RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, September 1, 2013

This Week in Barrons - 9-1-2013


This Week in Barrons – 9-1-2013
 
As the World Turns

We’ve seen some disturbing elements concerning gold come out of India recently.  Currently, India runs the world’s third largest account deficit.  They have been having a very hard time defending their currency, and they've employed a lot of underhanded tricks to try and halt its erosion.  In a twisted flashback to what the U.S. did back in the 30's (when our government confiscated everyone's gold), India appears to be running straight down the same track.  Since the middle of last year, India has implemented 24 "gold un-friendly" actions in order to have their citizens avoid buying gold, and instead use their own currency (the Rupee) for transactions and savings.  Each one of these 24 measures has failed miserably, and the latest action in the Indian stock market shows that things are indeed – broken – over there.

The people of India have cherished gold for thousands of years.  From Temples to jewelry, Indians have always known that "gold is king".  They learned during centuries of tumult that personal ownership of gold would afford them some protection of their family wealth.  Unfortunately India’s government has lost control of their economy.  And (just like in the U.S.), when things get desperate – they look for money in every nook and cranny.  The Indian Government knows that their citizens want gold much more than they want Rupee's, and they continue to try ways to push them away from gold.  They have:
-       Increased gold import duties – 3 times,
-       Asked the jeweler’s guild to stop selling gold bars,
-       Halted sales of gold coins,
-       Increased taxes on gold, and
-       Implemented trading stoppages.

One of the largest components of their large trade deficit is their importation of gold to satisfy consumer demand.  Therefore, the government is taking measures to halt importing gold.  The idea being that if there is no gold coming into the country, there will be no gold to buy.  Currently the government is also starting a program where banks are trying to get customers to "sell" their gold – to the banks – in exchange for currency.  The government knows that they will have to offer a premium for the gold, but that's okay – because they print the Rupees anyway.  If they have to print more of them to pay the premium, so be it.  I think India is going to try and settle some of the gap in their trade deficit account by amassing ‘extra’ gold from it’s citizens and selling it into the market.

The problem is that the Indian people aren't going to change 2,500 years of culture overnight.  I can’t see husbands deciding that they would rather have slips of paper adorning their wives necks rather than gold necklaces.  But desperate countries do desperate things.  I think that their next step will be to forcibly "take-back" a percentage of the average citizen’s gold.  The very same thing the U.S. did to our citizens in 1933.

I bring this topic up for a couple reasons.  One, to demonstrate that it isn’t just the U.S. and Europe that are technically insolvent and desperate.  There are many countries in this same situation.  Second, since I am a stout believer in holding gold, this will cause a disturbance to the gold market when it happens.  When the government of India grabs a large portion of gold from their citizens, and sells it back to the world to satisfy it’s account deficit – this will indeed have a large impact on the gold market.

I don't think that the price of gold will actually fall that far, and I think that the June lows are the lows for many years to come.  But, if the Indian government announces that they are going to implement a form of confiscation with the determination to sell it into the market, the price of gold will go down.  But in what currency?  Gold is priced in home currency – dollars – rupees – euros – yen, etc.  If India dumps tons of gold into the market, I think that India and her neighbors will indeed see their currency reset on value, but all across the globe others will scramble to get their hands on as much gold as they can – so that they can "hide it", and thereby support the global price.  If I'm right and this plays out over the next year, I could easily see a pretty hefty dip hit gold's price, only to see it soar right back up and even considerably higher.

What we're seeing is another country in the death throws of a failed (print-till-you-drop) economic policy.  I dislike the idea of a global melt down and reset, but I cannot ignore the fact that one is coming.  We've seen Greece, Spain, Italy, Ireland, and Portugal – all kick the can down the road.  We've seen the U.S. up its debt ceiling a dozen times.  We've seen Japan come out with a monetary ‘shock and awe’ program.  And India will need to try their way as well.  Keep your eyes open for news out of India, and when you see it, prepare yourself to "buy the dip".  The initial action will hit the global gold market, but it will not be the end of gold's rise.

