This
Week in Barrons – 3-16-2014
Mick Jagger had it right all along…
I’m remembering the summer of ‘65, “Satisfaction”
by the Rolling Stones was on the radio, and that famous lyric:
“When
I’m drivin’ in my car, and that man comes on the radio,
He’s
tellin’ me more and more, about some useless information,
Supposed’
to fire my imagination.
I
can’t get no… Satisfaction”
It’s days like today that I must give our government
‘planners’ credit for a job well done. When
I was a kid growing up, if you would have told me that (in this day and age)
the world would be more concerned about Miley Cyrus's ‘twerking’ than a
potential World War III, I would not have believed you. But they pulled it off. The Rolling Stones (with their release of
‘Satisfaction’ in 1965) tried to warn us about the onslaught of ‘too much
information’ and our personal inability to filter out the important from
trivial – but we didn’t listen to them.
And so it goes with the Ukraine ‘situation’. I turn on any network ‘news’ show and I hear
about how: “Those bad Russians have taken over Crimea, and are looking to
invade Ukraine". And then around
the ‘water cooler’ I hear: “Don’t they know who they’re dealing with. Let’s go in and kick some Russian ass. They’d better back off.”
I wonder:
I wonder:
- How many know that
this entire ‘Ukrainian mess’ (just like Syria) was inspired and funded by the U.S.?
- How many know there
are tape recordings of our state department trying to select who they will put
in the Ukrainian seat of power – after the uprising is successful?
- How many know that
it was the U.S. funded protesters that snippered people, not the ‘pro Russian’
government?
- And how many of
those, want to take a chance on us winning a nuclear engagement?
On Friday morning Secretary of State John Kerry
had a chat with the Russian diplomat to try and hash out some form of
agreement. Nothing was accomplished
although the hopeful said they thought ‘Putin blinked’. On that ‘rumor’
gold quickly dropped $11 and the DOW gained 90 points, but that reversed and
the DOW ended the day and week negative.
The facts are simple:
- If the Crimea vote
goes off on Sunday (as predicted), and
- If the Crimean
citizens decide to be a part of the Russian Federation (as predicted),
- Then the U.S. and the
European Union will decide to take actions imposing ‘crippling’ sanctions.
In the Obama news bites, he seems to say that the
U.S. will impose: “Crippling sanctions that will make Russia wish it had never
said a word”. But doesn’t Russia have a
say in all of this?
- Don't they have
several hundred foreign owned companies in their country? What would prevent Russia from ‘taking over’
the Russian divisions of: Coke, Pepsi, Exxon, etc. – and kicking out their non-Russian
employees?
- Doesn’t Russia have large
loans with U.S. and E.U. banks? What
would happen if they stopped paying on those loans?
- Doesn’t Russia have
approximately $200B worth of US Treasuries?
What would happen if they dumped them on the world market for pennies on
the dollar?
- Doesn’t Russia
supply an enormous amount of natural gas, coal, iron and other resources to Western
Europe? What would happen if they
‘clamped down’ on those exports? I know
that it isn't the depths of winter right now, but I also don’t suppose that 20
million cold Europeans are going to be happy about shivering through their
March and April evenings.
And consider the ultimate ‘hold card’. What if the sanctions turn into shots being
fired? How quickly would that escalate
into a true war, pushing toward a nuclear exchange? History shows that desperate people do
desperate things. Add-In the ‘water
cooler’ discussions and the simple threat of a nuclear exchange would cause an
economic ripple that simply could NOT be put back together.
Big players with big agendas have caused this mess. The average J.Q. Public is worried about his job, his wages, his insurance, and his immediate future. Honestly, our own backyard is littered with problems, and we don't need to create new ones for the sake of our ‘planners’. But we've gone and done it, and it could have serious consequences.
I admit that there's very little the average person can do. But unless the U.S. and E.U. back away from their rhetoric on sanctions: next week our world enters a white hot, new cold war – and what could go wrong with that?
The Market...
Despite trying to put on a brave face for the world, the U.S. market had a rough go of it last week. It isn't just business as usual when an aircraft disappears into thin air with 230 people on board, where cell phones still worked and engine transponders ‘pinged’ for 7 hours after the last known contact. It isn't every day when two nuclear superpowers are tossing barbed jabs back and forth, while ‘boots on the ground’ build up on borders.
It was however (business as usual) concerning our weekly economic reports:
Big players with big agendas have caused this mess. The average J.Q. Public is worried about his job, his wages, his insurance, and his immediate future. Honestly, our own backyard is littered with problems, and we don't need to create new ones for the sake of our ‘planners’. But we've gone and done it, and it could have serious consequences.
I admit that there's very little the average person can do. But unless the U.S. and E.U. back away from their rhetoric on sanctions: next week our world enters a white hot, new cold war – and what could go wrong with that?
The Market...
Despite trying to put on a brave face for the world, the U.S. market had a rough go of it last week. It isn't just business as usual when an aircraft disappears into thin air with 230 people on board, where cell phones still worked and engine transponders ‘pinged’ for 7 hours after the last known contact. It isn't every day when two nuclear superpowers are tossing barbed jabs back and forth, while ‘boots on the ground’ build up on borders.
