RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, August 24, 2014

This Week in Barrons - 8-24-2014

This Week in Barrons – 8-24-2014

Can’t We ALL Just Get Along?
















These are the words that President Obama must say to himself every night before he goes to sleep.  This week it was reported:
-       76% of Americans are dis-satisfied at the direction things are moving.  Therefore, as CNBC continues to tout happy consumer sentiment numbers, the facts are: 76% of us are NOT happy.
-       36% of American families have absolutely NO savings for retirement.  Not a 401K, a savings account, or even a handful of bonds that they may have received as a child.
-       The FED continued to cut QE and reaffirmed its thinking that interest rates will start to increase around Q2 of 2015.  But over the past 2 years, hasn’t corporate borrowing exceeded every record in the books?  Yes.  And when interest rates rise, won’t all ‘heck’ break loose?  Yes.  Because when interest rates rise, not only will the U.S. Government be harmed (as it will have to pay many more billions to finance its debt), but much of Corporate America (due to stock buy-backs and bonuses) will NOT be able to repay their higher debt payments.
     -    The Chicago Sun-Times reported that Obamacare was responsible for the cut in groundskeeper hours at the home of the Chicago Cubs – Wrigley Field.  This caused the grounds crew’s inability to get a tarp on the field in order to prevent the postponement of a baseball game.  The reason for the cutbacks was the health care coverage requirement under the Affordable Care Act, said the Sun-Times.
     -   AND, as more and more nations join the BRIC’s and decide to use the Chinese Yuan and the Russian Ruble for trade, we see nations pushing back against the insanity of the sanctions that Europe and the U.S. are implementing against Russia.  This week the Czech Finance Minister came out and said that the ‘Western alliance is getting increasingly weaker, and the sanctions on Russia make no sense.’

So we can’t ‘All just get along’ because record numbers of us are broke, unhappy, scared of impending rate hikes, are only working ‘part time’ due to Obamacare, and feel deserted as it’s unclear whether the U.S. can even ‘buy friends’ at this point.

This behavior is on top of:
-       Our Government changing the way inflation is calculated, in order to prevent increased social security outlays.  FYI: If we go back to the pre-1980 inflation model, we are running at 9.7% inflation.
-       Our Government changing the way GDP is calculated so we can improve our abysmal growth rate.  The first revision of the 2nd quarter GDP estimate (4%) is coming out on August 28th.  For those of you that thought the first quarter negative 2.9% GDP was an anomaly, I say that the 2nd quarter 4% GDP is the real anomaly.  I believe it will be revised much lower, and we will see weaker results in the 3rd quarter as well.
-       AND Our Government changing the way FICO credit scores are compiled – in order to allow for more people with credit issues to buy things they don’t need with money they’d don’t have.

So if we can’t – ‘All just get along’ – what should we do?  We know that the economy is fake.  We know that our debts too large to repay.  We know that one day the wheels will come off.  We know that the stock market is rigged, BUT at this point it’s rigged to go UP.  So it stands to reason that owning stocks (while they're being pushed higher) makes a lot of sense.  I find it interesting that people will drive all the way across town to buy an item that's on sale, but when the metals (silver and gold) are on sale – nobody buys them except the Chinese and Russians.  Both countries have trillions of assets based in dollars.  They know that dollars become increasingly worthless every time the FED prints more.  So smart countries have been buying all the gold that they can get their hands on.  Because, when the dollar begins to fall, gold will offset that fall.   

My approach is simple.  I use the markets for income, and then save money by way of physical, precious metals.  The bottom line is this – I can think of no other vehicle that can produce the same kind of income as the stock market (for the average individual).  You will need some education, but the education is available.

Remember: Kool-Aid makes you feel better.  But it is nothing more than a sugary drink that also makes you fat, dumb, and complacent.  NO – we can’t ‘just ALL get along.’

















The Market...

Monday was one of those incredible snap back days (up 200 points) that just caught everyone a bit off guard.  And Tuesday didn't retreat, but rather pushed us even higher.  No one seemed to care that it was the second lowest volume day, equaling such notables as Christmas Eve, and New Years.  By the time Wednesday came around, the indexes had gone from slightly oversold to overbought, but the markets continued to climb.  Was there good news?  Well:
-       Mortgage applications for home purchases fell another 0.4%.
-       Target (the retailer) missed earnings and warned for the rest of the year, lowering their guidance.
-       Automobile repossessions (from people not paying their loans) have surged an incredible 70% year over year, and those in the 30-60 day late bucket advanced noticeably.
-       And Bank of America agreed to a $17 Billion fine – to pay off the mortgage-backed fraud they perpetrated during the big melt down.