Oh – before I forget - I hope you all can forget about all this craziness for a few days and enjoy your Labor Day holiday with family and friends.  Some good food, good drink and good company can do wonders for the soul, if even for just a couple days.

The Market...

This week, the DOW was only off 200 points from beginning to end of week.  The Fed’s taper, tensions over the Middle East, combined with some poor results coming from the emerging markets – has the markets more eager to play "safe than sorry".  The current market action resembles walking on eggshells.  One word out of a Fed head about tapering, or one Kerry appearance on TV – and we’re down 100 DOW points.  There's simply too much going on out there for anyone to feel that they can take a new position and not have it tossed right back in their face.  The fact that we're ONLY down 200 this week is a true testament to how savage the appetite for stocks still is out there.  With all of the ills facing the globe, we could easily fall another thousand points.

We still have crazy Ben Bernanke and his band of Merry Fed heads to deal with on September 18th.  If he announces tapering (even if it's just "Taper Light" of $10B), I think that this market will have a tough time continuing upward.  And with President Obama asking Congress for approval on his bombing plan – that should give the market time to put in a bounce this week.  It won't take us to the old highs, you can’t marry it, but I do think it will be buyable for a decent trade.  

D.S. wrote us with some information from legendary investor – Jim Rogers.  Mr. Rogers is a commodity and gold guru and owns a fair amount of oil and gold.  He told Reuters:  "If there is going to be a war, and it sounds like America's desperate to have a war, commodities and gold are going to go much, much higher.  Stocks are going to go down, but commodities are going to go up.  No matter how well the plans are made, strange things happen in war, and who knows what unintended consequences will come.  But, throughout history, whenever you had war, things like food prices have gone up a lot, energy prices have gone up a lot, along with copper and lead."

Mr. Rogers goes on to comment about emerging markets: “India, Indonesia, Turkey — all have huge balance of trade deficits – which they've been able to finance by printing artificial ‘free’ money.  This artificial sea of liquidity is going to end, and when it ends, all of the people depending on this free money are going to suffer – and suffer badly.  We haven’t seen much of anything yet.  Normally, in bear markets, things go down 40 to 80 percent, and people give up.  People throw their shares out of the window.  We have not yet seen panic and terror, but we will when central banks finally pull back from their easing.  This is the first time in recorded history that all major central banks have been flooding the market with artificially printed money – all at the same time.  When this ends, it's going to be a huge mess."

Tips:
I stopped out of FCX last week for a $2 gain.  When looking at the charts – I’m thinking the following look good for a trade:
-       SLCA over 24.00,
-       UNXL over 19.65,
-       FMC over 67.50 is interesting, and
-       LL over 103.00 could pop nicely.

My current short-term holds are:
-       FB – in at 25.61 (currently 41.32) - stop at 39.00,
-       SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 15.43) – no stop
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 134.71) – no stop ($1,396.10 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 22.67) – no stop ($23.46 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! a

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>

Sunday, August 25, 2013

This Week in Barrons - 8.25.2013

This Week in Barrons – 8-25-2013
 
Germany Declares Bitcoin Legal Tender – This changes everything…

I absolutely believe that "the only constant is change".  Whether you're speaking of the climate, geography, or just the "Tuesday night bowling league" given enough time – it will change.  Currently, it isn't just the fact that things are changing that is so amazing; it's how fast things are changing and how diverse those changes are.

To be honest, my first encounter with Bitcoin was through my youngest son.  Bitcoin (since its inception in 2009) is the poster child for global, digital currency.  Bitcoin could either become one of the biggest, disruptive inventions of the last 200 years, or a failed experiment costing billions.

