RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, May 3, 2015

This Week in Barrons - 5-3-2015

This Week in Barrons – 5-3-2015:
                                                













Thoughts:

Dear Ms. Yellen:

This week we learned that our economy grew (via the first quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP)) at a whopping +0.2%.  So, after trillions of dollars in QE and constant market manipulations, the economy missed going negative by two tenths of one percent.  And without the large inventory buildup addition to GDP, our first quarter growth would have been negative -2.4%.  Obviously, if this market goes to new highs, it won't be on the back of a growing economy.  

Ms. Yellen, with a shrinking economy as a backdrop, I couldn’t (for the longest time) figure out why you would ever raise interest rates?  And then it came to me; the ‘black swan’ event that you fear is the inclusion of the Chinese Yuan into the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) calculation.  Allow me to explain my thinking.  SDRs are an alternative reserve currency that can be used to backstop reserves and even pay back obligations to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and member nations.  SDRs can't be used to buy or sell products – just currency. Soon, they will be changing.

Currently only 4 currencies make up the SDR: the Japanese Yen, the European Euro, the British Pound Sterling, and the U.S. Dollar.  Conspicuous by its absence is the Chinese Yuan, and all signs point to China being included in the SDR in October.  That will not only increase China's voice in the IMF, but it will allow their currency to be freely traded across the globe.

Countries wishing to diversity their currency reserves have only the 4 choices listed above with the U.S. dollar being the best looking horse in the glue factory.  In other words, the minute the Chinese are accepted into the SDR basket, it paves the way for all nations to diversify some holdings away from Yen, Dollar, Euro and Pound and into the Yuan.  That means that U.S. Dollars would be sold in order that nations could buy Yuans – i.e. the demand for the U.S. dollar will fall.  And that Ms. Yellen, is the ‘black swan’ event that I think you’re worried about.  You know that when the Chinese Yuan is added to the SDR, they are going to become a reserve currency, and some amount of dollars will be sold to accumulate them.  The demand for U.S. dollars is one of the main reasons that we have been allowed to live far above our actual economic situation, and removal of that demand will manifest itself in many ways starting with inflation. 

When China is admitted to the SDR, then the dollar will fall (maybe a lot).  If demand for U.S. dollars falls, our Treasury will need to fund their notes by either: increasing taxes (2016 is an election year), printing more money (we just ended QE), or increasing interest rates.

Ms. Yellen, that is why, (despite lousy economic news, horrible economic reports and truly ugly data) you’re blaming the weather and the fall in oil prices for our declining economy – is it not?  That also explains why you keep doctoring up the economic reports, and why you tapered the QE program.  You are desperate to raise rates to offset what you see coming with a declining dollar.  You also know that the Chinese admittance will cause large dollar dislocations, and that could set the price of gold free.

What I’m struggling with is that during my lifetime, I will have witnessed our politicians and our Fed take the single best economy on earth and completely transform it into the #1 indebted nation on earth in just a few decades.  No one could possibly make that many consecutive mistakes.  This had to be done on purpose.  I’m struggling with that purpose.


The Market:

The market continues to move sideways with ‘dips’ getting bought and ‘rips’ getting sold.  This market is going to resolve itself at some point.  A couple closes over 2117 on the S&P and we’ll move higher, where a couple closes under the 50-day moving average at 2090 and we will be heading lower.  In between those two, we have a crapshoot. 

Factually:
-       According to Goldman, corporate stock buy-back orders are up 23% year over year, and last year was an all-time record year,
-       Construction spending hit a two year low, and
-       Shortly, corporate stock buy-backs will come to the market’s rescue (as they have had to wait until after earnings).

I’m only looking for a market correction if:
-       The Dollar (DXY) continues to weaken, and breaks below 95,
-       The 10-year note continues to march higher above 2.2%, 
-       Oil continues its march higher, and exceeds $60 a barrel,
-       More cities (like Chicago) show financial distress, and get their debt downgraded, and
-       The Volatility Index (VIX) gets below 12 – showing complacency.  As a general rule, I like to see the VIX around 16.  The VIX below 14 shows an unconcerned market, and is where I often begin to buy hedges / insurance.  The VIX below 12 shows a market ‘ignoring all risk’, and is where I begin to over-insure.  The VIX in single digits signifies that a big move is coming – either up or down.