It was however (business as usual) concerning our weekly economic reports:
- Mortgage
applications fell another 2%,
- Consumer confidence
fell like a rock, and
- The NFIB small
business optimism report fell almost 3% - from 94.1 to 91.4.
Right now: ‘Return OF Capital’ is trumping ‘Return
ON Capital’. The questions are many:
- If the Ukraine/Crimea/Russian
situation settles down, do we just go back to our ‘ever-levitating’ market?
- Do we finally find
out that the airliner was actually hijacked, and might be (at this moment)
being fitted with bombs to use in a terror attack?
- Do we look forward
to the next Federal Reserve meeting (on Wednesday), and start praying that the
Fed starts talking about halting the taper?
Combine all of this political theatre with next
week’s FOMC meeting and one thing is certain: unless the Fed comes out on
Wednesday and declares that they have suspended their tapering, our
markets have a better chance of going lower than higher over the next week. If the Fed stands firm on their taper and
declares that they would need to see some really dramatic reason to stop, that
will even accelerate the market’s fall. The
Fed blamed the weakness this winter on the bad weather. As the weather improves, and the data does not,
it will be interesting to see the Fed’s next move.
But, if the Fed (on Wednesday) says that the problems in Europe along with the weak data have caused them to decide to slow the taper (or halt it), the market will add 500 points in a few days and ‘to hell’ will the whole Russia/Ukraine thing. The markets will feel that once again (no matter what happens) the Fed's “got our back, damn the torpedoes, and full speed ahead”.
With all these twists and turns in play right now, there's not much you can do in the stock market. I'd love to start leaning short here, but again, one friendly word out of Putin, or one mention that the taper is over, and your shorts would instantly become massive losers. That said, leaning long right this second (with all these plates in the air) sounds more like Las Vegas, and definitely more risk than I would like to take.
For me, the next several days will be: gold, silver and ‘wait and see’.
But, if the Fed (on Wednesday) says that the problems in Europe along with the weak data have caused them to decide to slow the taper (or halt it), the market will add 500 points in a few days and ‘to hell’ will the whole Russia/Ukraine thing. The markets will feel that once again (no matter what happens) the Fed's “got our back, damn the torpedoes, and full speed ahead”.
With all these twists and turns in play right now, there's not much you can do in the stock market. I'd love to start leaning short here, but again, one friendly word out of Putin, or one mention that the taper is over, and your shorts would instantly become massive losers. That said, leaning long right this second (with all these plates in the air) sounds more like Las Vegas, and definitely more risk than I would like to take.
For me, the next several days will be: gold, silver and ‘wait and see’.
Tips:
Allow me end with my position on gold and
silver. Both are up nicely on the year,
and if this political situation does start to spiral, everyone will wish they
had more of the precious metals (including me).
But even if things get ugly over the Ukraine, I tend to think the really
big moves (for the metals) are still in the future. So frankly, I can't see any compelling reason
for Gold or silver to dip back to their lows.
Yes, the ‘banksters’ will try and keep them contained, but I don't think
they can get them down to the December lows any longer. A long slow grind higher seems ‘right’ in my
mind.
A shout-out to R.P. for his article
on gold and silver manipulation:
Manipulation is not a big deal – until it IS a BIG DEAL. It’s not
a big deal until it is discovered, but once it is – then ‘confidence’ will
change overnight. Case in point:
- In
April, China is due to give an updated report on their official holdings of
gold.
- If this
does happen then you can apply simple math to determine: Where did their
reported gold come from?
- If China
were to announce holdings of 5,000 metric tons (or anything close) then it will
be known that this gold came from the U.S. – because there are no other gold
supplies (on the planet) large enough to have supplied this much gold.
- At that
point the price manipulation argument will be put to rest because the ‘reset’
(in effect) will already have occurred.
- After
that point, the ONLY thing that will matter is whether or not you have any
physical metal and how much, period!
- Because
once confidence breaks – it will not be restored except by a currency that has
some sort of real backing. We have
history on our side here.
With that as a backdrop, this week we really got
back into playing our NUGT / DUST combination.
These are two leveraged ETF’s that are focused around the precious metal
(gold and silver) mining industry. The
ETF’s are designed to virtually offset each other – meaning as one goes up the
other goes down virtually the same amount.
Therefore, it’s somewhat of a natural to:
-
Purchase equal
dollar amounts of each ETF,
-
Sell one standard
deviation, out-of-the-money calls on each ETF at between a 1.5 and 2% (weekly) return
rate, and
-
Watch the calls
expire worthless – pocketing their complete sale amounts.
My
current short-term holds are:
-
FEYE – in @ $75.50 – (currently $75.57)
-
USO
(Oil) – in @ $34.51 - (currently $35.77)
-
UCO
(Oil) – in @ $28.75 – (currently $32.66)
-
SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 14.41)
– no stop,
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently
133.00) – no stop ($1,380 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 20.60)
– no stop ($21.45 per physical ounce).
To
follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is:
taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F.
Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any
reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in
complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
