This
Week in Barrons – 7-13-2014
Don't Blink!
Things are moving at an incredible speed,
and you can almost ‘feel’ that something big is coming. Some of the ideas that we have been kicking
around are maturing much faster than anticipated. Six months ago I could count on one hand the
number of people talking about the world abandoning the U.S. dollar. Now – not only is it being talked about, but the
rate of abandonment is astonishing. The
question now is: How many of our major global events are a result of the U.S.
losing its global reserve currency status?
Could the wars, rumors of wars, currency issues, lies, and manipulations
all be because the U.S. is engaged in ‘fighting back’ against those who wish to
remove her as the ‘king dollar’? I believe that this is exactly what is
happening.
This week Russian President Putin
blasted the ‘West’ for giving Russia ‘no choice’ but to annex Crimea – because NATO
was soon to move forces into Sevastopol, and change the landscape of power in
the region. He went on to say that:
-
The Ukraine
‘mess’ is the result of the West's policy of constantly trying to deter Russia.
-
The U.S.
fines – levied against the giant French bank PNB (and therefore the French
Government) were outright BLACKMAIL, and in retaliation for the French building
the Mistral class war ships that Russia had ordered.
-
And
ended with: "The
time of U.S. world domination has ended, and Russia will be reintegrating the
Eurasian landmass [former USSR], while promoting better relations with Europe,
which is our natural partner."
So Putin has come out publically
saying that he’s had it with the U.S., and ready to “reintegrate the Eurasian
landmass". But ask yourself: Why
did the U.S. (who tells everyone they're all about peace) decide it had to circle
Russia with missiles?
Add to Putin’s lashing out:
-
France's
PNB facing $9 Billion in fines from the U.S.
-
Austria's
largest bank announcing that their bad loan portfolio has risen over 40% this
year.
-
Portugal’s
largest publicly traded bank missing some large interest payments, causing that
stock to be halted and bringing into question the notion of any real recovery
in the ‘Club Med’ countries.
-
And not
to be outdone, Argentina (having missed a June 30th payment
deadline) is now in a 30-day grace period where they need to come up with a
$500 Million interest payment or they are legally in default (bankrupt).
So Putin is lashing out, 2 national
banks are in the toilet, 1 country is ready to default – what else could one
week bring us? Glad you asked. The French have signed a Franc to Yuan
currency swap with China – with the head of the French Central bank declaring
that the “world would be encouraged to diversity away from the U.S.
dollar.” South Korea also joined in a
currency swap with China – allowing all 3 countries to avoid purchasing oil in
U.S. dollars.
The U.S. cannot afford to lose
Global Reserve Status, but it is being forced upon us. But who (or what) will we blame for this –
when it all comes apart? Remember, the Federal
Reserve is NOT a government owned facility, but rather a private banking
cartel. These Central Banksters are
NOT going to want to take the blame when we lose our status and the dollar
becomes devalued. They've seen vivid
pictures of masses with pitchforks when they’ve done that to other nations. The Central Banksters need to blame someone,
and it’s my guess that a lot of what we see cropping up around the world is as
a result of the Central Banksters looking for ‘bad guys’ to blame.
Factually: if you go to the International
Monetary Fund’s (IMF) web site, you will find a 10-year plan introducing SDR’s
(Special Drawing Rights) as the new global trading currency. Officials at the World Bank, the Bank of
International Settlements (BIS), and the IMF have suggested that the U.S.
dollar domination has run its course. Currently China, Russia, India, Brazil, South
Korea, France, England, and a dozen other countries are set up to trade
bi-laterally using NO U.S. dollars. The
day the entire world will effectively trade for oil in something other than the
U.S. dollar is coming more rapidly than even I would have imagined.
Also, this week the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) finalized rules that would allow money market funds to
‘halt redemptions’ during times of stress. That’s what I would call a ‘Bail In’. So, if the economic system goes bump in the
night, and you just happen to have $20k in a money market fund – they now have
the right to deny you access to your money if they determine that it is ‘disruptive
to the system’.