On Friday the Russians and the "West" were tossing insults back and forth.  The Russians had ordered their aid convoy into the Ukraine – which the Ukrainian Government instantly said was a provocation and escalation of war.  Moments later, they actually let the Russians in, as to not to seem confrontational.  As the day wore on, more and more officials called the Russian build up of troops near the border a 'dangerous situation’, and again the Ukraine changed their story and said the convoy was paramount to an attack.  This went back and forth for hours and it did indeed have some market participants wondering if buying more stock made sense in such a tense time.

Ms. Yellen spoke on Friday and two things were very clear: (a) Quantitative Easing will end in October, and (b) the FED will continue to keep interest rates low for a while – their estimate is either into Q1 or Q2 of 2015.  I’m thinking around April of next year, the FED will lose control of the interest rate situation.

I think that we will see a soggy market in September as traders begin to fear the end of QE.  It will somewhat be a reverse of: "Buy the Rumor, Sell the News".  I think that it’s very possible that with the market flirting with all-time highs (which is currently offering a bit of overhead resistance) and QE ending will put exert some downside pressure on the indices.

For the upcoming week, if the Ukrainian/Russian situation cools off a bit, the market will make one more push back up and over the highs – especially going into the holiday weekend.  If (however) the situation continues to ramp up, then I think we will move sideways and slightly down on the week.


Tips:

My current list of potential candidates is much lighter this week.  Some names I am looking at are: COST, SLW, CBRL, BA, UTX, SLB, COP, UNH, AET, PII, URI, BAX, BEAV, OEX, SPX and SPY.  As you know, these are just candidates of interest, and the trade set-up has to be right to take the trade.  In terms of directional trades:
-       BUY TLT (the Bond ETF) and BUY UBT the (leveraged bond ETF),
-       SELL CSIQ – PCS’s (Put Credit Spreads) – as it’s extended,
-       SELL TRIP – CCS’s (Call Credit Spreads) – 1 SD (standard deviation) out,
-       BUY MA – Longer dated Calls, and SELL PCS’s (short term),
-       BUY CME – Longer dated Calls, and SELL PCS’s (short term),
-       SELL BIDU – PCS’s (Put Credit Spreads),
-       SELL VIPS – PCS’s (Put Credit Spreads), and
-       SELL SPY, QQQ, DIA, and IWM – PCS’s (Put Credit Spreads).

My current short-term holds are:
-       AAPL (Tech) – in @ $92.86 – (currently $101.43),
-       KO (Beverage) – in @ $41.17 – (currently $41.12),
-       LNG (Energy) – in @ $57.40 – (currently $75.43),
-       NUGT (Gold) – in @ $41.10 – (currently $43.03),
-       TLT (Bonds) – in @ 112.32 – (currently $117.29),
-       SLV (Silver) – in @ $20.17 – (currently $18.69)
-       SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 13.44), and
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 123.19)

My Small Caps (LEJU is moving):
-       FET (Oil) – in @ $25.14 – (currently $32.87),
-       GTAT (Tech) – in @ $17.84 – (currently $18.15),
-       IDTI (Tech) – in @ $15.08 – (currently $16.34),
-       IG (Tech) – in @ $6.24 – (currently $6.00),
-       LEJU (Tech) – in @ $13.07 – (currently $18.41),
-       PEIX (Oil) – in @ $19.34 – (currently $21.16),
-       RFMD (Tech) – in @ $11.05 – (currently $11.81),
-       TSRA (Tech) – in @ $28.05 – (currently $29.28),
-       VDSI (Tech) – in @ $14.17 – (currently $14.26), and
-       VTNR (Oil) – in @ $7.87 – (currently $8.27)

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>



Sunday, August 17, 2014

This Week in Barrons - 8-17-2014

This Week in Barrons – 8-17-2014

Due Diligence:












Ever since the 1920's, the practice of ‘due diligence’ has been the mantra of the financial community.  To avoid getting caught up in the crazes, or the lies – smart investors pour over financial statements in order to discover elements such as fake companies and ponzi schemes.  This fundamental analysis was the most important term in investing for the next 85 years.

