This Week in Barrons –
6-2-2013
Are We Healed?
Factually:
-
The
initial jobless claims rose by 10K to 354K, which is really bad. But if the jobs picture stinks, it keeps The
Ben Bernanke's foot on the gas, and that's all Wall Street wants.
-
Last
month’s viewership of CNBC fell to levels not seen since 2005.
-
The
Case Schiller housing index showed that home values in some areas had risen
over 20% YOY (year over year).
-
Consumer
confidence came in at 76.2 beating the estimates of 71 quite handily.
-
The
Richmond Fed manufacturing index came in at -2 (contracting), and the wages
dropped to a one year low, new orders fell to below January levels, employment
went negative, and the workweek contracted.
-
The
Dallas Fed reported a manufacturing index of -10.5 (worse than expected) for a
state that we all thought was booming – yes?
-
And 48
million Americans are still on food stamps.
When economic reports start to show
something that resembles economic growth, I lift my eyebrows and ponder the
idea that some form of healing is taking place. But let’s look inside housing figures because
unemployment is still raging, and most of the jobs that were created were in
services, hospitality, and food delivery. I’m wondering how someone working for $10.50
an hour has the money to buy a $200K home? If a bank needs 20% down, then our $10.50
an hour worker would have to put every single penny of his income into a
savings account for over two years. And
assuming that people on food stamps cannot purchase a house, this means that an
additional 15.2% of the U.S. population is automatically excluded from the
housing market. Ah – but the key to
housing seems to be investment money.
For example, Blackrock is buying 20,000 homes at a clip. It doesn't take long to buy every single $100k
to $190k house in an area if ONE investor is buying 20,000 of them.
Now, housing serves two purposes,
and they do not necessarily coincide.
(1) For someone looking to enjoy their life, raise a family, and feel
good about building equity in an asset – buying a home makes a lot of
sense. You get the mortgage deduction. You have a bit of security. And you build equity in the asset
itself. All that said, housing is an
investment unequaled in the history of building wealth. One of my favorite lines has always been: “A
good way to get rich is to own many homes and let someone else pay for them (via
rent).” And then because of inflation,
you can sell them (as you need to) in order to create a nice income stream. So housing can be a home, or it can be a true
investment.
However, when housing is gaining 20%
a year (and in certain areas we’re hearing of bidding wars again), at what
point does the word ‘bubble’ resurface? Interestingly,
what the TV reporters didn't tell you was that if you take out the ‘distressed’
sales (foreclosures, short sales, etc.) the rise in housing prices was only 5%
YOY. However, I am puzzled to explain
how lumber prices have fallen 30% off their highs? What are they building all these homes with? And this week we heard that the mortgage
applications fell 8.8% - after falling 9.8% last month. So how are houses selling fairly well?
This week Carrington came out and
told us that they were ending their ‘buying of houses and turning them into
rentals’ campaign – because they are not getting the return that they expected
for the 25,000 rentals that they have accumulated. Over at Colony American Homes, they have
purchased 9,950 houses for over a $1Billion to rehab and rent out, but have
only found tenants for 51% of those rentals.
Goldman Sachs estimates that investors have purchased approximately 14
million ‘leased’ single-family residences that are worth an estimated $2.8
Trillion. If all these investors decide that
they would rather sell their houses (than try and rent them profitably), we are
going to see a wave of homes come to market that rivals the 2008 foreclosure
mess.
So, are we healed? We know the Fed has placed over $3+ Trillion
dollars with banks, trying to make them whole, and hoping that it would all
trickle down via loans. Unfortunately banks
are not machines, and banks have done what is best for banks – not necessarily
what is best for the economy. Pour in a
little greed and manipulation, and you get a very different outcome than what may
have been planned. Bankers got rich, and
small pockets of the economy received a stimulus. However, the overall effect has been more of a
distortion than anything else. Never
before have the 1% gotten so rich, while the 99% continue to struggle to eat.
The talk now is that the Fed is
going to "taper" off its QE. Along with that discussion, there is talk that
someone else is going to get selected to run the Fed as The Ben Bernanke may soon
step down. The analysts are saying that
if the Fed tapers, it is bullish for everything – because it shows that the
economy is firing well enough to take off on its own. I tend to think that there is some real
whistling past the graveyard going on here. If $3 Trillion in Fed money has the Dallas manufacturing
index at a minus 10.5 after almost 6 years, how is cutting QE going to fix it? If durable goods are selling slowing with
interest rates at historic lows, how will higher interest rates spur
sales? If 48 million people are on food
stamps now, how does reducing Fed money get them off food stamps? If all these so called housing sales grind to
a halt because investors are choking on them, how does that help the economy?
Today, my youngest son will graduate
from high school. I want desperately to
believe he's got a shot at a tremendous career, and a bountiful life. I want him to have all the things that I've
been blessed with. I want to believe
that the Fed has solved the problems, the economy is really fixed, and great
opportunities lie at his feet. But alas,
I feel we're in a decade of long struggle, and there are going to be a lot more
dislocations to deal with. I feel he's
got a lot of wind in his face as he embarks on his move into college and his
ultimate career path.
