RF's Financial News

RF's Financial News

Sunday, September 16, 2012

This Week in Barrons 9-16-2012


This Week in Barrons – 9-16-2012

“I Hope this was a Plan that just Came Together.” … Almost A-Team
This week – one by one – the pieces of the puzzle were manipulated into place and the picture emerged.  It started with Mario Draghi saying he would do "What ever it takes" to keep the Euro together.  Then the German courts stepped up to give their blessing by voting yes to the ESM.  Finally The Ben Bernanke exceeded all expectations by saying that he’d print another $40 Billion a month (focusing on the housing market), and will do even more if the economy doesn't improve!

A while back I posted a study showing that 50% of the market’s gains have come within 2 days of an FOMC meeting and announcement.  So factually – remove about 20 days a year – and you remove 50% of the market’s gains.  With the DOW sitting about 600 points from its all time high – you need to ask yourself – is this a true reflection of the economy?  After all:
       jobs stink,
       47 million people are on food stamps,
       inflation is roaring,
-        CD's are paying 3/4 of a percent,
       economic activity is below sluggish (basically in recession),
       and yet we are nearing ALL TIME highs in the stock market.

This shows that the stock market has little to do with the economy, and the market’s movement has nothing to do with fundamentals.  For example: on the very same day that 384K people signed up for initial jobless benefits (1st time unemployment), which should have sent the market down – we roared higher for 200+ points due to ‘free money’ from the Fed.   

What you saw was the: “We’re All In” roll of the dice.  Between the ECB in Europe, the FOMC in the U.S., and the stimulus/infrastructure spending in China, the world is going to be blanketed in cash.  And when The Ben Bernanke was asked about inflation he said: “Food is soaring because of the drought, and oil is soaring because of global events and demand.”  Sorry, materials are soaring because our Fed is purposefully destroying whatever infinitesimally small value the dollar has.  Companies will correspondingly want more dollars for their products because dollars are going to be worth less as the days go on – and the spiral begins.

So what happens now?  The answer to that question isn’t as simple as it was a month ago.  On one hand you could think that the markets and the economy would continue higher, but since none of this currency printing addresses the structural issues (along with the overwhelming debt) it will all come to a head in the near future when we will crash again.  BUT – never in the history of the world have Central Bankers been able to coordinate massive money printing like they can now.  That is a game changer.  Consider the number of times that you have heard that the “Fed is out of bullets”, and “There’s not much left that the Fed can do”.  What do you mean the Fed is out of bullets?  The Fed (like Europe and China) has become a gigantic printing press, that can print as much currency as they want, and are therefore NEVER out of bullets.  We’ve entered an Economic Twilight Zone where ALL of the old rules are out the window. 

In the past (think Weimar Germany and Argentina), if a Country printed money, their currency became worthless on the global stage, and eventually it would implode upon itself and go belly up.  But, what happens if the entire globe starts running the printing presses wide open?  In the end, the entire world defaults, the currency markets would shut down, and a Global "reset" would be announced, along with a new global currency installed.  But until that time, anything and everything is possible.  Until then, all any of us can do is continue with our precious metals, work the equity markets to our advantage, and transform as many dollar gains into “material holdings” as we can.  We've entered a very strange time for sure, and I can think of no other thing to do.

The Market...
Over the past days I’ve received many congratulatory e-mails concerning my QE3 prediction – and to that end I say thank you.  This week we came into the FOMC meeting with some long side trades, but we surely were not loaded to capacity. There was the uncertainty that The Ben Bernanke could disappoint, so we kept some powder dry for another day. 

The Fed then announced their detailed plans, and the Europeans will surely follow.   Since markets don't function on fundamentals any more, and banks really don't want to lend money any more, the money has to go somewhere.  Will the banks channel these new funds into Bonds?  Doubtful – because why buy bonds that pay 1.5% interest, when they can run with the market and make billions?  It’s my feeling that a large portion of this money will work its way into the stock market.  

I disagree with the Fed’s decision to continue quantitative easing.  Quantitative easing is basically printing money to decrease the rate on yield-bearing assets.  As the Fed purchases these assets, the yield on these assets decreases which (hopefully) trickles through the economy allowing businesses and individuals to take out credit at favorable rates.  The Fed then hopes that businesses and individuals will increase borrowing and consumption.  This works if money actually moves within the economy.  But, if individuals are not interested in purchasing a home (for example), or can’t get a mortgage (due to stringent lending requirements), or businesses are not seeking to invest – then cheaper money doesn’t matter.  A measurement of how money is actually moving in the economy is called the “Velocity” of money.  Factually, the ‘Velocity’ has DECREASED by 25% (and is continuing to decrease) since 2008.  So no matter how you examine it – money simply isn't moving as quickly as it needs to within the U.S. economy.  This decrease in velocity signals that the current QE program is not going to fix the current economic situation.