A year ago I remember making the
statement: “If the Fed really does remove the stimulus – in the face of lousy
economic numbers – then something major has changed". On Wednesday we learned that the Fed is
on-track to end QE by October 2014.
Don’t look now, but our Fed is quietly making moves that are normally
associated with a rising interest rate environment – which puts our ailing
economy on a definite timeline for a reset.
As if to add insult to injury, on Thursday we learned that our Fed is pondering
an overhaul of the method used to measure the Fed Funds Rate. The Fed Funds Rate is a benchmark that
underscores virtually every global financial transaction. The interesting part of the report is that
they’re now willing to consider including Eurodollar transactions. This addition would have a real substantive
effect in a rising interest rate environment. So if the Fed is TRULY resetting the Fed Funds
Rate methodology and including Eurodollar transactions – then (fair warning) an
interest rate increase could be closer than we think.
Coincident with that, the BIS (Bank
of International Settlements) in it’s annual report said: “Bringing forward the
downside leg of a cycle should be considered better than letting the cycle get
too big and causing more destruction in the future." Basically they
said that it’s best to pop the ‘bubbles’ now, rather than let them get even
bigger and be forced to deal with the aftermath.
Boiling this all down:
-
I think
the Fed has been instructed to pull the plug on the US stock market, but needs
a ‘cover / fall guy’ to do it.
-
Therefore,
the Fed is causing a lot of issues around the globe in order to see what will
‘bubble up’ and who they can blame.
Our Fed still needs an escape route for
ruining our currency, turning the world against dollars, and inflating multiple
bubbles. It needs a ‘bad guy’ to blame for
our ills, and is desperately poking all the sleeping dogs to see who bites
back. Our Fed will NOT take the blame
for the U.S. losing reserve status, and crashing the market bubble. They will find their scapegoats – just don’t
blink.
The market...
It's been a choppy week. 3 out of the 5 days were red, and one of the
green days was a ‘save’ – as the market was red all day on Friday until the
last hour when they took it to green for the close. I thought that this
week would include some ‘backing and filling’ of the previous week’s gains, but
you could almost sense a change in atmosphere and attitude. While it is
evident that someone still wants to drive the market higher (as evidenced by
the tremendous amount of S&P e-mini's bought near the close on Thursday)
the statistics show us that more people wanted OUT than wanted IN the market.
-
On
several days this week the negative to positive pressure was more than 3 to 1
to the downside.
-
The volumes,
which have been horrid for many months, are even worse now.
-
It
feels as if there aren't too many participants left who feel there's any real
good reason to stay fully invested.
Because every single dip for the
past couple YEARS has been a buying opportunity, to suggest that this time it’s
different is almost suicidal. Going
against this market has been a lesson in frustration. It is indeed hurtful when everything you have
ever learned points to a market rolling over, but instead it simply soars to
new, all-time highs. So it is with great
caution that I suggest that maybe we haven't seen the end of the selling.
Ms. Yellen told us that they're
going to halt the QE by October. In the
same breath she also told us that they have other tools in their kit that will
continue to keep interest rates low. The
truth is – I would suggest that we all keep a close eye on the ‘interest rate’
exit doors.
This week we're going to hear from
several HUNDRED companies as they release their earnings; therefore, expect
some jolts, bumps and bruises for (at least) the next week or two. Earnings season is a ‘swing traders’ dream, but
there’s no shame in sitting on your hands during a rocky period such as
this. While Friday's green close could
signal the beginning of a push higher, it felt slightly strained and contrived.
So be careful out there this week.
Allow me to end with a submission from S.F.: "The Budget should be balanced,
the Treasury should be refilled, Public Debt should be reduced, the Arrogance
of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the Assistance to foreign
lands should be curtailed, lest Rome will become Bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of
living on public assistance." - Cicero, 55 BC. So,
evidently we haven't learned a damned thing over the past 2,069 years.
Tips:
This past week started out with us recording all of
our daily trades in Twitter and in StockTwits after the market closed – but
Thursday and Friday were just too busy.
Apologies, and I will do better this coming week.
