RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, November 6, 2016

This Week in Barrons - 11-6-2016

This Week in Barrons – 11-6-2016:



“Life moves pretty fast.  If you don’t stop and look around once and a while you could miss it.”  Ferris Bueller


Thoughts:
On the eve of potentially one of the most contested, controversial, and eye-opening Presidential campaigns in decades I’d like to say thanks:
-       To Jeff Immelt – GE Chairman and Head of the U.S. Commission on Job Creation, for moving GE’s X-Ray Division from Waukesha, Wisconsin to Beijing, China.  I’m guessing President Obama forgot to tell you to create jobs INSIDE the U.S.
-       To Saudi Arabia – for lowering the price of oil so that the world is swimming in it.  This week the price dropped below $45 per barrel, and some of that could be attributed to Weatherford Oil’s insolvency issue (having $8B debt and only $600m in cash to pay for it), but without real production cuts – prices could soon move to $26 per barrel.
-       To President Obama – for keeping over 5 wars going simultaneously – NONE of them approved by Congress.
-       To Wikileaks for showing that Donna Brazile (on two separate instances) gave Hillary Clinton the debate questions BEFORE the debate.
-       To the FBI agents who (on their own time) found a pattern of pay-to-play bribery concerning the Clinton Foundation that includes the monetizing of political influence, fraud, obstruction of justice, and a possible RICO conspiracy.
-       To Wikileaks for saying that their source for all of their information is NOT Russian hackers, but rather “good-guy insiders” within the U.S. government who wish this information be known.
-       And to Chris Matthews for saying: “Do you like uncontrolled, illegal immigration?  Do you like the string of stupid wars from Iraq to Libya to Syria?  If you said yes to any of that, and if you want to keep it that way – then vote for Hillary Clinton.  If you wake up the day after the election, and it is the same as it is today – remember you had the chance to change it but you were too dainty to do it.”

The experts say that a Trump will win will depend upon:
-       The 'silent majority' of working-class white males showing up to vote,
-       Hillary Clinton bleeding votes to Gary Johnson – especially in Utah,
-       The African-American and Latino voter turnout dropping, and
-       The Northeast coming out in favor of Trump.



I’d like you to consider one thing.  Even though all of the anecdotal evidence suggests a Trump win (Trump-Pence signs on lawns, Trump vs Hillary attendance at rallies, Trump vs Hillary digital footprints, etc.) – let’s assume Hillary steals the election.  Trump will contest it and start bringing up evidence of fraud.  What happens if during that election investigation, the ‘good guys’ at the FBI find a way to get Hillary indicted via the foundation?  What the heck happens then? 

Unfortunately, I don’t think Tuesday ends anything – I think it’s just the beginning.  And I really hope that I am wrong.


The Market...

The question is: What aren’t we going to do?” … Ferris Bueller

Factually this week:
-       We received the results of the FOMC meeting = No rate hike.
-       We broke-down thru DOW 18,000, and landed at 17,814,
-       We broke-down thru S&P 2,100, and landed at 2,082,
-       The PMI fell, the Dallas FED fell, and we had another week of record outflows from mutual funds.
-       We had record low levels of Insider buying, and even a slow-down in stock buyback announcements.
-       Obamacare rates in most states will increase between 25 to 100+%.
-       The strength in the U.S. Dollar will put a lid on earnings, and may slow the FED’s hope for rate increases.
-       Corporations continue to embrace M&A over capital investments.
-       The Non-Farm Payrolls Report showed that we added 161k jobs – BUT:
o   Part time jobs increased 90,000,
o   Full time jobs DECREASED by 103,000,
o   The Birth/Death model created 197,000 fictitious (phantom) jobs
o   The Net Result – we actually LOST 36,000 jobs.

How many ways can you say volatility?  It has been 36 years since we’ve seen the S&P fall for 9 straight days.  Although a 9-day losing streak sounds incredibly bad, we are only off 4.7% from our all-time-high.  July 7th was the last time the S&P closed under 2120, and for almost 4 months the market bounced between 2120 and 2190.  But Friday’s close below 18,000 on the DOW, and 2,100 on the S&P – could get interesting.  But the more intriguing fact is that year-over-year we are now in the RED.