Now market-wise – the market is not a voting machine in which the masses decide the winners and losers, but rather it is a weighting machine in which the quantity of money is the sole arbiter of price.  The market has cheered all of the QE programs announced by the Federal Reserve, despite their failure to significantly generate jobs or promote growth.  For this reason, I am long the market as I would rather be upset about the monetary situation of the nation and making money, than upset and losing money.  

My guess is that we are going to challenge the 2007 all time highs, and I suspect there's a good chance we actually break above them.  The only issue is that markets often inflict the most pain before they allow reward.  What would prevent the markets from pulling a fast 5% pull back to confuse people, and then turn around and push toward the upper limit?  Nothing at all.  In fact, it's the way Wall Street works.  Therefore, don't be surprised if we see some weakness, simply because it's designed to confuse you and shake your confidence.  Moving ahead we'll be looking to add on dips – instead of chasing things higher.  We think the pump is primed, and Bernanke loves a rising market.

As an aside:  if the political polls in early October show the President behind Romney in key swing states like Ohio and especially Florida, a desperate President Obama may try to turn things around by doing what only a President can do.  He could order an attack on Iran, or co-ordinate an attack with Israel.  The election would suddenly then be about the war.  The President's spin-artists would try to make the November 6th vote a referendum pitting a businessman and his budget-geek running mate – against the Commander-in-Chief who killed Bin Laden and took out Iran's nukes.  So don't be surprised if one morning in the not-too-distant future you see pictures of smoke pouring from (what used to be) Iran's nuclear factories.

Tips:

In general terms the inflationary areas like oil and materials are the ones that run the best when the printing presses are running.  But that old adage could crack some, because the bankers now know that it's really not about fundamentals and inflation any more – so other areas such as technology and financials could also be big winners going forward.  In terms of what within each of the sectors do I like:
-       GLD (Gold ETF) is an old favorite of mine – I prefer the physical metal – but I like the trade none the less – you will get resistance in the mid 170’s – but if/when it breaks free …
-       SLV  (Silver ETF) is also a favorite (like the physical metal as well) – resistance will be in the mid to high 30’s – but all time high is near 50 – so room to run there.
-       GDX / and GDXJ (Miner and Junior Miner ETF’s) – extremely beaten down sector – but play with caution.

Thanks to DS for other materials selections such as SLX (Steel) and USO (Oil) – both interesting and can easily do well in inflationary times.

Currently I’m holding:
-       GDX – in at 42.50 (currently 53.87) – stop at 52.00
-       SPY – in at 142.54 (currently 146.97) – stop at 144.50
-       SBUX in at 48.88 (currently 50.53) – stop at 50.10
-       LOW – in at 28.02 (currently 29.28) – stop at entry
-       MRO – in at 28.13 (currently 31.09) – stop at entry
-       NTAP – in at 35.13 (currently 35.81) – stop at entry
-       IBM – in at 198.34 (currently 206.81) – stop at 203.00
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 171.87) – no stop ($1,769.80 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 33.59) – no stop ($34.60 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! 

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@getabby.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference .

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson



Sunday, September 9, 2012

This Week in Barrons - 9-9-2012


This Week in Barrons – 9-9-2012

Dr. Doom ‘n Gloom – That’s Me!

We stand just a few short months away from what many people are calling the most important election of our country’s life.  On the surface it seems to show a clear separation of the parties.  The Democrats w/ President Obama stand for ‘shared prosperity’ (socialism, big government, etc.), with the Republicans and Governor Romney standing for ‘individualism.’  Over the past 40 years we've had ample supply of both sides, yet we are still at a time when:
-      -  47 million people are on food stamps,
-      -  the labor force participation rate for men is the lowest since 1948,
-      -  70% of the current job openings pay less than $10 per hour,
-      -  our houses are viewed as liabilities instead of assets, and
-      -  hamburger prices have reached an all time high.

