RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, April 9, 2017

This Week in Barrons - 4-9-2017

This Week in Barrons – 4-9-2017:



“It just doesn’t matter” … Bill Murray … Meatballs (movie)


Thoughts:
   Tesla is showing the world that the Barclays SELL rating - “Just doesn’t matter.”  Last week, Barclays put a SELL rating on the stock, with an estimated price target of $165 (roughly half its existing price) – and the stock continued to climb to all-time-highs anyway.  Barclays thinks: “Q1 earnings won’t matter. Model 3 hype is baked in, and the stock could have yet another leg higher.”  After all, year-to-date Tesla shares have gained 40% - compared to gains of 5.4% for the S&P 500 index.  But Barclays really believes: (a) Tesla had a significant cost advantage in battery packs – but that advantage is narrowing quickly.  (b) Tesla had a significant lead in autonomous driving – but the quality of their systems is in question, and they lack industrial testing, rigor, and scale.  (c) Because there is no shortage of electric-vehicle competitors, Tesla’s ramp-up manufacturing inefficiencies along with their huge cash burn rate will prevent them from building upon any lead.  (d) And Barclays believes that Tesla will have a tough time replicating the dealer and repair networks that the other competitors can offer.  In fact, the competition is already offering usage-based plans that Tesla has only begun to talk about. 




   The U.S. retail industry is showing that the entire industry “Just doesn’t matter” by shedding jobs at a recessionary pace (60,000 lost in February and March).  Retail will lose many more jobs as they continue to shrink their physical footprint in response to the consumer shifting away from bricks-n-mortar stores and malls toward e-commerce.  J.C. Penney, Target, Sears, Macy’s, and Ralph Lauren have announced over 3,500 store closures for 2017.  Bankruptcies and liquidations have also picked up, with Payless just announcing a nearly 400 store closure.  Wet Seal, Aeropostale, Sports Authority, and HHGregg are among the many other retailers that have recently either filed for bankruptcy or liquidated.  According to Cowen & Company, the U.S. is will see another 2,000 store closures before the year ends.  “We expect online penetration of apparel to double, yielding closures of 20% more stores, and over 240 entire malls in the US. alone this year.”



   Where millennials are moving “Just doesn’t matter”, because property taxes hold the key to how America is changing.  Younger people are flocking to cities in the Northeast and Midwest - but it’s not enough to offset the exodus of retirees and those in search of lower property taxes.  Americans paid nearly $300B in property taxes in 2016, but as with everything in real estate – it’s all about location.  Property taxes don’t just tell a story about local and regional housing markets - they also show how the country is changing.  Americans are fleeing areas with higher property taxes, making those housing markets and local finances more stagnant.  And even an influx of younger people to those urban areas (like the Northeast and Midwest) isn’t enough to offset the exodus to low-tax areas like the Southeast and West.
   A report out this week from Atom Data illustrates the stark difference between the highest tax burdens and the lowest.  Effective tax rates range from 0.32% in Hawaii to 2.31% in New Jersey.  This means that an average annual 2016 property tax bill in South Carolina of $776 – equates to an ADDITIONAL $8,000 of annual spend just to live in New Jersey.  According to Daren Blomquist, vice president with Atom Data, “States with higher property taxes have also lagged behind others in the housing recovery.  Nationwide home prices have risen about 45% in the past five years, but in high-tax states (like New Jersey) prices have only gained 5%.  Meanwhile, low-tax Arizona has seen prices soar 83% in that time.  Add to the fact that the Northeast and the Rust Belt have built out as much as they can, and are stuck paying municipal legacy costs accumulated over decades – creates a vicious cycle.”
   If we add other countries to the mix, owning a home appears to be more attainable in Mexico and China than in the U.S.  A recent report from HSBC found that over 70% of millennials own homes in China, over 46% in Mexico, and over 41% in France – versus 35% in the U.S., and 28% in Australia.  So, the American Dream could be becoming localized to our lowest property taxed states along with several foreign countries.