Since the great plunge of 2008, Governments and Central banks round-the-world have gone to incredible lengths to push the equity markets higher.  The U.S. is the strongest horse in the glue factory, and despite all the trillions in stimulus, we're limping along at a 1 - 2% GDP.  Imagine for a minute that the Central Banksters stopped printing, stopped buying stocks, stopped buying corporate debt, and stopped QE.  After all these years, the only thing we would have to show for the trillions in debt is a silly stock market.  No matter who gets into power things are going to change.  By combining the market wanting to go lower with the insanity of the election – we could be looking at the start of something.

So long-term (whether Hillary or Trump win), I believe the market goes lower next year.  In terms of an immediate reaction, the market's initial reaction will be quite different.
-       If Hillary wins, I think we see a major 3 to 5-day rally that pushes us right back up against the all-time highs.  This becomes a ‘blow off top’, and we start a long gradual slide that doesn't end until the markets are down over 40%.  So with Hillary, I think we get an immediate ‘pop’ and then a gradual ‘drop’.
-       If Trump wins, I expect to see a sell off as much as 20% that is both sharp and quick.  Then the normal ‘dead cat bounce’ sets in that lasts for a bit, and then a much slower slide lower.  So with Trump, I look for an immediate sell off, soggy bounce, and then a prolonged downturn.
-       Therefore, I think the short-term play on Monday would be to buy a straddle and take advantage of any large market move higher or lower.

After 7 years of being propped and prodded higher, this bull market has probably run its last range and is in need of a hefty correction – that could last for a long time.  Remember, the market takes the stairs up, but the elevator down.  In other words, crashes and corrections are normally fast and hard.  I would ask your financial advisor about buying protection (potentially via puts) in case this market does finally correct.

This should prove to be quite an exciting week.  I hope you have enough popcorn. 


Tips:
An investing roadmap for:
-       A Hillary win:
o   Banks would move higher for a while: GS, JPM, MS, BAC, and C.  You could play this using the financial ETF = XLF, or the 2x financial ETF = UYG. 
o   Foreign banks should move higher as well: DB, BCS, CS and RBS.
o   Aero and defense stocks will benefit: GD, RTN, NOC, and LMT.  You could play using the aerospace/defense ETF’s = XAR and ITA.
o   Hillary doesn’t like the prices in healthcare or bio-tech so watch for those to be under pressure.
-       A Trump win:
o   Coal will move higher and the easiest play is the coal ETF = KOL.
o   He wants us to be energy self-sufficient and will push for more oil and gas drilling.  Look toward some offshore drillers like RIG and DO.  He will try and put the frackers back to work, so look for him to sell natural gas around the world with UNG.
-       For playing the ‘short side’ of the market (i.e. making money when the market is going lower) consider some ‘Inverse ETFs’ such as:
o   SEF, UYG, or FAZ in the financials,
o   To short the DOW use DOG, 2x = DXD,
o   To short the S&P use SH, 2x = SDS, and
o   To short the Russell 2K use RWM.
-       I suspect major volatility is heading our way, and having some exposure to it makes sense.  Look at buying some VIX and some VXX – to play increases in market volatility.  Remember there are no cash values to these indexes, but rather they are based upon the number of calls versus number of put options – and can get pretty wild at times.
-       And of course you could simply buy put options on the SPY, DIA, XLF, and IWM.

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0


To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson



Sunday, October 30, 2016

This Week in Barrons - 10-30-2016

This Week in Barrons – 10-30-2016:

 “Children taste color, hear shapes, and see sounds” … Picasso

When I think of Halloween, I think of a simple idea that hasn’t changed a whole lot, and yet has stood the test of time.  Unfortunately, there are very few of those ideas.  Immigration (for example), the U.S. policy has remained static since 1990, and before SF sent me the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE I would have thought that: (a) our immigration policy mattered to the world, and (b) we were a part of the solution.  On both counts I would have been wrong.
-       Since 1990 the U.S. has taken in 1m immigrants per year, and that’s virtually our social and infrastructure limit.  The World Bank tells us that there are 5.6B people living in poverty around the globe: (Africa - 650m, India - 890m, Asia - 1.3B, and Latin America -  105m) and our 1m immigrants do NOT even make a dent in that total.
-       Therefore, when people wish to double the number of immigrants that the U.S. takes in (irrespective of the devastating effect it will have on our own unemployed, the working poor, and our natural resources) – I wonder if they’ve run the numbers.
-       Seldom have I heard the stance that our immigration policies may be doing more harm than good.  That in fact the immigrants that we accept are among the most energetic, well-educated, and dissatisfied people in their particular countries.  IF they did not immigrate, THEY would be the ‘agents for change’ within their own country.
-       So not only can’t we take enough people to make a difference, but the people we take are the very ones that would be the catalyst for changing their own cultures.  After all, the true heroes are the ones that STAY in their own country and apply their skills to help their fellow countrymen.
-       Numerically, our immigration policy is working even worse than the odds suggest.  While the U.S. was taking in its 1m immigrants, the rest of the world was adding 80m to their own poverty numbers every year.
-       Immigration is NOT the answer.  The ONLY place where 99.9% of the impoverished people of the world can be helped – is where they live!  I encourage you to watch this video done so uniquely by an economist who uses ‘gumballs’ to represent those in poverty, and explains (in very basic terms) why the US policy is flawed and why it only exacerbates the issue:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE.



           My second misconception was that China has more poor people than the U.S. and Europe.  This week CW sent me the Credit Suisse Annual Global Wealth Report where it showed that as a percentage of the world's population, there are now more poor people in the United States and Europe than there are in China.  Almost 25% of Americans have a negative net worth.  The reason for that is that the U.S. makes it so easy to go into debt.  (a) You can borrow tens of thousands of dollars for a college degree without ever having to show the ability to pay it back.  (b) We encourage people to buy homes by making home mortgage interest deductible on our tax returns.  (c) The FED has kept interest rates at zero, making it more attractive to borrow than to save.  And (d) our government leads by example – with a net worth of NEGATIVE $60T.          
As our government continues to modify the definitions of inflation, GDP and unemployment to suit the political landscape, those same definitions are coming home to roost.  We have over 90m U.S. citizens not participating in the workforce (www.bls.gov).  That means over 37% of our working aged labor force is NOT working at all.  Of those 90m, over 43m of them are receiving food stamps worth over $5B per month.  Obamacare costs have just started to skyrocket with national premiums increasing 25%, and regional ones around Philadelphia rising 56%.  As the Obamacare patient population continues to skew toward the unemployed and older, and as fewer and fewer ‘healthy people’ actually pay into it – its prices will continue to rise.  Eventually the ‘takers’ will outnumber the ‘givers’ and the system will fail.
Anymore, I’m amazed how complex and convoluted we can make a very simple idea, and I admire the ones that have remained pure throughout the years.  Picasso once said: “It took me 4 years to paint like Raphael – but a lifetime to paint like a child.”


The Market: 
Factually:
-       Paccar, Volvo, and Daimler trucks all saw their profits and revenues decline in the third quarter of 2016.
-       Mortgage applications and business investment fell in Q3.
-       Italy’s oldest bank ‘Monte dei Paschi di Siena’ announced that it will cut 2,600 jobs, close 500 branches, sell off its bad loans, and raise capital in the latest bid to secure its survival.
-       OTTO / UBER made its first autonomous driving delivery = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb0Kzb3haK8 
-       Freight rail car orders fell to their lowest level in 6 years, meaning that there is no growth in shipping.
-       NATO recently announced plans for its biggest military build-up on Russia's borders since the Cold War.
-       Reuters reported that U.S. mutual funds had their largest outflow in five years.  $16.9B was pulled from stock mutual funds in the seven days through Oct. 19, more than in any other week since August 2011.
-       The first look at 3rd quarter GDP came in at 2.9%.  That's amazing considering the 2nd Q was just 1.4%.  The annualized rate is still under 2%.

This week Deutsche Bank attempted to calculate how much of the S&P’s run up was due too Central Bankster behavior.  After all, earnings have gone nowhere over the past two years, and on a GAAP basis they are the lowest since 2010.