But the economy is just the symptom of a very insidious disease.  What got us into this position?  We Americans are amazing when something bad happens.  No nation on earth will band together neighbor-to-neighbor and pitch in to help, like in the US.  No nation has been so profoundly technologically advanced, so far ahead of the curve.  Yet – we are still a nation of sheep – willing (and often wanting) to be lead.  I don’t think it really much matters WHO wins the election – because an economic disaster is set in motion and will not be stopped.
-      -  Debt problems don't go away by borrowing more money.
-      -  Jobs won't magically appear by increasing or decreasing taxes.
-      -  You can’t fix or improve a health care system by absorbing millions more (non-paying customers) into an already stressed system.

I sat through two conventions waiting for someone to talk about how relocating manufacturing, and creating so much red tape (via EPA, DEP, CAFRA, etc.) have lead to our current predicament – but alas not a peep.  Unfortunately the economic fallout is coming, and cannot be stopped.  But, we can ‘kick the can’ further down the road.  The $64 million question is: How ugly will the situation get?  Almost daily we hear of military operations in towns across America.  We see more and more cameras and drones watching our every move.  We see laws being passed that allow you to be stopped, arrested and held without representation, without court ordered papers, just "suspicion'.  You have to at least consider the idea that Uncle Sam is preparing daily for social unrest.  Imagine what would happen to the inner cities if the EBT (welfare) cards wouldn’t work?  Imagine what would happened if banks wouldn’t open one day, or credit cards declined.  We are in uncharted territory.
-       Never in the history of the world have so many Countries gone broke at the very same time.
-       Never before has the global financial scene had debt loads in the multi-trillions, not to mention the derivative time bomb, where some $700 trillion has been pledged and pledged again against the same assets.

I have gone on record saying that there would be a coordinated Central Bank push, with both sides of the Atlantic embarking on a money-printing orgy.  We had a good start this week when Mario Draghi released his plan for "open ended buying of bonds".  Now, if the Germans vote yes (on the 12th) for going along with the plan, and then Bernanke gives us more on the 13th – we should be good to go.  However, little did I know the Chinese would join the party this week by announcing a massive infrastructure project including bridges, highways, water systems, a Port system, and 25 urban railroad projects.  So we now have the real distinct possibility of three continents joining in the stimulus effort.

My point remains the same.  If Bernanke, the ECB and China unleash massive stimulus via their various programs, it will indeed spur economic activity.  But unfortunately it has no staying power.  More debt, placed upon an already un-payable debt burden, just brings the pin ever closer to the balloon.  It's the aftermath that bothers me – so just call me Dr. Doom ‘n Gloom.

The Market:
Okay, they fired off the stage-one rocket boosters on Thursday, when Mario Draghi announced Europe’s plan to buy up Government bonds.  Then China (who has been slowing over the past several months) announced a massive $158 billion spending spree on railways, roads, ports, etc. – therefore the market held onto the previous days gains.  If the Germans (on the 12th) go along with the program, we'll see another market gain.  And finally (on the 13th) The Ben Bernanke gets to join in with more QE/Stimulus from the U.S.  With all of that new money in the system – the market should move higher and higher.   

There is a chance that the Germans don't go along with the party, and/or The Ben Bernanke doesn't give us something substantial – in which case the markets could rollover – which is why we have not gone ‘all in’.  I don't want to be loaded to the hilt here ahead of what could be a wild Wednesday and Thursday.

I still think that the Germans vote to go along with the program.  Not because they like it, but because not going with it would most definitely signal the end of the Euro as we know it.  They could very easily look at it as the lesser of two very big evils.  I'm also still thinking that The Ben Bernanke announces something on the 13th.  Therefore, the stars are aligned for a big-time pop higher.  I do not think that this will be a "sell the news" type of event.

However, gaming it by getting too long ahead of this is dangerous.  I’m waiting to put the bulk of my funds to work AFTER I know all the details.  I'm suggesting a straddle play in the TIPS section – that you can certainly use on virtually any holding.

The Gold market also smells something big.  It's one thing when gold increases a few dollars a day, but $25 and $30 daily gains suggest that some inflation is coming our way in rather large doses.  Silver has also been on a fast ride higher – despite JPM loading up on the short side of the ledger.  Can JPM really beat the silver price down again with all those paper shorts?  I guess it's possible, but if the stimulus announced this week is big enough, I think they've lost control and it will challenge the old silver highs relatively soon.  

There’s a wild week coming.  I'm excited (not to see more fiat money), but to see how the markets react to all of this.  One thing I can guarantee – this will NOT be a boring week in the markets.