The Market:























“Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible”… Albert Einstein

   On Friday, Dr. Ron Paul said: “There’s no way Assad did this.  He’d have to be the single most brain damaged human on earth.”  I’m with Ron Paul on this one.  After all, 10 days ago our administration gave Assad the approval to let the Syrian people decide their own fate.  The Assad military (+ Russia) had been defeating ISIS and the rebels to the point where victory was near.  So, on the eve of all of that, it doesn’t make sense that Assad would use chemical weapons on his own people.  Remember 2013, when everyone claimed Assad gassed his own people?  The UN inspectors eventually admitted that the rebels did that, and that it was made to look like Assad. 
   So, what happens now?  Least not forget, Chinese President Xi was visiting the U.S., and certainly was briefed on what we were going to do.  Did we (the U.S.) set up the false flag chemical attack and the Syrian missile response – to show President Xi and N. Korea that we mean business?
   Speaking of N. Korea, over the past 3 days I have read no less than a dozen articles on why N. Korea wants to attack us by the end of summer.  Then there was NBC news anchor Lester Holt doing his reporting from S. Korea this week.  When Lester was interviewing Thae Yong Ho (one of the highest-ranking N. Korean diplomats before defecting) something caught my eye.  In Thae’s discussions he said: (a) that Kim Jong Un is growing his nuclear miniaturization ability, and (b) that the U.S. had moved their THAAD missile defense system into South Korea.  Those are both big deals.  According to Thae, Kim Jong Un is obsessed with ‘nukes’ because he has seen what has happened to Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Libya's Moammar Gadhafi, both of whom abandoned their country's nuclear weapons of mass destruction programs – and then were overthrown by U.S.-backed forces.  Thae went on to say (and most analysts agree): “Because of that, Kim Jong Un strongly believes that only a nuclear arsenal can guarantee his rule."
   So, Kim is paranoid after watching the U.S., Libya, and Iraq – and figures that the only way to remain in power is to stock-pile nuclear weapons.  In and of itself, that’s not a big deal.  But what has recently changed is that N. Korea has discovered a way to miniaturize a nuclear warhead enough to give their missiles a 2,000-mile range.  This caused Rex Tillerson (U.S. Sec. of State) to say: "I think it's important to recognize that the political and diplomatic efforts of the past 20 years to bring North Korea to the point of denuclearization have failed.  The time for chatting is over."
   On Monday, “The Hill” website displayed an article written by James Woolsey (former CIA Director) and by Dr. Peter Vincent Pry (Executive Director of the EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security) titled: “How North Korea could kill 90% of all Americans.”  It went on to say: “North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un has been photographed posing with what appears to be a genuine miniaturized nuclear warhead for ballistic missiles.  In any case, North Korea could always deliver an atomic bomb hidden on a freighter sailing under a false flag into a U.S. port, or hire their terrorist allies to fly a nuclear 9/11 suicide mission across the unprotected border with Mexico.  In this scenario, populous port cities like New York, New Orleans, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, or big cities nearest the Mexican border, like San Diego, Phoenix, Austin, and Santa Fe, would be most at risk.  And according to the Congressional EMP Commission, a single warhead could blackout the U.S.’s national electric grid and other life-sustaining critical infrastructures for over a year – killing 9 of 10 Americans by starvation and societal collapse.”  http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/defense/326094-how-north-korea-could-kill-up-to-90-percent-of-americans-at-any
   We’ve seen this movie before.  If Kim doesn't back down, and start to dismantle his program – we’re going to go in and shut it down.  Syria was simply the warning to N. Korea.  But there are other anomalies occurring that are reflected in the stock market:
-       Tesla has a larger market cap than both Ford and GM.  Tesla makes less than 1/30th the inventory, bleeds money like a wounded pig (losses of over $1B), and if it were not for Government tax breaks – their buyers would completely disappear.
-       Auto sales for March were well below estimates, with almost 30% of all sales now going to subprime borrowers – where payment delinquencies are already out of control.  Automobile off-lease and used-vehicle prices are expected to fall sharply – as much as 25 to 50 percent according to Ally Financial.  Brad Lamensdorf (co-manager of the AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) said: “The need to move inventory has translated into reckless lending.  It’s not fraudulent, but people are up to their neck in debt.  And coming default rates are going to be much more significant.”
-       Just so we know how criminal things are at the top, FED-head Richard Lacker resigned this week because he ‘inadvertently’ leaked the FOMC’s decision-plans to an analyst.  Not ‘any’ analyst mind you, but to the analyst that is the ONE that tells the ‘Too Big To Fail’ banks what they should be doing.  So, chances are those banks made billions on this information.
-       And this week J.P. Morgan Chase’s (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon told his company’s shareholders: “Something is wrong with America.”  He complained about the debt loads of corporations and individuals, but seemed to omit how these low-interest debt loads are ‘greasing the wheels’ of big banks like JPM.  Naturally Mr. Dimon is NOT going to be pointing a finger at himself, but those fee-heavy, debt-based products that JPM offers are something he could change tomorrow if he wanted to. 

