RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, April 20, 2014

This Week in Barrons - 4-20-2014

This Week in Barrons – 4-20-2014

The best place to hide something is right in plain sight.



Sometimes the easiest way to hide something is to put it out there – in plain sight.  Recently, a study was done to examine people’s perceptions as they were walking.  The subjects were asked to walk down a sidewalk and report any unusual findings.  The sidewalk was of regular size.  Along one side of the sidewalk was a brick wall, with the other side being open to the street.  All the people had to do was stroll along the walk, and report anything they may find unusual.  One by one the test subjects walked the sidewalk, and virtually every one of them found the quarter that the testers had placed on the sidewalk itself.   Not one single person noticed any of the $10 bills that were taped to the brick wall – exactly 7 feet off the ground.  Not one person.  Everyone looked "down" and found the 25 cents, while no one looked up to find $10.  The real prize (that was worth 40 TIMES what they found) was hidden – right there in plain sight.

In my line of work, sometimes the most glaring evidence is hidden from us in plain sight.  For example, this week we all paid our taxes, but studies tell me that less than one percent of us know: Why we have taxes?  Enter Beardsley Ruml – an American statistician, economist, philanthropist, planner, adviser to President Herbert Hoover, director and chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, active in the Bretton Woods Conference (that established the international monetary system), and was paramount in planning the ‘New Deal’.

In 1945 Mr. Ruml made a famous speech to the American Banking Association (ABA), saying that since the end of the gold standard, “Taxes for Revenue are Obsolete”.  The real purposes of taxes were:
      To "stabilize the purchasing power of the dollar",
-       To "express public policy in the distribution of wealth and of income, in subsidizing or in penalizing various industries and economic groups", and
-       To "isolate and assess directly the costs of certain national benefits, such as highways and social security.”

Obviously the two issues I wish to highlight are: (a) the RE-distribution of wealth and income, and (b) to subsidize or PENALIZE various industries and economic groups.   This was almost 70 years ago, and to this day the facts are hidden very well – in plain sight.

Another example:  A small (but not insignificant) group of individuals have been screaming that the stock ‘market is rigged’ for almost as long as the market has existed.  Most have been laughed at, called kooks, conspiracy nuts, right wing whackos, and generally discarded.  Then Michael Lewis writes a book about High Frequency Trading (HFT), and suddenly ‘the market is rigged’ is on everyone's lips.  This same market, has been right in front of our faces for years – explained, detailed, and deciphered – yet ignored.

Of course it’s not just the stock market and taxes that are rigged:
-       Interest rates are rigged.  People hear about LIBOR and (since it seems so exotic) they shrug their shoulders swearing that it doesn’t really affect them.  Honestly, not too many years ago you could put $100,000 in the bank and make $7,000 a year in interest.  Now you make ZERO.
-       Energy markets are rigged.  They see J.P. Morgan get slapped with billions in fines for energy market tampering, and they’re not connecting the dots as to how gasoline has doubled in price over the past 5 years while demand (since 2004) has fallen like a rock.
-       Corporate accounting is rigged.  Corporate reporting standards have lapsed so much that corporations are no longer required to abide by GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) regulations when reporting their financial numbers.
-       Gold is rigged.  On Tuesday at 8:30am the gold market recorded a ‘fake’ sale of $500 million in futures – causing gold to fall $30 in a single hour.
-       Our own FED is telling us that there is NO inflation; meanwhile the price of food (alone) has increased 19% in the past 4 months (since January of 2014).

I think that the angst most people feel around tax day isn't that they detest paying the taxes, but they abhor how their tax dollars are being spent.  Our own government hides the facts in plain sight, counting on no one being able to see them. 

A couple of thoughts (for Easter):
-       Look up – more than down,
-       Think and Listen – more than talk, and
-       Reach-out and Act on your own conclusions.

Happy Easter to everyone. 














The Market...

We had a 4-day virtual ‘lift off’ that took the DOW from a low of 16,028 on Monday, to a close of 16,409 on Thursday.  We seem to have run back to the 16,460 area of resistance.  On April 9 we closed at 16,437 before falling in 3 days to 16,028.  On March 10 we closed at 16,418 before plunging to 16,046.  Naturally the question is, do we fall again, or do we power up and set our sights on the double top at the 16,600 area?