Currently, we are watching a tug-of-war being waged between the fundamentals and manipulation.  The fundamentals tell us that ‘this market must submit and fall’ while the manipulators say ‘this market must continue higher, or all hell will break loose’.   In the long run, the fundamentals will win out, but the ‘long run’ can be a lot longer than you'd think.  We are currently 6 years into a bogus recovery, and no one expected it to last this long. 

Thus far, the March 2 and April 24 highs have been a concrete wall that the market can't break through.  But each time the market nears or violates its 50-day moving average to the downside, it gets a jolt of joy juice and up we soar again.  It’s been 2 months of this sideways chop for a market that is destined to either breakdown or breakout.

I continue to watch the levels.  Until we get over 2117 on the S&P or until we lose 2040 on the S&P, we are still in the channel and bouncing up and down like a yoyo.  If we were to put in 3 market closes over 2117, I'd feel confident we've got at least one last hurrah run in us before the wheels fall off.  If (however) we put in 3 or more closes under the 50-day at 2090, I'd be watchful for a quick fall to the lower boundaries at 2040, and if we lost that – the party's over. 

So until we get a breakout, or a breakdown, my game plan is the same.  I snag a few long side trades on the upswing, and take profits quickly.  Then I sidestep the drops as best I can, and wait to re-enter.  If we break through the highs and hold, I'll load up in anticipation of the one last push for glory.  If we lose the 2040 level, I’ll begin to take on long-term short positions. 


TIPS:

Currently looking at: 
-       WYNN – bad earnings – looks to be overdone – selling Put Credit Spread, 
-       KSU (Kansas City Southern) – to the upside – selling a Put Credit Spread, 
-       RH (Restoration Hardware) – to the upside,
-       AAPL (Apple) – to the upside,
-       SPX – Iron Condor – July 10th expiration, and
-       Calls on INTC > 33.20, MS > 37.70, AA > 14.20, DANG > 9.70, SCI > 28.40, USO > 20.60, FNV > 53.50 and PAAS > 10.

I’m currently holding:
-       CRM (Salesforce) – SOLD - Iron Condor – May @ 67.5 / 70 to 77.5 / 80,
-       CSX – BOUGHT - Calendar – May / Aug @ $38, 
-       DIS (Disney) – BOUGHT - May Calls @ $111,
-       GLD – BOUGHT MAY Call Debit Spread @ +112 / -120,
-       NKE (Nike) – BOUGHT - May Calls @ 98.50, 
-       NUGT – BOUGHT shares and weekly covered calls, 
-       DUST – BOUGHT shares and weekly covered calls,
-       ORCL – BOUGHT MAY / JUNE Call Calendar @ $45,
-       RUT – BOUGHT June Butterfly @ 1190 / 1260 / 1320, 
-       SPX – SOLD – Iron Condor – June @ 1970 / 1975 to 2175 / 2180, and
-       UNH – BOUGHT – Calendar – May/June @ $115

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0


To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
 
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> Until next week – be safe. R.F. Culbertson

<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>



Sunday, April 26, 2015

This Week in Barrons - 4-26-2015

This Week in Barrons – 4-26-2015:
                                                
            












Thoughts:

Dear Ms. Yellen:

Well it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if the debts CAN’T be paid, they WON’T be paid.  Our global economies are a kin to heroin junkies – requiring larger ‘fixes’ just to maintain their respective highs.  I am beginning to hear rumblings of a global, digital currency – a world without cash.  A world where everything you do will be credited or debited from your ‘card’.  This would allow everyone’s fiscal moves to be perfectly monitored – from buying a house and a car, to pharmaceuticals and food – the ultimate in control. 

To that end, the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s) SDR program is digital currency’s perfect implementation path.  The IMF has been gearing up for China's inclusion into the SDR basket since 1988, and should have it completed by October.  After that, we can legitimately discuss a new world currency system based upon the SDR model.  The SDR could be an equalizing force around the globe, as all local currencies will begin to be revalued in relation to the SDR.  After all, the U.S. has been the only reserve currency for 60 years; therefore, using the SDR as the new global standard is only fair.  But that will simply be the warm-up pitcher for our digital currency.

Accompanying anything digital is the tracking of the transaction, and those pesky transaction fees that bankers love.  Currently there are nations where the interest rate is negative.  That is to say, nations where banks charge you for storing your cash in their bank.  Now honestly, it costs you nothing to store your cash in your wallet or under your bed.  But if we were a cashless society, then we have no choice but to keep our money in the bank and ‘pay’ for the privilege.

