This Week in Barrons – 5-1-2016:
Ready to take a Leap of
Faith?
Thoughts:
On
Friday the stock market reminded me of what it must be like to jump out of a
helicopter. In an instant, the Nasdaq took a 90-point swan dive, and broke
through technical support. I could talk
about the corresponding wild swings in the S&P and in popular tech stocks,
but right now – currencies are driving this market. Early Friday morning, the Bank of Japan (BOJ)
blindsided traders by making an unexpected announcement that caused the Nikkei
to plunge over 1,000 points in a minute.
Because the Japanese economy is failing so badly, everyone expected the
BOJ to take SOME monetary action (which translates to ‘give out more free
money’). Instead, the BOJ boldly
declared that they would be doing NOTHING.
Boom – ‘drop the mic’ – ‘walk off
the stage’. The shockwaves were immediate.
The Japanese market puked, the Yen surged higher, Gold took off like a
rocket, the U.S. Dollar fell, and global markets instantly went red.
This
decision was so unexpected, that the BOJ followed their announcement with another
announcement confirming that yes – they had decided to take no action. What’s going on you asked? Hint: Central Bank shenanigans.
The
U.S. FED is the 800-pound gorilla of the markets. Less obvious (but just
as true) is that the strong dollar has hampered our domestic and global
economy. For proof, you need look no
further than the collapse in oil prices and the decline in the financial sector. Our FED cannot afford to let our dollar
and/or the economy slip any further – potentially into a recession. After all, Ms. Yellen already had her
knuckles rapped for raising interest rates this close to a Presidential
election. It’s no secret that the U.S. economy is teetering on the edge
of recession, and reports of 0.5% economic growth aren’t fooling anyone. To save the U.S. and global economies, the U.S.
dollar MUST go down, and that means – on Friday the BOJ’s hands were tied.
The irony in all of this is that stocks dropped like a rock on Friday – because Japan did NOT destroy itself (more than it already has) by issuing more ‘free money’. We now know why Ms. Yellen was so completely dovish in her remarks on Wednesday. She knew that it was the BOJ’s turn to ‘manage the markets’ by talking tough. The pattern that is developing across the big 3 Central Banks is that they regularly exchange the ‘talking tough baton’ between Ms. Yellen, Mr. Draghi of the ECU, and Mr. Kuroda of Japan. Last month Mr. Draghi disappointed his constituents by not unleashing more ‘bazooka dollars’. Last week, Japan’s Mr. Kuroda took control of the ‘disappointment baton’. Next time, if global markets are running wild, don’t be surprised if Ms. Yellen is the ‘bad guy’ and disappoints. And if global markets are falling in unison, don’t be surprised if it’s Ms. Yellen’s turn to say something bullish. It’s all just a game.
With Japan in
particular, their financial system has become so perverted that the Bank of
Japan (BOJ) is now a top-10-holder of 90% of Japanese stocks. So even though they did not unleash any more
QE, they are actively propping up their market by buying virtually all of the stocks
– using an unlimited amount of money that they can create ‘out of thin air’.
The latest rumor out of
our own FED is concerning ‘Helicopter Money’.
This is where the FED would write a huge check to the U.S. Treasury
office, which would then send a tax rebate (cash) to millions of Americans. The thinking and hope behind such an action
is that Americans would then actively spend that money and more. After all, consumer spending makes up the
majority of economic activity so more spending would boost our country's growth
prospects – which are currently dim. No
one expects the FED to announce a helicopter money program next week, but the mere
talk of ‘Helicopter Money’ illustrates how desperate central bankers are to
spark growth.
The
Market:
Factually:
- Caterpillar
(CAT) announced that they are closing 5 more plants
and laying-off 900 more workers – the day after a TV interview where their CEO declared
that their lay-offs were over.
- Oil is still in trouble as Freeport fires 25% of its oil and gas
workers.
- OPEC is set to pump even more oil in April, as Saudi Arabia boosts
exports to near-record high levels and Iran plans to double production. Could it be that ‘someone’ is manipulating
oil prices higher so that all of those bankrupt oil and energy companies can
stay alive, sell more debt and try and pay back some of the banker loans that
are in danger of defaulting?
-
Per SF, mortgage
applications fell by 4% last week. Homeownership
in the United States is near its lowest point in history (63.6%) – just one-tenth of 1 basis point higher than its
all-time low. Homeownership hit a
high of 69.4% in 2004, when mortgage lending was at its loosest level in
history.
- Core durable goods orders tumbled for the 14th month – creating the
longest non-recessionary stretch in 60 years.
- Apple (AAPL) missed earnings estimates last week – with revenues down
13%. It was the first revenue decline in
‘forever’ for Apple. Maybe people just
didn't have the money to buy more ‘stuff’?
- Hess (oil company), Buffalo Wild Wings, Boeing, and Baker Hughes were
just a few of the many companies that also missed earnings and/or revenue
estimates last week.