If you've noticed one thing in the past couple of years it's the fact that this market is very tough to short.  The reason is clear.  Every time we set up for a fade, the FED cuts that fade short after a very quick 2 - 4% dip, and then blasts it right back up.  I'm actually tired of writing how we get these perfect ‘correction’ set-ups, only to see the FED short circuit the correction and push us higher.  So, while the single biggest stock gains come during downtrends (because they’re so fast and violent), I really haven’t been ‘short’ since the 2008 crash.

In the past 2 weeks, Ms. Yellen (before Congress) stated that QE would end by the fall of 2014, and about 6 months later interest rates would rise.  The markets went down violently on her words.  This week Ms. Yellen came out and reversed herself, saying that because the labor market is so soft, the FED will need to keep rates low for an extended period.  The markets soared back up on her words.  Unfortunately, the markets are NOT moving on economic fundamentals, but rather moving on whether the FED will continue to fill the punch bowl.  In many ways this more resembles a ‘drug addiction’ than ‘investing’.  As long as our dealer can provide us with the stuff we’re good, but as soon as the dealer cuts us off – we go into withdrawal.

I said it before and I’ll say it again:  IF the FED stops tapering, or (worse) reverses their taper and does more QE – we’re headed toward DOW 18,000 and higher.  It won't matter if the economy grinds to an absolute halt and goes into a full-scale depression.  With that in mind, I have no choice but to continue to find the ‘long side’ opportunities.  It feels wrong (almost ‘dirty’), but the fact is that the markets are convinced that the FED will always support them, and therefore a dip is just another buying opportunity.

We all know that this will end badly.  A chink in the armor could be the NASDAQ.  It’s still in a downtrend.  I’m looking for the NASDAQ buying to stop on Monday, and to continue it’s downtrend – potentially bringing weakness into the S&P and the DOW over the next week or so.

The facts are: of the companies that have reported thus far, 67% of them have MISSED their top line / revenue estimates.  And these ‘estimates’ have already been lowered.  These same companies are beating on the bottom line by not hiring, doing stock buy-backs, and by manipulating their accounting.  Companies can easily ‘adjust’ their earnings per share, but they can't ‘adjust’ their revenues.  Combine that with the fact that just last week beef, pork, shrimp, soybeans and soy meal all hit RECORD high prices.  Combine that with the steady climb back towards $4 per gallon gasoline and stagnant wages.  What you have is a market that does not reflect our true underlying economy.

I'm still leaning slightly long on the DOW, but I’m beginning to nibble on shorting the rallies on the NASDAQ.  Honestly – none of this feels right.  It feels like I’m missing something – that’s right there in plain sight.


Tips:

The $500M ‘fake short’ in Gold surprised me (as it did most people) last week.  Our position in TLT also took a hit last week – presumably on the belief that the dispute in the Ukraine would be settled over this weekend.  I’m still holding my position in (MNKD), for it’s 2% weekly yield on the call options.  MNKD is currently selling for $6.25 / share – with the $6.50 call options paying you 13 cents per week.  The energy sector has been nothing short of ‘on fire’ as of late, with our USO positions soaring for nice gains indeed.  I also opened some positions in smaller stocks that I think have a good chance of doubling (or more) over the next 12 to 18 months.  Those stocks are listed below, and a couple that I’m still following are:  PFIE, LSCC, VNTR and FPP.  This week I see TLT and Gold as being buyable, and potentially the NASDAQ as being a nice short candidate – topping off on Monday. 

My current short-term holds are:
-       MNKD – in @ $6.35 – (currently $6.25)
-       USO (Oil) – in @ $37.19 - (currently $37.68),
-       BXE (Oil) – in @ $9.11 – (currently $9.16),
-       LSG (Gold) – in @ $0.78 – (currently $0.75),
-       NGLS (Nat Gas) – in @ 60.11 – (currently $61.33),
-       POZN (Pharma) – in @ $8.68 – (currently $8.70),
-       PTIE (Pain Tmt) – in @ $5.34 – (currently $5.38),
-       RFMC (Tech) – in @ $7.96 – (currently $7.87),
-       SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 12.33) – no stop,
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 124.74) – no stop ($1,295 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 18.88) – no stop ($19.67 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>



Sunday, April 13, 2014

This Week in Barrons - 4-13-201

This Week in Barrons – 4-13-2014

“Somewhere between Brave and Stupid…”  












I had the pleasure on Friday evening to eat dinner with an old friend, and he asked me: “So what should I invest in?”  After giving him my correlated assets talk (about bonds, the yen, oil, gold and stocks no longer moving as they should), he politely looked at me and asked me the same question – again.  I honestly couldn’t help myself but answer with: Gold and Silver.  He then asked me:  “So why do they remain 30% off their highs?”  And that’s when I felt “somewhere between brave and stupid.” 