   On Friday, we had the Non-Farm Payrolls report, and it wasn’t pretty.  Estimates were for a rise of 178K jobs, but we only received an increase of 98K – along with an unemployment rate that FELL to 4.5%.  Between that poor jobs number and the mess in the Middle East – we should have been down 500 points on Friday.  But the poor jobs number was explained away by the blizzards in the North East, and the plunge protection team offset the Syrian nightmare and kept markets relatively stable. 
   Politically, even if Assad didn't do it, I think Trump (as long as we don’t do anything else) comes out looking good.  The Russians have already dissolved the agreement they had with the U.S. to not shoot down missiles, planes, and drones over Syria.  Which means if we do another attack, Russia's S400 batteries will shoot the attack down – and then we’re at war with Russia.  But assuming we do nothing else – Sec. Tillerson will meet with Putin next week, and chances are good that tensions will de-escalate.
   That’s a lot of elements that need to mesh perfectly, and the market will take all that into account.  This coming week we also have a ‘pit-bull low’ occurring on Wednesday and Thursday.  Therefore, I’m looking for a downward sloping week in the market indexes.  Right now, the world is in a dangerous place and I’m hoping that we can keep the mistakes to a minimum.


Tips:
   We have seen quite the rally in Gold since the Mid-March 1200 lows.  Recently gold has moved through its 200-day moving average, and into levels not seen since the November election.  Gold needs a close above $1265 to turn the longer-term price trend higher.  Gold will likely see resistance at $1275, which corresponds to congestion back in October.  If we can clear resistance at $1275, then a run to $1320 is not out of the question.  If our economic data continues to come in below expectations, or has any hint of not being ‘stellar’ – you could continue to see a build in gold.  On the downside, $1250 has become support, with $1225 becoming the next level of support beneath that.  Previously I discussed the potential for silver to trade north of $18.50 per ounce.  For now, unless we get a rally above $18.50, I’m looking for silver to trade sideways until breaching that level.  However, I view any weakness in silver as a buying opportunity.  The mid $17.50 range should provide good support – with a close above $18.50 igniting price action to the upside.
   If you believe that marijuana sales are the way to go, the Horizons Medical Marijuana ETF (HHMJ) started trading April 5th on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  This index tracks the average performance of a select group of U.S. and Canadian-based companies that work in the medical marijuana sector including: Aurora Cannabis (ACB), Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), Canopy Growth (CGC), and Insys Therapeutics (INSY).
   This past week, volatility has moved substantially higher from a 12+ to a 14+ indicator on the VIX.  This tells me that risk is imminent.  This increased risk has been caused by two things: (a) missiles being fired over in Syria, and (b) a poor Non-Farm Payrolls report.  With this increased risk, comes the bond market (/ZB) continuing to test the 152 level.  If the bond market continues its rise above 152 – the financials will be forced to turn lower, and that will likely take down the S&Ps along with the rest of the market.
-       The Nasdaq (QQQ) is trading at 131.99, has formidable resistance at 133.12 – and is showing a slightly bullish tendency.
-       The Russell (IWM) is trading at 135.21 (below its 21-day moving average), has resistance at 136.52 – and is showing a neutral to downward bias.
-       The S&P (SPY) is trading at 235.15, has resistance at 236.93 – and is showing a neutral tendency.