The economy is not healed. Housing is being driven by speculation first,
desperation second. Manufacturing is
limping along, while handouts grow exponentially. Companies are buying back stock for their
short-term gains, and ignoring the process of establishing long-term expansion
and renewal. If the Fed does try and
pull back from its QE programs, there's no growth to fill the void, and things
will get ugly very quickly. I truly wish
it wasn’t so.
The Market...
We came into the Holiday shortened
week on Tuesday, and they made it 20 consecutive ‘up’ Tuesdays in a row. On Tuesday the market was up 200 points early
– so we sold our DIA calls for a gambler’s profit.
One of the long running adages of
the market is that you're best off to sell in May and "go away". Meaning, that for the most part the market
does most of its gains between October and April. This has indeed been historically accurate,
but like most things it isn't 100%. And
this May did not keep to the script, as it ended the month up from where it
started. But this May is so completely
dislocated from historical norms that you can't pin any type of age-old adage
to it. And honestly, you can't really look at the entire year with anything but
skepticism. We've simply seen too many bizarre market moves that defy
reality. We haven't had a 10% correction
in months. 20 Tuesdays in a row have
been up, accumulating almost 78% of all the market gains.
Last week I started
"feeling" that something was changing. Maybe it was the insanity that is Japan, as
their bond market has been halted a dozen times for strange imbalances. Or maybe it is the increasing drumbeat of
"QE tapering" that TV is trying to scare into me. Maybe it is the fact that the lies are so
deep, and the disconnects so wide, that people are becoming fearful. Even someone with a grade school education can’t
reconcile soaring housing prices – linked with lumber and iron ore prices down
30%. The math just doesn’t add up.
Lately, the most ink is being
spilled over QE, and the market’s reaction to “removing the punch bowl.”
TV is trying to convince me that it will be fine, no worries. They say the economy is improving to the point
where tapering off is a good thing. But
those of us in the real world simply ask the obvious: if we are posting such
horrific economic numbers while enjoying the Fed pushing $85 Billion a month into
the system, how is this going to stand on its own when/if it is removed? I content that it cannot.
Calling any form of a
"top" in this market has been suicide. Just when we set up for a picture book
correction, they rush in and force it higher, burning the shorts to
death. Yet we know that nothing can just go straight up for ever.
It might seem that way, but even Japan’s famous run from 9,000 to 45,000 ended
in a two decade long struggle that brought it down to 9,000 again. The only question is: When?
I am not calling a top here. I'm honestly scared to even consider the word
"correction", since they've short-circuited every correction since
November of 2012. But all that said we are once again set up for a
meaningful pull back. The stochastics
are rolling over, and the transports and the utility sector are hanging by a
thread. If this were any other period of
time, you could look at the data and declare: "We are in for a 10%
correction". But today, it’s all
about The Ben Bernanke.
For example, in the entire month of
June, there will only be two days without POMO (Permanent Open Market
Operations). In other words, the Fed is
going to inject billions of dollars into the system virtually every single day
of June. Can we really get a normal 10%
correction with that kind of stimulus going on in the background? Thus far the answer has been no.
I think this is a good time to sit
on your hands and do a lot of nothing. While
they might rescue this correction and push us right back up, I need to see the
S&P get over 1675 for a clear break to new highs. Between here (S&P at 1630) and there,
virtually anything could happen. We
could chop sideways, or actually fall through 1620 and go down and visit the
50-day moving average down at 1600.
Safety right now is key. Keep your powder dry and wait to play another
day.
Tips:
We sold out of our DIA
Calls on Tuesday at the open – for a nice 67% gain. Wow – 67% over a holiday weekend. You have to love the 20th
consecutive up Tuesday! This week I did
take:
- C @ 53.03 (currently
51.95) – sold out flat,
-
XLF @ 20.20 (currently 19.80) – sold out flat, and
-
CCJ @ 21.80 (currently 21.72) – sold out flat.
My current short-term holds are:
- ABX @ 20.20 (currently
21.16) – stop at entry,
-
SIL – in at 24.51 (currently 14.34) – no stop yet
-
GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 134.12) – no stop
($1,392.60 per physical ounce), AND
-
SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 21.45) – no stop
($22.22 per physical ounce).
To follow me on
Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm.
Please be safe out
there!
Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts
proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic
newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF
Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews. You can learn more and get your free
subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
.
Please write to <rfc@getabby.com>
to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be
reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference
<rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>.
If you'd like to view
RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to
sign up as a Twitter follower - "taylorpamm"
is my handle.
If you'd like to see
RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the
TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0
To unsubscribe please
refer to the bottom of the email.
Views expressed are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way
as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a
testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or
associations. Mr.
Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers. This message may contain information
that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or
entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any
alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied
by a prospectus or similar offering document. Past performance is not indicative of
future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end
of each article.
Note: Joining BARRONS
REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions
of RF Culbertson and Associates.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT
INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS
INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES
MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY
REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE
UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT
MANAGER.
Alternative investment
performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount
of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account
managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of
a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of
diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary
market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is
expected to develop.
All material presented
herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson
and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.
R.F. Culbertson
<mailto:rfc@getabby.com>
<http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com>