For this coming week – let’s discuss ‘Pinning.’ The phenomenon of a stock ‘pinning/closing’ at
a specific price – that ‘just happens’ to be a particular options expiration
‘strike price’ is a frequently witnessed occurrence. Some have waived the
conspiracy flag. It is (in a sense) a ‘market manipulation’ technique, but
it’s not as nefarious as you might think. Pinning is the result of the ‘market
makers’ hedging their portfolios to keep their portfolios neutral. You see, when you buy a call option, often there
is not one just sitting there ready to buy, but rather the market maker for
that stock must create a particular call option to sell to you. That’s the
job of the market maker. They will (in essence)
take the other side of your trade. The
market maker does not want to have the risk associated with your specific call
(with nothing to back it up), so they will (as a hedge) create another trading
position to back them up – and often these other trading positions aggregate
around a particular group of option’s strike prices.
As options expiration
approaches, the most important thing for the market maker is to keep their
position neutral. But, as options expiration nears – small changes in the
stock can result in major portfolio changes.
As the stock rises, the market maker’s portfolio will become more
positive. By buying and selling stock (to become ‘more’ and ‘less’
positive), the market maker is trying to protect the particular set of option
prices that they chose above – and to above all else – remain neutral. However, the result is the same – and that is
that the stock price naturally navigates to a common strike that all market
makers agree to – and the corresponding stock ‘PINS’ at that price. So, if you listen to a market maker tell the
story, they are just managing their risk – but to rest of the world it looks
like manipulation. The fact remains that
pinning is very real and does occur.
Below is an options
chain on Apple (AAPL) for this coming Friday July 18th. As you can see, the price that market makers
would ‘overwhelmingly’ like Apple to reach (186,749 call options & 99,723
put options) on Friday is $100 per share.
Using this as one of your strategies for monthly expiration is not a bad
idea.
To take advantage of this – with Apple currently
trading at $95.22, you could: (a) purchase the stock, (b) purchase the monthly $94.29
or $95 call options, or (c) (the solution that I prefer) is to purchase the July
25th $94.29 calls and sell the corresponding $100 or $102.14 call options
(in order to reduce the premium that you’ll pay for the $94.29 calls directly)
– often called a Call Debit Spread (CDS).
Good luck as Apple plays out this week – before our very eyes.
It was an interesting week last week. We had some large winners (where we stayed
within ourselves) with the Put Credit Spreads, and a couple losers (NFLX and
FEYE) where we got a little too far ‘out over our skis’.
This week is monthly options expiration, and
normally stocks trade sideways to UP on this type of week. Therefore, I’m again looking to sell premium
on Put Credit Spreads, along with a ‘Pinning’ play on AAPL, and some
interesting earnings plays. I’m still
holding:
-
AAPL – Bought:
October $85, and July 25th - $92.86, $93.57, and $94.29 Calls / Sold
the $100.00 and $102.14 Calls to reduce the premium,
-
AMZN – Sold the
July, $315 / $310 Put Credit Spread (PCS),
-
BITA – Bought the
August, $45 Calls,
-
BWLD – Sold the
July, $150 / $145 PCS,
-
COST
– Bought the August, $115 Calls, and the October, $125 Calls
-
FEYE
– Have stock, Sold: July $31 / $29 PCS, ad the $36 CC’s (Cov. Calls),
-
GOOGL
– Sold the July, $150 / $140 PCS,
-
LNG
– Have stock
-
MNKD
– Have stock, Sold the July $9 / $8 PCS, and the $10.50 / $11.50 CCS,
-
KO
– Bought: November $39, $40, $44, and $45 Calls
-
NUGT
– Have stock, Sold the July $46 / $44 PCS, and the $55 / $57 CCS
-
SHPG
– Sold the July Monthly $205 / $200 PCS, and the $265 / $270 CCS
-
USO
– Bought the January 2015 $41 Calls
-
VIPS
– Sold the July Monthly $170 / $165 PCS
-
WWAV
– Bought: October $30 & $37.5 Calls
Reviewing our Past Week’s Performance:
-
Mannkind
Pharmaceutical (MNKD) – just filed a document with the SEC asking for approval
of a merger / partnership arrangement – so watch for that stock to move a
little on Monday – and then 4 to 6 weeks down the road.