Just so we’re all on the same page, in 2008 an anonymous person (or persons) going by the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" laid out plans for a peer-to-peer electronic currency system.  How it works is: a series of computers (called "miners") create units of digital currency, and add them to a ledger that is shared by all the Bitcoin programs around the world.  There is a schedule of when and how many of these digital units get developed, and the total amount created is never to exceed 21 million Bitcoins.

Bitcoin users can "buy" Bitcoins (digital currency units) and use them for transactions – by  "spending" them with any other person or merchant that will accept them.  So in theory (and in practice), what we have here is an alternative currency with some interesting properties.  First off (and the most serious) is that it is completely private.  There is no central banker.  There are no records showing who owns them.  There is no paper trail telling ‘big brother’ what you purchased.  Thus, the first knock against this alternative currency is that it will be used for illegal purposes.  That is usually what you'll hear as ‘main stream’ attempts to downplay the concept and use of Bitcoin.  

They are right.  By being completely transaction invisible, there are those individuals who would use them to buy illegal items.  If you're a heroin dealer and you want to buy opiates from a grower in Asia, mailing a check, or using a credit card is out of the question.  Using cash carries its own problems such as currency conversion, and the banking regulators can immediately look for a trail of large cash withdrawals and deposits.  With Bitcoin you can electronically transfer funds from account to global ledger to merchant account.  So yes, Bitcoins can be used for nefarious purposes.  

But the main reason why so many Governments are scared of Bitcoin is that they can’t control it.  They can't tax it.  It takes the power of a central authority out of the hands of the few and places it into the hands of the many.  This scares governments to death, and rightfully so.  As far as I'm personally concerned, my fears are not based upon anonymity, or the way it can take power away from the banking elite; moreover, I find both of those things quite delightful.  My fears have always been with: 1) Security, 2) Perceived value, and 3) How hard Governments would push back to make it illegal and declare its use "financial terrorism".

The value of Bitcoin has been problematic, as one would expect from a fledgling experiment of this size.  The dollar value of a Bitcoin has swung massively over the years, mostly when a security failure or a hacking took place.  In less than a year it's been as low as $13 and as high as $230.  Because it isn't backed by anything, not even a regulating body or (like with the dollar) the "full faith of the U.S. Government" – it fluctuates based upon perceived value and demand.  People have run from it when there were numerous hacking attempts, and those same people have embraced it in times of crisis like the Cyprus banking disaster.

My stance has always been fairly simple.  I love the idea that governments have pushed back against the Bitcoin system.  Even with this headwind, Bitcoin has forged ahead – trying to come up with something better than the depreciating junk that we currently carry around in our wallets.  But, because it is new, fraught with mishaps, missteps, and wild fluctuations – I haven’t been personally invested or directly involved with it.  Not to mention the fact that I'm sure Uncle Sam would like to make even the idea of it illegal.  

But on Tuesday of this week, something quite amazing happened.  While an ever-growing body of merchants around the world has been accepting Bitcoins as payment for product and services, it was still considered (by most) as being a fad or a short-term trend.  Then (on Tuesday) Germany's finance minister came out and declared that: “Bitcoin is recognized as a unit of account".  This meant that Germany now views Bitcoin as legal tender.  

By having an economy as big and as important as Germany, recognize Bitcoin as a true unit of account (on par with other currencies), Bitcoin has just leapt from the shadows into the limelight.  This is a truly incredible development, but it asks more questions than it answers.  Will Germany come up with some way to try and tax it?  Will Germany attempt to make disclosure of ownership a Bitcoin requirement?  Will other countries open up to it, or fear losing control of their Central banking and declare it illegal?  

Something with as much potential as Bitcoin cannot be ignored.  Yet, it is very hard to embrace as it goes through its growing pains.  Hundreds of people have lost thousands of dollars in Bitcoin exchanges that have been hacked and shut down.  Officials in high offices have declared it to be a terrorist tool.  Social scientists fear it – because if they cannot tax it, they can't promote and pay for social services they so dearly love.  And $200 price fluctuations make it scary for conservative investors.  