Gold and Silver (after hitting their highs in 2011) have been beaten down and kept in some kind of dungeon.  Considering all of the ills of this world, inflation, and instability – does it make sense that gold and silver can't move up?  It does if you understand some of the rationale behind why both precious metals remain ‘capped’.

With Silver, the two most common reasons for its ‘cap’ are:
-       Most of it’s demand is industrial.  With China slowing, and the remainder of the world crippled with their lousy economies, silver demand has been reduced.
-       Silver hasn't been thought of as a form of money since we stopped using it in coinage; therefore, there’s no ‘investment’ demand as alternative currency.

Allow me to address both of those concerns.  In terms of demand, something quite spectacular is occurring in the energy world.  The dream of solar energy actually being price-competitive with hydrocarbon fuels is very near.  The newer technologies have been able to ‘regionally’ reduce the price of solar energy to compete with gas and coal on a kilowatt per hour cost basis.  Because of that, demand for new high tech solar is increasing exponentially, and these solar technologies use more and more silver for their critical electrical connections because of it’s super efficiency.

Along with the rising energy demand, silver is increasingly being used as a medicinal remedy.  Silver has tremendous anti-biological properties, and has been found to be more effective against the most serious of bacterium than even our more high-powered antibiotics.  The demand for silver infused drugs has exploded; therefore, while silver demand in standard industry (including China) may fade, that demand is being replaced by energy and medicine.

In terms of silver supply, there are very few true ‘silver mines’.  90% of all the mined silver is a by-product of looking for other metals like copper and zinc.  As demand for copper, zinc or any of the other industrial metals fall, mines will be closed.  And since silver is found mostly as a co-inhabitant of those same ‘other’ mines, the supply of mined silver will also decrease.

What about Silver as a currency?  Well, of course Wall Street doesn't think Silver is currency – they can't make it out of thin air like they can dollar bills by fractional banking.  It has been a form of wealth and money for thousands of years.  Even in the Bible people talked of land being worth ‘400 pieces of silver’.  I guess the thought of it being worth: ‘400 Federal Reserve notes’ escaped them.

So, if demand is level, supply is falling, and if Silver is still some ‘form’ of currency – why is the price capped?  Simple, Silver (being such a small market) has become the single most manipulated commodity on the planet.  If you thought LIBOR was a scandal, the naked shorting of silver (by J.P. Morgan (JPM) in particular) makes LIBOR look like a kids game.  JPM systematically worked the ETF's, the COMEX, and the miners to drive the price of ‘paper’ silver lower, while the ‘real’ ratio of physical demand to supply continues to increase.

In Gold, the situation is even more bizarre.  When Gold hit its high in 2011, the entire world (simultaneously) became ‘disgusted’ with the incessant devaluing of the U.S. dollar – the ‘world’s global reserve currency’.  As one Chinese finance minister said: “What good is the dollar as the global reserve currency, if they're devaluing it by 40% every year?”  So, around the globe countries decided that they wanted gold, and not U.S. dollars.  Unfortunately, the FED’s business is U.S. dollars and U.S. power – through regulation of our money supply.  If the world doesn’t want U.S. dollars, then they don’t want U.S. Treasuries, and then we can't keep rates low or fund our Government.

Knowing that, our government held talks with the Chinese and agreed on an exchange rate for gold and U.S. Treasuries – as long as the Chinese continued to purchase more U.S. Treasuries.  Currently, however the U.S. has somewhat boxed itself into a corner.  The Chinese want absolutely nothing to do with the U.S. dollar or the Federal Reserve.  They would like their own currency to rank as a global reserve, and they have used the attacks on gold to amass large amounts of it.  Honestly, it was the FED's only way out of a bad situation, and the Chinese used it to their advantage.

So are gold and silver destined to ‘live somewhere between brave and stupid’ and go higher?  If I’m correct, China is going to assert itself as one of the big players in a new global reserve currency, and it’s Gold holdings will play a large part in that.  With talks of a new global reserve, Silver will stop being manipulated, first by JPM and then by the FED.  Unfortunately there are ‘no rules’ when negotiating a new global reserve currency. 
-       Maybe Russia and China are pushed to a point that they speed up the ‘reset’ of the global reserve process.
-       Maybe the currency wars continue and everyone starts dumping U.S. dollars and treasuries.
-       Maybe the world agrees to ignore the U.S. dollar, and buy energy in any currency.
-       Maybe a lot of things, but in the end – Gold and Silver go higher.