Since ‘due diligence’ takes time, effort and knowledge, the cottage industry of ‘financial analysts’ was born.  Financial analysts are paid to look deep into a company, confirming their true sales, their true assets versus liabilities, the market trends and then (based on those findings) place a rating on the company.  The feeling being that if sales were growing and revenues were exceeding expenses, it stood to reason that the company would become more profitable over time – and hopefully share that good fortune with the shareholders.  Therefore, people owning the company's stock would likely see a dividend, and (as the company became more profitable) its share price would rise.  It just made sense.

Unfortunately, one of the saddest things that I've had to tell people over the past 10 years is that when it comes to stocks, I don't care about: (a) the company, (b) what it makes, (c) their earnings, (d) their new CEO, or virtually anything other than the market technicals.  Why?  Because the fundamentals have become virtually worthless.  Corporate numbers are so tweaked and distorted lately, that they bear no resemblance to reality.  And how can you use fundamentals and ‘due diligence’ to judge a company, when the numbers you're using to determine its value are corrupt?

My favorite example of worthless ‘due diligence’ is FASB’s (Financial Accounting and Standards Board) decision to let banks mark their assets to ‘Model’ rather than to ‘Market’.  Can you imagine?  That's like me telling you that your house (according to my computer model) is worth $500,000 when (in fact) nothing has sold in your neighborhood in the past 3 years over $100,000.  Yet if I was a bank - I could list it as a $500,000 dollar asset on my books – because it’s value is based upon my computer ‘Model’ not any ‘Market’ relevance.  I can’t even imagine the amount of over-priced assets out there on bankers’ books.  

On the stock side, my favorite ‘due diligence’ example is CYNK Technology Corp.  CYNK is a social media development company that recently had a market capitalization in excess of $1 billion.  CYNK was founded in 2008 but has never commenced operations, only had one employee, no website, no revenue, no product and no assets.  This year the stock has traded for 10 cents (or less) through June 16, after which it began a ride up to a closing price of $13.90 on July 10.  We’re not talking about the tech craze of the 90's here – this was just a month ago.  But that same greed, hype, made-up figures, lies and manipulations allowed CYNK to rise just like: (a) the 1920’s run up and crash, (b) the 1990's run up and crash, and (c) the 2007 run up and crash.

Speaking of ‘due diligence’, does this sound like a healthy global economy?  Last week:
-       Germany and France's GDPs fell,
-       The German 10-year bond fell below 1% for the first time in HISTORY,
-       Wal-Mart warned for the balance of the year – blaming Obama-care,
-       Italy, Romania and Cyprus are in recession,
-       The Belgium, Czech, German, Latvian, Hungarian, and Polish stock markets are all down considerably year to date, and
-       The Euro-Zone's three largest economies (which account for two-thirds of the $12.8 Trillion dollar GDP) posted 0% growth.  

Now, how exactly does that news translate into a bullish signal for stocks?  If you can't trust the fundamentals to make your investing decisions, what can you use?  I’ll say: (a) use your own common sense, (b) your ability to connect the dots, and (c) a stock’s technical patterns (given computer trading makes up over 70% of the current trading volume on Wall Street).  Find the right chart patterns, try to be in the right sectors at the right time, and you'll do fine.

The point of all this is simple: fundamentals used to be a good way to invest for the long term, but those days are long gone.  Honestly, there isn't a sole alive that really believes our vaunted Federal Reserve when they tell us that inflation is running below 2%.  Yet, the entire credit market uses their numbers as the basis for swaps, bond rates, and social security benefits.  Just know that the closer we get to the mid-term elections the more absurd these numbers (and lack of ‘due diligence’) is going to become.  Welcome to ‘fantasy football’ season – it’s right around the corner.

The Market...

For a minute on Friday (after listening to the news flow out of Russia and the Ukraine) I thought I was living in the Matrix.  The market was up by 65 points, and at 11am it turned on a dime and went to being down 80.  The news that was hitting the wires was a statement out of the Ukraine that said a Russian convoy of arms had tried crossing into the Ukraine, and the Ukrainian military blew it up.   This naturally led to a lot of speculation about what Russia might do in retaliation.  
Then the strangest thing happened.  The Russians put out a statement saying that they did NOT have an arms convoy crossing the border, and that the Ukrainian statement was a fantasy.