So, with all of the
earnings misses, the housing market cooling, and gas prices moving higher – How’s
the future looking? The issue is that the banksters have painted
themselves into the worst corner of all time. They are keeping the markets at nosebleed
levels, bragging about a 5% unemployment rate, and talking about the ongoing
‘recovery’ as if it were real. But they
know that the economy is a mess, GDP is hovering near 0, this earnings season
is a disaster, and the entire globe is in a soft recession. You can't have it both ways.
On Friday, the ‘Plunge Patrol Team’ stepped in and halted the slide in the S&P at 2050 and drove it back up to end the day at 2065. They will defend the 2050 level on the S&P with every gold plated kitchen sink they can find. However, with money still fleeing the market – internal market indicators are rolling over. This week you can bet that Central Banks will be actively in the market trying to prevent the old adage: “Sell in May and Go Away". [Referring to banksters packing up and moving to the Hamptons for the summer.] Central Banks will not want that to happen, and they will rely on the corporate buy back embargo ending to help their case.
On Friday, the ‘Plunge Patrol Team’ stepped in and halted the slide in the S&P at 2050 and drove it back up to end the day at 2065. They will defend the 2050 level on the S&P with every gold plated kitchen sink they can find. However, with money still fleeing the market – internal market indicators are rolling over. This week you can bet that Central Banks will be actively in the market trying to prevent the old adage: “Sell in May and Go Away". [Referring to banksters packing up and moving to the Hamptons for the summer.] Central Banks will not want that to happen, and they will rely on the corporate buy back embargo ending to help their case.
You
see, most companies have not been able to buy back their own stock because there
is a black out period around earnings season that forbids it. That black out period will end for most
corporations around May 4th. As a
result, we are going to see spectacular buy backs occur, as companies have sold
tremendous amounts of debt in order to raise cash to do so. Volatility is going to increase to wicked
levels – so please be careful out there.
TIPS:
Silver. Is there another commodity on Earth where
demand is so high that the mint runs out – yet the price falls? No. [The
Mint is legally bound to produce all the silver coins that the public demands.]
And this is NOT just a U.S. centric
situation. That is why I think digital
entries in a computer are not real money. Money should not appear or disappear with the ‘flick
of a switch’. Gold has been the world’s
money for thousands of years. I believe
that the world will revert back to some form of loose gold standard. Gold is going to go higher. Many people think that it’s going to $10,000
per ounce, however my target is $3,000.
It’s presently trading around $1,290.
A couple ways to play it
include:
-
Buy GDX = an ETF
of the ‘bigger’ miners.
-
Buy GDXJ = an
ETF of the ‘junior’ miners.
-
Buy SGDM = the
Sprott Zacks Gold Miners Index which is a rules-based index that seeks to identify about 25 gold stocks with the
highest historical beta to gold price ratio.
-
And/or buy some individual miners such as: NEM, ABX, GFI, GG, PAAS, AG,
AUY, RGLD, FNV, IAG, EGO, HL, MUX, BVN.
All of the above choices should
grow considerably higher over the coming years.
For example on Feb 16th:
-
GDX was $16, and
closed Friday at $25 for a 56% gain.
-
GDXJ was $22,
and closed Friday at $38 for a 72% gain.
-
SGDM was $16,
and closed Friday at $23 for a 43% gain.
-
And NEM was $24,
and closed Friday at $35 for a 46% gain.
In the long run I'd rather
have 10 silver eagles in my hand, than 500 digital dollars in some bank that
now considers my deposit to be ‘an unsecured loan to the institution’. I
worry about digital dollars that (at the flick of a switch) can: ‘No Longer Exist’.
I am:
-
Long various
mining stocks: AG, AUY, DRD, EGO, FFMGF, FSM, GFI, IAG, KGC, and PAAS,
-
Long an oil
supplier: REN @ $0.56,
-
Sold NDX – May –
Iron Condor – 4125 / 4150 to 4750 / 4775,
-
Sold RGR – May –
Put Credit Spread – 55 / 60,
-
Long RUT – May –
Butterfly – 1000 / 1080 / 1130,
-
Long TLT – May –
Call Debit Spread – 128 / 133,
To follow me on Twitter.com and on StockTwits.com to get my daily thoughts
and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within
the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of
noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F. Culbertson, contributing sources
and those he interviews. You
can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please write to Mr. Culbertson at:
<rfc@culbertsons.com>
to inform him of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
<rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If you'd like to view RF's actual
stock trades - and see more of his thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a
Twitter follower - "taylorpamm"
is the handle.
If you'd like to see RF in action -
teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he
gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To unsubscribe please refer to the
bottom of the email.
Views expressed are provided for
information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer,
an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of,
or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations. Mr. Culbertson and related parties are
not registered and licensed brokers. This
message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is
intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute
an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice
can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering
document. Past performance
is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important
disclosures at the end of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not
an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF
Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF
FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN
INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING
HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT
SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT
LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS,
OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT
TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative investment performance
can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or
her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have
total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single
advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of
diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary
market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is
expected to develop.
All material presented herein is believed
to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in
these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may
or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>