In this type of market, selling a Delta 70 PUT and buying a Delta 30 PUT as protection is often the best strategy as you make money even if the market remains sideways.  For example:
-       Ulta Beauty (ULTA) – SELL the April 21, Put Credit Spread -285 / +275,
-       Amazon (AMZN) – SELL the April 21, Put Credit Spread -895 / +890,
-       Microsoft (MSFT) – SELL the April 21, Put Credit Spread -65 / +63. 

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting:

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:

Startup Incinerator = https://youtu.be/ieR6vzCFldI

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson


Sunday, April 2, 2017

This Week in Barrons - 4-2-2017

This Week in Barrons – 4-2-2017:



Hey darling, I’m not going to hurt you.” … Jack Nicholson in The Shining


Thoughts:
   We talked last week about health insurance, and this week I’d like to add a little to that discussion.  According to the International Federation of Health Plans, Americans pay from 2 to 6 TIMES more than the rest of the world for brand name prescription drugs. For example: (a) Gleevec (cancer treatment) is $6,214 (per month/per customer) in the U.S., vs $1,141 in Canada, and $2,697 in England.  (b) Humira (rheumatoid arthritis) is $2,246 in the U.S., vs $881 in Switzerland, and $1,102 in England.  And (c) Cymbalta (depression) is $194 in the U.S., vs $46 in England, and $52 in the Netherlands.
   Why does the U.S. pay more than these other nations?  According to the PhRMA, high drug prices are a reflection of the research and development costs associated with bringing a drug to market.  Dr. Peter Bach, Director of Sloan Kettering's Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, says that pharmaceutical companies charge high prices simply "because they can."  Factually, over half of the scientifically innovative drugs approved in the U.S. since 1998 have resulted from research at universities and biotech firms, and NOT from work done by the large drug companies.  And despite all of the R&D, drug companies still spend 19 TIMES more money on marketing than on R&D.
   It gets worse.  America's largest purchaser of medications Medicare, CANNOT (by law) negotiate pricing with the drug companies.  In 2003, our brilliant politicians passed a law that prohibited Medicare from negotiating with the pharmaceutical companies for lower prices.  This law was no accident.  As Rep. Walter Jones from North Carolina and Dan Burton from Indiana tell it: “The pharmaceutical lobbyists wrote the bill.  The bill was over 1,000 pages.  It got to the members of the House early one morning, and we voted on it by 3 a.m.  We had to vote on it by 3 a.m. because a lot of shenanigans were going on that night, that big pharma didn't want to appear on television the next day.”
   Which brings me to the games big pharma continues to play.  For years, asthmatics could control their asthma with an over the counter spray called Primatene Mist.  Inhalers are a $4B market, and the #1 over the counter medication used to help treat bronchial asthma was Primatene Mist.  One day in December of 2011, Primatene Mist was pulled from the shelves.  Armstrong Pharmaceutical (the manufacturer) said that it was due to global warming.  Don't laugh.  The FDA had issued a ban against every asthma inhaler which contained chloroflouorocarbons.  It just so happened that Primatene Mist was the ONLY medication affected, and it was also the ONLY asthma inhaler that had been approved to be sold without a prescription for under $20.  Primatene Mist was the #1 seller, yet the FDA suddenly banned it because they felt that the mist could somehow eat into the Ozone layer.  It’s ironic that the ONLY other option was to buy a medication that was over $100 with dramatically inferior results.
   We all know the extent to which big pharma has bought and paid for both Congress and the FDA – we shouldn’t feel so bad that many of our current insurance premiums are more than our mortgages.  As SF assures me, that may be changing if I live in Colorado, Kentucky, Missouri, or Ohio.  It seems that the insurance company Anthem is looking to exit a high percentage of the 144 regions in which it currently operates.  Anthem has been single-handedly propping up Obamacare in many states, and its departure would leave many consumers in Colorado, Kentucky, Missouri, and Ohio with ZERO Obamacare available insurance options.  Consumers will (therefore) face fines for failing to buy a product that is no longer available to them.
   With the failure of the Republicans to repeal Obamacare, we are about to witness an amazing shift in coverage from our failing health care system.  When the Republicans were campaigning to repeal Obamacare, we were treated to glowing coverage of how the law has helped pull us out of some sort of medical dark age.   Now that the narrative can include Republican inaction, “Hey darling, I’m not going to hurt you” has an entirely different ring to it.


