fixated on getting that pool of money.
So if the Republicans won't let them just take it without a fight, and the population doesn't really trust Uncle Sam (but doesn't trust Wall Street either), you can see what they've decided to do. Let Wall Street rape J.Q. Public enough that J.Q. Public will come to Uncle Sam begging for safety.
- This is why the
court found nothing wrong with Sentinel.
- This is why John Corzine
was allowed to take a billion customer dollars and roll the dice.
- This is why Bernie
Madoff’s billions are still unfound.
They've allowed the market go crazy, so they can come out and declare
that the average person should not have their money in a 401K (where bad things
can happen to it), but rather let Uncle Sam take care of it for you. Once we get this next round
of QE/Stimulus, and we see the coordinated global push and take advantage of it
– my remaining 401K’s and IRA’s will be liquidated and converted to physical
assets. As far the trading accounts go –
there’s always been a risk to them. They
aren't FDIC protected, and all we’re hoping there is to be one step ahead.
I
know that what I just wrote is scary, and could be written off as the musings
of a madman, but before you go there – remember this same government just
FORCED you to buy health insurance or be taxed by the 16,000 new IRS agents that
were recently hired.
The Market...
Once again some jawboning from The Ben Bernanke saved the market from really melting down this week. He stated (from Jackson Hole, Wyoming) that indeed he is poised to "do more" if the economy doesn't show any signs of perking up. I feel that the ‘more’ is coming on September 13th. The FOMC has a two-day meeting on the 12th and the 13th, and that allows them to see a handful of important things. First, we will have seen the most recent non-farm payroll report. Secondly, we will then know about the ECB bank meeting. And third, the German vote on the constitutionality of going along with the ESM program will be announced on the 12th.
There are many ways that this can play out:
Once again some jawboning from The Ben Bernanke saved the market from really melting down this week. He stated (from Jackson Hole, Wyoming) that indeed he is poised to "do more" if the economy doesn't show any signs of perking up. I feel that the ‘more’ is coming on September 13th. The FOMC has a two-day meeting on the 12th and the 13th, and that allows them to see a handful of important things. First, we will have seen the most recent non-farm payroll report. Secondly, we will then know about the ECB bank meeting. And third, the German vote on the constitutionality of going along with the ESM program will be announced on the 12th.
There are many ways that this can play out:
- If the Germans agree
to the ESM plan, AND The Ben Bernanke announces something big on the 13th
with QE3, we're going to get a big time rally that could easily test the all
time highs by year-end.
- If the Germans hold
tight and vote against the ESM, but The Ben Bernanke still lets loose with QE3,
we will still rally – we just won’t get as far.
- BUT, if we don't get
anything out of either – we’re going to see a drop of 20% or more in a big
hurry.
Honestly, it’s not really all that often when we know (in advance) that
a big move is on the table. We all
should take advantage of this by playing both sides of the coin. The market IS going to move up or down
significantly. I'm leaning towards up,
but I'm not willing to take a one side trade on that, no thanks. Let’s discuss next time the ‘straddles’ and
‘strangles’ required to best position our portfolios ahead of the move.
Tips:
We
made some nice gains and cashed out this week on: SPY, SNDK, and TTWO. I’m currently watching VRSN
over 48, NTAP over 35.12, CLF on a double bottom bounce over 37.50, and AUY
over 17 – all seem interesting to me.
Currently I’m holding:
-
GDX – in at 42.50 (currently 47.96) – stop at
47.00
-
LOW in at 28.02 (currently 28.48) – stop at
entry
-
SBUX in at 48.88 (currently 49.61) – stop at
49.10
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently
164.22) – no stop ($1,684.60 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 30.84)
– no stop ($31.37 per physical ounce).
To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades
– my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the
BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of
noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources
and those he interviews. You can learn
more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please write to <rfc@getabby.com>
to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
.
If you'd like to view RF's actual stock
trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter
follower - "taylorpamm" is my
handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action -
teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he
gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To unsubscribe please refer to the
bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for
information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer,
an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of,
or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not
registered and licensed brokers. This
message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is
intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute
an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice
can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering
document. Past performance is not
indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important
disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an
offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson
and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF
FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN
INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING
HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT
SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF
INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS
MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance can
be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her
investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total
trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor
applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification
and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an
investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to
develop.
All material presented herein is
believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions
expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or
the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
No comments:
Post a Comment