But the transition to a cashless society will not be without its issues.  In November of last year, the G20 nations changed the language surrounding a bank deposit.  Now, when you make a deposit – the money is no longer yours, but belongs to the bank.  You are no longer putting your cash into a bank for safekeeping, but rather you are ‘loaning’ your money to that institution.  Therefore, if your bank begins to give car loans to people with no ability to pay them back and the bank goes under, your deposited money is way down the line in so far as you getting your money back.  The argument then shifts to the FDIC coming to the rescue.  Well that's fine when we're talking about a bank here or there, but the FDIC cannot possibly cover every account for $250,000.  A big bank failure would overwhelm the system in a day.  Last year the FDIC admitted that they really only have enough money to cover 2% of the nations deposits.

So my argument is this, many things are better than cash.  Historically, I can point to over 30 ‘fiat’ currencies that no longer exist.  Yet silver, gold, platinum, and diamonds have always held a value.  I think it makes a lot of sense to keep just enough money in the bank to cover your bills, with a bit of a cushion.  But I'd much rather store value in ‘things’ like: silver, gold, real estate, cars, etc.  Remember when you purchased that 1970 Barracuda 340 convertible for $2,800.  Today it would be worth about $45,000.

The bottom line is this: I don't trust banks, and the less money that I have in them – the better I feel.  I’m mindful of Henry Ford’s remark: “It is well enough that people do not understand our banking or monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”


The Market....

Factually:
-       Deutsche Bank was fined $2.5B for rigging the Libor rate,
-       China's factory activity declined at the fastest pace in a year,
-       This quarter MMM spent $1.5B buying-back their stock, but only took in $1.1B cash from operations.
-       Only 42% of companies reporting, have beaten their earnings estimates.
-       Durable Goods orders showed a -0.2% decline after removing transports.
-       The Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI) recorded its largest ‘miss’ to the downside ever recorded.
-       Investors (year to date) have pulled $79B out of equities, with net outflows in 9 of the past 10 weeks.

Question:      How does the market continue to rise (and even make new highs), while investors are actually pulling their money out?  
Answer:         The Corporation itself is the new buyer.  Corporations issue debt, and with that money buy-up their own stock.

We’re in a Disney(esque)land of endless global QE, and money printing.  We're in a time where Central banks buy stocks and futures.  We're in a time where ‘Job #1’ of our FED is to keep our stock market moving higher so that J. Q. Public doesn't understand that our country is ‘broke’.  People continue to harp on there being $700B of Corporate cash on the sidelines, but forget that it is accompanied by $1.5T in Corporate debt.  

On Friday the market was having a hard time making an all-time high in the S&P of over 2117.52.  With just an hour left in the trading day, we still needed several points.  But just moments before the day ended, the bell rang to magically close the S&P session at 2117.69 – a new all-time high by 17 cents.  If this market wants to go to S&P 2200 – I want to go along for the ride.  But it has to prove it to me by holding these new highs for a few days.  Right now, I'm not convinced.  The market struggled to squeak out that close on Friday, and it may not have the same conviction come Monday.

Also, seasonality comes into question.  Remember the adage: “Sell in May and go away".  Well, May is only 5 trading days away.  So even if this breakout holds, we are heading into a traditionally weak period that could produce a pullback.   Either way, we will know soon enough.  Just consider this statement by Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan: “Some things never change. There will be another crisis, and its impact will be decisively felt by the financial market."  Jamie, you’re absolutely right, and I’m betting that you probably know exactly what that upcoming crisis is going to be.


TIPS:

Currently looking at: 
-       AAPL – especially with earnings this week – look at the June 130 / 145 Call Debit Spread,
-       DIS – watching for a move to 111, so looking at the 107 June Calls, and
-       TWTR – looking at the May 52 / 60 Call Debit Spread

I’m currently holding:
-       GLD – BOUGHT MAY Call Debit Spread: +112 / -120,
-       NUGT – BOUGHT shares and weekly covered calls, 
-       DUST – BOUGHT shares and weekly covered calls, and
-       ORCL – BOUGHT MAY / JUNE Call Calendar: $45

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0


To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>



Sunday, April 19, 2015

This Week in Barrons - 4-19-2015

This Week in Barrons – 4-19-2015:
                                               













Thoughts:

Dear Ms. Yellen:

I’m sensing a global uneasiness.
-       Last week, Greece went to the IMF to ask for a delay in their payment schedule and was immediately denied.
-       Big banks like Goldman and Citi beat their earnings estimates, but on lowered revenues.
-       Fundamental economic reports such as: initial jobless claims, housing starts, and the Empire new orders index have been terrible.
-       Data out of China reflects a marked economic slowdown.
-       And Obama is pushing a new retirement program.