The Market:


















“Handicapping the downturn”

Factually:
-       The latest Atlanta FED model is telling us that the U.S. economy is on pace to expand at a 0.9% pace this year.  That is DOWN from the 1% rate calculated as recently as March 24th.  The downward revision was caused by the most recent consumer spending numbers which edged up a paltry 0.1% - the smallest increase since August.
-       Wall Street’s fear gauge (the VIX) is on pace to post its second-lowest quarterly average ever at 11.68, which is well under its historic average of 20 – telling us that complacency has indeed infused this rally.
-       Caterpillar (CAT) has announced the closing of its facility near Aurora, Illinois, and the layoff of 800 workers.
-       Losses on auto loans are at an annualized rate of 9.1% - up from 7.9% a year ago, and the worst since January of 2010.  Meanwhile, non-performing sub-prime loans at Ally Financial are still tracking at 11.4%.  Santander Holdings and Capital One both have significant exposure to the sub-prime auto loan market.
-       Salil Mehta, a statistician and former director of analytics for the Treasury Department’s $700B TARP program, said there is a 13% chance of a short-term bear market, or a fall of at least 20% from a recent peak.  He sees a 36% chance of a downturn of at least 10%, and a nearly 75% likelihood of a 5% drop (see table above).

   A 5% drop would effectively wipe out all of this year’s gains for the DOW and S&P, and chop the Nasdaq’s rise in half.  But such a move is not out of the ordinary, and some even view retreats on that order as cathartic.  David Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management said: “The market may be stuck in a rut with an improving global economy creating a floor for stocks, and lofty valuations capping further sharp gains.  The movement that you’ve seen has been based on optimism surrounding Trump.  If Trump is going to struggle and the market has already gone up 12% - the Trump-inspired expectations are going to be called into question, and the market for bonds will be going bid – driving down yields.”
   Vassilis Dagioglu, a portfolio manager at Mellon Capital thinks that: “We will see some pullbacks (5% is likely) but barring some kind of external shock, the odds of a 15% or 20% drop are actually quite low at this point.”  And Wells Fargo’s Manley said: “A lot of folks are thinking about, and even bracing for, a correction. Sometimes, that serves as an antidote against a pullback.  Nerves are a wonderful thing.  The more we worry, the less likely things are to happen.”
   Many of you have written asking my opinion on the metals (gold and silver).  Starting on the first of February, SLV (the ETF for silver) started climbing higher – almost straight up.  Then on March 2nd, at exactly 11:30 EST (when the European markets were closing) – some Central Bankster decided to SELL over $2B paper silver contracts.  So, silver was rising (just as planned), and then came the dump.  Realize this is NOT someone delivering physical ounces by truck for sale, but rather this is some Central Bankster printing up and then tossing shorts onto the futures pit.  This is nothing new.  They did the exact same thing on: October 7th, 2016 with $2.25B, on August 31st, 2016 with $4.7B, on May 16th, 2016 with $2.3B, on April 22nd, 2016 with $2B, etc.   It has taken the month of March for silver to move back up and get close to where it was before they pushed it lower.  If silver can surpass its March highs, then we have a chance for another meaningful move higher in the metal.
   But then you ask: Why won’t they just smash it down again?  They could, but after watching how fast the metals have rebounded, I'm beginning to think that as the Shanghai metals exchange keeps growing – the Central Banksters are losing their ability to keep it down.  It seems the ‘physical demand’ may finally be exceeding any bankster’s ability to print and dump.  The question I’m constantly wrestling with is:  Are the powers that be so strong that gold and silver can never break free?  Or, is the rest of the world tired of our shenanigans and opening their own physical exchanges is finally going to put an end to this nonsense?  It's really hard to fight against Central Banksters that can print a billion or two and toss it in to short the metals.  And honestly – they are NOT going to stop trying.  I think that physical demand will ultimately over run their paper shorting ability.  I'm still looking for almost $3K gold and $75 silver at minimum.  We almost got there in 2011 before the paper shorts regained control.
   As for the markets in general, on February 21st the DOW poked its head above 20,750 and spent the next month using 20,750 as the floor and 21,000 as the ceiling.  We then had that big down day on March 21, and moved the floor down to 20,668.  If this market is going to put in another leg higher, it first needs a few closes above the 20,750 level.  Thus far, it has not been able to do that.
-       On March 23rd, we pushed above that level, but couldn't hold the day – ending at 20,656.
-       On March 28th, we tried again but came up shy – putting in a high of 20,735.
-       On March 30th, they attacked it again, got over it by 3 points – but couldn’t hold and ended the day at 20,728.
-       And on Friday, after a feeble attempt we ended at 20,663. 
  