This means that earnings growth has NOT been a factor behind the stock market's ascent to all-time highs.  After all, there are three components of a stock’s price: (a) earnings growth, (b) a stock’s sector multiplier, and (c) the ‘equity risk premium’ – as people view stocks as being less and less risky they drive the price higher.  DB said that the FED is worried that once rates go up (as a result of renormalization) and due to the lack of a central bank intervention, stocks will crash.  As it turns out the following chart shows that the FED has ample reason to be worried.  After all the bulk of the equity performance between 2012 and 2016 is captured inside the ‘equity risk premium’.



This also means that every push higher in yield, whether orchestrated by our Central Banksters, or due to events like a ‘The Donald Becoming President’ risks upsetting the precariously compressed equity risk premium (ERP) spring – leading to a violent market crash.  IF the ERP is responsible for 92% (800+ points) of the S&P500 move since 2012, that would suggest that our FED is directly responsible for approximately HALF the value of the stock market, and any moves to undo this support could result in crash that lands the S&P around 1,400.
           
In terms of trading next week leading up to the election, I’m looking for the same S&P chop that we’ve experienced for the past 5 months.  I expect the S&P to remain between 2120 and 2070 for the week, and drift slightly higher in anticipation of a Clinton presidency.


Tips:
At 1pm on Friday, the FBI announced that they were looking into more Emails concerning Hillary Clinton.  The market instantly went from up 74 to down 50.  The Democrats started asking how the FBI could be so insensitive as to open an investigation with just 11 days left to the election.  The Republicans started proclaiming that just maybe the rule of law in the U.S. could be saved.
Theories abound concerning what they have and why they did this: (a) The ‘powers that be’ see the early voting results, realize that Trump is going to pull this off, and want to save their necks. (b) FBI insiders were going to spill the beans on what they know, as many field officers felt betrayed by Dir. Comey. (c) Dir. Comey knows that WikiLeaks is going to release information this week that ties ALL of the top politicians into the corruption, and wants to get ahead of it. (d) FBI agents (NOT throttled about investigating Hillary) were working on Weiner/Huma emails, and found so much stuff they were going to come forward.  You can pick your favorite, but what we know thus far is that the FBI found thousands of State Department-related emails (ostensibly containing classified information) on the electronic devices belonging to Mr. Anthony Weiner and his wife (top Clinton aide) Ms. Huma Abedin.  The discovery has prompted FBI Director James Comey to (on the eve of the election) reopen the Clinton e-mail case. 
I don't know how this all works out.  My questions start with: (a) Is this the first election where one of the candidates is possibly under investigation for criminal activity?  (b) If more bombshells hit, will the DNC yank Hillary and replace her with Bernie or Joe?  (c) Could Obama use executive order to delay the election and give the DNC time to form a replacement?
My gut tells me that this is showmanship.  All the stuff they had originally was MORE than enough to disqualify her from ever having confidential clearance, and the FBI and the Justice System did nothing.  I think the FBI field officers felt betrayed.  I think that as more and more Podesta e-mails are made public, they had to do something to make it look like they're not bought off shills.  If this investigation continues, Hillary could be the first Presidential candidate that on election day is being investigated by the FBI for a Federal crime.

            I’m watching:
-       NFLX (Netflix)           – selling Call Credit Spreads around $130,
-       GOOGL (Google)     – selling Put Credit Spreads around $820,
-       AMZN (Amazon)      – selling Call Credit Spreads around $770,
-       FB (Facebook)         – buying Call Debit Spreads for earnings run,
-       FFIV                            – buying Call Debit Spreads – moving higher,
-       GS (Goldman)          – buying Call Debit Spreads – moving higher w/ rates,
-       OIL                              – looking to hold the 47 to 48 level then move higher, 
-       The Bank of Japan and Bank of England both have interest rate decisions next week – and a hint at more QE will drive the dollar and gold higher.
-       If Donald Trump wins the Presidency – watch for gold to spike higher over-night.

To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there!

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

Please write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is the handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0


To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://
rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/> 
Until next week – be safe.

 
R.F. Culbertson