With all of this severe economic discontinuity, what do you do with your money?  Do you just leave it in the system and pray nothing happens, or do you take it out?  And if you take it out, what do you do with it?  Personally, I'm not a big fan of 401k's because of their outrageous management fees, and their stock portion is often NOT covered by any FDIC insurance.  I personally advise people to contribute enough money to get the employer match, and (since a ‘money market account’ is considered a deposit account) use the ‘money market’ option in the 401k instead of the ‘stock option’ for the time being.

In difficult times, I suggest that everyone attempt to pay off his or her own home mortgage.  For example: if you have 200k in your 401k, and the balance on your mortgage was 170k – I would pay off the mortgage and free myself from the bank.  First, most mortgages are ‘demand notes’, which the bank could call in at any time.  Second, most people’s ability to pay off their mortgage depends upon their having reliable employment, which often comes into question in tough times.  And thirdly, if things really get ugly, there is a real chance that our government could ‘temporarily’ confiscate our 401k’s.  There is virtually no chance that our government would confiscate our real estate as a result of any economic or financial collapse.  Putting this all together, I would rather pay off my mortgage when I could – rather than when I had to.

Ms. Yellen, our entire economic system is built on trust.  I trust that when I put $5,000 into the bank – that I can get $5,000 out of the bank.  I trust that when I send money to my 401K – that it is always going to be there.  In a perfect ‘Leave It to Beaver’ world, that would be true.  But what happens if we enter a greedy, evil world where fraud, theft and scams are prevalent?  I never want to get to a place where I truly believed such institutions as our bank deposits or stock holdings could be taken from us, but I think we're pretty close to that right now.  And, I think we all need to ponder the reality.


The Market:

Last week market regulators in China announced two things:  One, they are going to get tougher about people using the shadow banking system to finance stock purchases.  And two, the programs used to ‘short’ Chinese stocks were expanded to allow more stocks to be ‘short-able’. 

Last Thursday evening, China announced some of the worst economic numbers in about 6 years.  China is such an important importer and exporter, that if their economy is slowing – everyone will pay the price.  But potentially the worst news of all was that all of the Bloomberg terminals around the globe went ‘dark’ early Friday morning.  Allow me to explain.  If you are a money institution, you probably use the ‘Bloomberg’ trading platform – which connects you to the world via news, messages, and trades.  The platform costs approximately $20k per platform per year, and there are thousands of them in use around the world.  All of those platforms ‘went down’ early Friday morning and caused immediate worry by all of the institutional traders.

So between the lousy numbers out of China and the Bloomberg glitch, the market was in sad shape on Friday.  Adding insult to injury, there is mounting evidence that Greece is about to default, and could be forced to ‘leave the Eurozone’.  So Friday was a complete washout with the DOW down (at times) over 300 points, and the S&P under its 50-day moving average.  I thought that the market would struggle with its all-time highs, but not fall for 350 points.  I didn’t see that one coming. 

So, does that mean that we are in correction mode?  It could be.  But remember: (a) It's April – and April is historically a good month for the market, and (b) for the past 6 years, buyers have come in and ‘bought the dip’ each time this market has been hit really hard.

If I come in on Monday and there is no stabilization, and we continue to fall – the next stop would be around S&P 2060, then down to 2040.  If we lose S&P 2040, we could be looking at the beginning of the first ugly correction in over 6 years.  

This market has come one heck of a long way over the last 6 years.  The bull is tired, and all of the manipulations and QE's have run their course.  This is a desperate time for the market, especially with some of the things we see coming later in the year concerning China and the IMF.  Therefore, if the market continues to bleed this week and touches 2040, it could time to start selling.  If (however) the S&P bounces back above 2084 on Monday (it’s 50-day moving average) – we could quickly forget Friday's plunge.  It is nothing short of ‘interesting’ out there.


TIPS:

The following chart is showing the technical indicators favoring an upward movement in the S&P and DOW this coming week.  


  
Currently looking at:
-       S&P (SPY), NASDAQ (QQQ), and Russell (IWM) shorts and puts

I’m currently holding:
-       GLD – BOUGHT MAY Call Debit Spread: +112 / -120,
-       NUGT – BOUGHT MAY Calls: +10, and
-       ORCL – BOUGHT MAY / JUNE Call Calendar: $45 

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0


To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>