   DOW 20,750 is now the first level of resistance.  Each day that they can't get up and over it, is a day closer to the idea that we might actually see a market slide – instead of a leg higher.  Yet at the same time we KNOW that the Central Banksters and the PPT (Plunge Protection Team) is defending this market.  The big-name stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google) just seem to move higher no matter what.  Others like Eli Lily, Pfizer, Costco – have done nothing but move sideways for a month.  We’re in a period where even the best charts will fail to break out, because we've run too far too fast.  If we can get over DOW 20,750, then stocks with good chart patterns will rise.  After the next 10-days, we will be in earnings season and that always brings its own set of issues.  I didn't like the late day market fade on Friday.  Watch the levels here as this is a very tired market.  If the DOW can't get up and over 20,750, it might finally take its first real rest in many months.


Tips:



   This quarter saw a strong close for equities, though the case for a pullback can be made from these levels.  This week the S&P refused to pop above resistance – even with the Nasdaq rallying.  With the transportation sector ($DJT) still weak, and the S&Ps now in overbought territory, I expect the S&Ps to try to test the 2325 level (down from their current 2362 position) in the near future. 
   The volatility futures are showing us that something dramatic happened on March 21st.  It was on that day that the volatility futures spiked, and has yet to reset itself.  In fact, we are seeing more volatility over the next 18 days than in the next 46 days – which is abnormal.
   Bonds continue to test the 151 level.  If/when bonds break through that level to the upside, the financials will go lower and so will the markets.  If the bonds continue to meander around 151 or lower, then the markets can remain stable.  In my opinion the Bonds are a ‘coin flip’ away from rocking the market – which could explain the high volatility futures.
   With the up-tick in bonds, the financials (XLF) have moved from the 25.3 level down into the 23 level.  If the bonds break thru 151, look for the financials to head lower and Goldman Sachs (GS) to go down with them.
   To put this in perspective: (a) the DOW has risen over 4,000 points (25%) in 15 months, (b) the S&Ps have moved 29% higher over the past 13 months, and (c) the Nasdaq (QQQ) has moved 35% higher over the past 18 months.  Forgetting about valuation, all of the IPOs that are coming to market, and the sub-prime auto loan disaster – this 30% move (in any direction) is not statistically sustainable.  There is a lot more downside risk out there than upside potential.  

Ideas:
-       If you think a bearish strategy is in order on the Nasdaq (QQQ), then buy the $134 May put and short the $132 May put with 49 days until expiration (DTE).  This is a bearish strategy with a 63% probability of making 50% of the max profit before expiration, and has $0.25 of positive daily theta.
-       If the technology sector (XLK) continues to move higher, then JD, Microsoft (MSFT) and Electronic Arts (EA) are all good thoughts.
-       If bonds retreat and the financial sector (XLF) moves higher, watch PayPal (PYPL) and its April 28 - $43 calls, and watch Visa (V) using the April 21 - $88 calls.
-       If retail continues its upward move (XLY), then Home Depot (HD) is setting up exactly as Amazon just did.  And Amazon looks like it’s on a mission to touch the $919 mark.

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting:

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:

Startup Incinerator = https://youtu.be/ieR6vzCFldI

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <
http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.


R.F. Culbertson