Silver will NOT be a part of any new currency, but should revert to the fundamentals of supply and demand which should be between $70 and $100 per ounce (currently at $20/ounce).  Gold, however, is a wildcard.  Under normal conditions it should be around $2,400 per ounce.  But, if China continues on it’s course, then gold could easily be valuded between $4,500 and $7,000 per ounce.  And that’s what I recommended at the dinner.















The Market....

Is it here?  After 30+ months are we finally going to have a true, 10% correction in the markets?   It certainly feels like it.  But, we’ve been in this position so many times, that I feel like the ‘boy who cried wolf’.  Over the past few years, we've had no less than 11 set-ups where the market should have put in such a correction.  The news flow was ripe, the technicals were ripe, and yet the FED took their funny money and drove the market higher.

Here is where (I think) the supporting evidence allows us to reach a different conclusion.  We’ve had many 2% to 4% hiccups in the past.  For example: on January 7th the DOW cratered 7% - from a high of 16,560 – all the way down to 15,356 on February 3rd.  It then (of course) rebounded to set new, all-time highs in the first days of April.

In just a couple of months we've hit an all-time high, dropped a quick 7%, rebounded to new all-time highs, and now we're dropping in ‘free fall’ again.  In other words, the speed and the ferocity of the pops and drops are becoming exaggerated and closer together.  Often, when a market becomes this volatile (with it’s frequency and amplitude), it usually mark a trend change.

If you remember back a couple of months, I did a commentary about the FED as it started the QE Tapering program.  I remarked that it was very odd that the FED would be ‘tapering’ when clearly the economy was barely scraping by.  At that time I suggested that if by the summer we hadn’t see a reverse in course and the FED stopping it’s taper and starting putting money back into the system – then a major shift has indeed occurred.  The most recent FED stance to any market weakness has been to slash rates and print money.  This FED is now slashing the printing of money and threatening rate increases starting next year.

This coming week will produce a lot more bank earnings reports.  JPM’s report last week was a complete disaster.  Wells Fargo was better – which rescued the bank panic temporarily.  But, if the bank reports continue to be poor – it will drag the sector down sharply.  This market usually keys off of the financials.  So, if the financials are flat to rising, then the market should level out; however, if the financials are declining then the market will head lower and everyone along with it.

Thus far we’ve only seen a 4% dip in the S&P and 3.6% drop in the DOW.  Most of the damage has been done to the NASDAQ and to the ‘high-fliers’.  For next week, I will be watching:
-       The YEN (FXY) – if it moves higher it will be tough for the S&P to move higher,
-       The Treasuries (TLT) – if bonds move higher, it’s tough for stocks to ‘catch a bid’,
-       Gold (GLD) and Oil (USO) – if money moves into these benchmark commodities, then stocks should move lower,
-       And Financials (XLF) – if the financials are moving lower (even slightly) – stocks should follow their lead.

Let’s not try and ‘catch a falling knife’ just yet.  There will be plenty of time to play this correction once we see that the FED is allowing it to play out.  Personally – I’m sitting in cash, or at minimum covering what stocks I’m playing by selling ‘covered calls’.  I see no reason to be ‘brave or stupid’ right here.  If you go short (buy PUT options) – and this is just another in the FED’s long string of ‘head fakes’ – you’ll be burned.  If you load up on longs with a ‘buy the dip’ strategy, and this time the financials don’t produce – you’re going to scramble to sell back out.  Sometimes the best play – is not to play.


Tips:

This week the FDA pushed back it’s overall approval date for Mannkind Pharmaceuticals (MNKD) until June 15th.  However, I’m still holding a position in (MNKD), but simply for it’s 3 to 4% PER WEEK yield on it’s call options.  Last week I cashed in some USO options for a nice gain, and correspondingly purchased more June, $35 – USO – call options.  I also cashed in my TLT options last week for a nice profit – and will potentially purchase more early on in the week – if the market continues to sell-off.

My current short-term holds are:
-       MNKD – in @ $6.35 – currently ($6.51)
-       USO (Oil) – in @ $37.19 - (currently $37.18),
-       SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 12.81) – no stop,
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 126.93) – no stop ($1,318 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 19.19) – no stop ($20.00 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>