Instantly, the world tried to do their ‘due diligence’ – looking for photos of the wrecked convoy, but there were none to be found.  Wait a minute.  The Ukrainians – the good guys (yes) - said that they blew up a convoy of weapons and there are NO pictures?  IF the Russians are sending convoys of weapons to the rebels and the Ukrainians blew them up, wouldn’t we have a true escalation-taking place?  But IF the Ukrainians simply made up this story to further the pressure against the Russians, then that (in and of itself) is an escalation.  In either event, that entire situation isn't good.

But if nothing goes ‘bump in the night’ over the weekend, I think we see the market shake off the jitters and push us higher, in a nervous, herky-jerky fashion – fully knowing that weird news could hit at virtually any time.  This is a wacko-market where buying smaller positions and taking your profits quickly is the way to play.  Don't swing for the fences (just yet) in this market.

Tips:

I continue to follow my plan – looking for ‘income plays’ (spread trades) and monitoring the positions closely.   When I say ‘spread trades’ I mean:
-       IF a stock is moving up or sideways, then I ‘SELL’ a Put-Credit Spread, 1 standard deviation out of the money, and
-       IF a stock is moving down or sideways, then I ‘SELL’ a Call-Credit Spread, 1 standard deviation out of the money.

My current list of potential spread candidates include: AZO, CBRL, HOG, BA, CMG, UTX, SLB, PII, URI, BAX, KRE, BEAV, OEX, CBI, TWX, SHPG and SPY.  In terms of directional trades:
-       Buying TLT (the Bond ETF) on pullbacks to the 8-day and 21-day moving averages, and selling at extensions has been working nicely for the past 11 months, and
-       Buying stocks that have a mind of their own (despite what the market is doing) such as TSLA, FFIV, AAPL, NFLX and CMG continues to work in weekly increments.

Examples of 2 spread trades that we did this week are:
-       EWZ – the Brazilian ETF.  Days ago, Brazilian Presidential candidate - Eduardo Campos was killed in a plane crash.  This sent the entire Brazilian market lower, and sent EWZ down by as much as 2.6%.  It is now holding support at its 100-day moving average.  The volumes are elevated, and I therefore sold an Iron Condor for September expiration.  I used 2-point wide strikes to limit my risk.  I SOLD the SEPT – 45/ + 43 PUT’s & the - 52 / +54 CALL’s for $0.45 per share.
-       IWM – the small cap ETF.  I think that there is a good set-up here for September.  There are elevated volumes, and nice premiums to be sold.  Again, I used 2-point wide strikes to limit my risk.  I SOLD the SEPT – 106 / + 104 PUT’s & the - 118 / +120 CALL’s for $0.50 per share. 

My current short-term holds are:
-       AAPL (Tech) – in @ $92.86 – (currently $97.98),
-       DLTR (Retail) – in @ $51.97 – (currently $55.60),
-       KO (Beverage) – in @ $41.17 – (currently $40.88),
-       LNG (Energy) – in @ $57.40 – (currently $73.23),
-       NUGT (Gold) – in @ $41.10 – (currently $46.94),
-       TLT (Bonds) – in @ 112.32 – (currently $117.71),
-       SLV (Silver) – in @ $20.17 – (currently $18.86)
-       SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 14.06), and
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 125.48)

Diving back into some Small Caps:
-       FET (Oil) – in @ $25.14 – (currently $32.36),
-       GTAT (Tech) – in @ $17.84 – (currently $17.36),
-       IDTI (Tech) – in @ $15.08 – (currently $15.22),
-       IG (Tech) – in @ $6.24 – (currently $6.12),
-       LEJU (Tech) – in @ $13.07 – (currently $13.57),
-       PEIX (Oil) – in @ $19.34 – (currently $20.38),
-       RFMD (Tech) – in @ $11.05 – (currently $11.54),
-       TSRA (Tech) – in @ $28.05 – (currently $28.73),
-       VDSI (Tech) – in @ $14.17 – (currently $14.23), and
-       VTNR (Oil) – in @ $7.87 – (currently $7.86)

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>