I do not currently own any Bitcoins.  That very well may change in the future.  Time may show us that Bitcoin is not only real, but the first model of an even bigger concept where the decentralization of money becomes the global goal.  I don't know.  But from its inception and 5 years later have Germany embrace it as legal tender is certainly reason enough to stand up and take notice.  This could ‘literally’ change everything! 

The Market...

A while back The Ben Bernanke scared everyone into believing that he's going to begin tapering off the QE gas pedal in September.  That sent the market into a tizzy, and we fell 700 points over a couple weeks.  Then, because of the market's fall, some of those that were saying that the taper was indeed coming, have changed their minds, while others began to say that the market wouldn't care if they do because it's all "priced in".

If you equate the DOW 15,600 level to the $85B per month that the Fed is pumping into the system – then if the Fed cuts back to $60B – the appropriate DOW level would be approximately 14,650.  Therefore, for each $20B the Fed stops spending, you can subtract approximately 1,000 DOW points.  This is a very rough estimate, but one that actually makes a bit of sense.

I can make the case for both sides of the ‘taper’ argument, and right this moment I'm still slightly on the side that says that they won't taper in September.  Despite the fact that I know QE hasn't solved the economy (and the Feds know it too), they also know that QE keeps the market buoyant and thus creates the "wealth effect".  Is the Fed willing to reduce that?  In the short term – maybe, but in the longer term, ONLY Fed money can keep this market up because the economy cannot.  Factually: 
-       New home sales plunged 13% this month (a huge drop).
-       Mortgage applications have fallen so much that banks are laying off mortgage application personnel.
-       Middle class consumer retailers – from Wal-Mart to J.C. Penny to Macy’s tell us that the middle class is broke.
-       Only 47% of Americans have a full time job – the rest are part-time.
-       The 2nd largest employer in the U.S. is a Temp Agency!
-       Obamacare is another huge expense hitting business and the consumer.  After lying about its affordability, virtually every state has declared that health insurance costs will rise dramatically in the New Year.

The economy is weak and going to get weaker.  If the FED removes money from the system, the market will go lower.  But in the here and now, it looks like the market has decided that it’s time for a bounce.  After hitting bottom on Wednesday, we've bounced for two sessions, regaining the 50-day moving average on the S&P and reclaiming 15k on the DOW.  The DOW transports (which have led virtually all the market moves) have turned up. So there's a decent amount of evidence to say we're going higher for a while.

I think we can lean long for a few days considering that we won't get the word about tapering until September 18.  Between now and then we could see them pile on another few hundred points.  I don't for a moment think you can throw caution to the wind and get crazy, but small positions with a decent stop should be okay.  As we approach September 18th we'll want to be more cautious again.

Tips:
A lot has been written in the past weeks about the moves in precious metals.  Gold, silver and the miners have indeed done very well.  Some “rumors behind the news”:
-       The government has gone to war against J.P. Morgan – not directly against it’s silver manipulation (which at times was 1/3 of the total world market) – but enough that it is forcing JPM to clean up it’s act all over the bank.  How long this scrutiny will last is anyone’s guess at this point.
-       It’s tough to say whether silver or gold are leading the market – but on a percentage basis – the winner (thus far) is clearly silver. 
-       With the physical metal (or lack of it) actually becoming involved in the ‘paper’ pricing mechanism (and we all knew ‘eventually’ that time would come), ‘paper pricing’ has been replaced by ‘physical pricing’. 
-       Currently – between Goldman, JPM, Gartman, Bo Polny, Nenner and others net long on the precious metals trade – don’t fight the Fed / or the major investment houses!

My current short-term holds are:
-       FB – in at 25.61 (currently 40.65) - stop at 38.00,
-       FCX – in at 28.47 (currently 31.76) – stop at 30.50,
-       SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 16.62) – no stop
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 135.00) – no stop ($1,395.70 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 23.14) – no stop ($23.73 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! a

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>