-
FireEye (FEYE) – corrected
this past week – loosing 15% of its value.
We continue to sell both PDS’s and CDS’s – but our stop loss is in the
$33 area.
-
Apple (AAPL) –
closed at $95.22 on Friday – with tremendous open interest at $100 for this coming
Friday, July 18th. We’re
playing Apple very directionally (higher) – but still selling premium where we
can.
-
Cheniere Energy
(LNG) – took a slight pause to catch up to it’s own 8 EMA (exponentially moving
average). We continue to marvel at how
easy this stock is to manage.
-
My energy portfolio
(comprised mostly of small energy companies) continues to perform nicely, but
we are thinning the heard – taking profits and letting our larger winners run
(see below):
My
current short-term holds (returning
> 15.7% for June) are:
-
AAPL
(Tech) – in @ $92.86 – (currently $95.22), 3%
increase / 0.25 mo.
-
COST (Retail) – in @ $115.12 – (currently
$118.01) 3% increase / 0.25 mo.
-
DRTX
(Drug) – in @ $13.61 – (currently $16.68), 23%
increase / 2.25 mo.
o
(Put
Credit and Call Credit Spread Premiums not calculated into results)
-
FEYE (Tech) – in @ $28.05 – (currently $33.62),
20% increase / 2.25 mo.
o
(Put
Credit and Call Credit Spread Premiums not calculated into results)
-
LNG
(Energy) – in @ $57.40 – (currently $71.12), 24%
increase / 1.75 mo.
o
(Put
Credit and Call Credit Spread Premiums not calculated into results)
-
MNKD
(Drug) – in @ $6.35 – (currently $10.07), 59%
increase / 2.5 mo.
o
(Put
Credit and Call Credit Spread Premiums not calculated into results)
- NUGT (Gold) – in @ $46.10 –
(currently $50.75), 10% increase /
0.25 mo.
o
(Put
Credit and Call Credit Spread Premiums not calculated into results)
-
ASX
(Tech) – in @ $5.81 (currently $6.62), 14%
increase / 1.75 mo.
-
FET
(Energy) – in @ $30.53 (currently $34.79), 15%
increase / 1.75 mo.
-
GTAT (Tech) – in @ $18.09 (currently $16.05), -11% increase / 0.5 mo.
-
HK
(Energy) – in @ $5.25 – (currently $6.78), 29%
increase / 1.75 mo.
-
KOG (Energy) – in @ $12.98 – (currently $14.23),
10% increase / 1 mo.
-
LSCC (Tech) – in @ $7.85 – (currently $8.10),
3% increase / 0.75 mo.
-
LSG (Gold) – in @ $0.92 – (currently $0.1.19),
29% increase / 0.5 mo.
-
PQ
(Energy) – in @ $5.87 – (currently $6.92), 18%
increase / 1.75 mo.
-
RFMD
(Tech) – in @ $7.96 – (currently $9.63), 21% increase / 1.75 mo.
-
SLV (Silver) – in @ $20.17 – (currently $20.57),
2% increase / 0.5 mo.
-
SPIL
(Tech) – in @ 7.20 – (currently $8.28), 15%
increase / 1.75 mo.
-
STKL
(Energy) – in @ 13.35 – (currently $13.70), 3%
increase / 0.5 mo.
-
SIL (Silver) – in at 24.51 - (currently 14.70)
– no stop,
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently
128.78) – no stop ($1,339 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 20.57)
– no stop ($21.48 per physical ounce).
To
follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is:
taylorpamm.
Please
be safe out there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed
thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly
economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, R.F.
Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .
Please
write to Mr. Culbertson at: <rfc@culbertsons.com> to inform him of any
reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in
complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference <rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If
you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of his thoughts -
please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm" is the handle.
If
you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel
free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To
unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.
Views
expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be
construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and
is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other
firms or associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note:
Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents
only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST
RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT
TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES,
AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Alternative
investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a
substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund
and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts;
the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could
mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no
secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and
none is expected to develop.
All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to
its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any
funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>