Tips:
We continue to appreciate in our trading accounts – DS writes me with some bio-tech picks of: XBI breaking out, BIOT in another up-trend, ISIS, ARIA, and PCYC with a significantly raised price target. 

If you own Apple (for example), you may think of straddling the stock. One-way to do this is by selling the October $700 calls (trading around $15.50) and buying the October $650 puts (trading around $14.25).  In other words, you protect your downside, make a little money, and have a good shot at holding on to the stock if the price move to the upside isn't explosive.

Currently I’m holding:
-      -  GDX – in at 42.50 (currently 50.55) – stop at 49.00
-      -  SPY – in at 142.54 (currently 144.41) – stop at 143.00
-      -  SBUX in at 48.88 (currently 51.03) – stop at 50.10
-      -  LOW – in at 28.02 (currently 28.32) – stop at entry
-      -  MRO – in at 28.13 (currently 28.60) – stop at entry
-      -  NTAP – in at 35.13 (currently 35.80) – stop at entry
-      -  IBM – in at 198.34 (currently 199.25) – stop at entry
-      -  GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 168.60) – no stop ($1,737.50 per physical ounce), AND
-      -  SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 32.73) – no stop ($33.63 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! 

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@getabby.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference .

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson



Sunday, September 2, 2012

This Week in Barrons - 9-1-2012


This Week in Barrons – 9-1-2012

7 Trillion Dollars – Yum – Yum…

Last week I made waves when I suggested that the recent Sentinel court ruling is the door opener for financial institutions to co-mingle customer funds with their proprietary trading desks – play cowboy with your money – and if they lose it – “Too Bad” – they are not on the hook.  All they have to say is that they used your money to make you even more money, it went bad, and it was lost.  No fraud, no foul, no illegality.  Last week people asked me:
1.    – If I was serious?
2.    – If I believed it?
3.    – And why would the court open the floodgates for institutions to co-mingle funds?

My answers are:
1.  - Yes, I’m serious.
2.  - Yes, I do believe it.
3.  - It’s all about the money.  With over $7 Trillion (about 50% of our total deficit) sitting in pension funds and 401K's – if they can get their hands on it, they will. 

Right now Obama is locked in a fight for his job, and he's beginning to sweat.  Anyone that's not on the Governments payroll is tired of the rhetoric, and is not better off than 4 years ago.  The Anti-Obama movie "2016" has been selling out across the country.  Currently most people figure that "it must be really rich people that lost their money, so it's not my problem".  Well my prediction is that at some point we’re going to hear about "everyday folks" losing their retirement to co-mingled funds.  Then Uncle Sam is going to say: “It’s time to stop playing in the Wall Street Casino and come over to the USA Retirement Program.  All employer/employee retirement money will now become part of our program."

This concept was initiated between 2007 and 2010.  The Government was broke, the banksters had taken down the financial system, and they were looking everywhere for money.  Everyday the Unions would come to Obama and tell them that their pensions were underfunded.  The market crash had taken a lot of people from ‘Hero to Zero’ in a very short time.  So the calls went out to find cash.  What they found was $6 Trillion in 401K's and Roth IRA's – mostly sitting there almost forgotten.  And it was Vice President Joe Biden that floated the idea of a "Guaranteed Retirement Account" (GRA), in the February 2010 "Middle Class Report".  The report outlines how the government was going to force our retirement funds into a Government-Run Mandatory Plan. 

Even before that, Teresa Ghilarducci (an economist) wrote a paper in 2007 called “Agenda for Shared Prosperity”, that she presented to the Economic Policy Institute in Washington.  In that paper she outlined her ideal plan for these "Guaranteed Retirement Accounts".  She proposed that our current system is failing, too few people are in 401K’s and taxes are straining the elderly.  Therefore, a "Guaranteed Retirement Account" (run by Uncle Sam) that forces you to donate to the program is a way of solving things. To quote:  "Contributions equal to 5% of earnings are deducted along with payroll taxes and credited to individual accounts administered by the Social Security Administration. The cost of contributions is split equally between employer and employee. Mandatory contributions are deducted on earnings up to the Social Security earnings cap".
 
The problem with the Biden proposal (as you might expect) was that the Republicans fought back – telling the government to “keep your hands off our people's retirement money".   Well, when the front door is locked – find the back door.  I believe that this is why the Sentinel Court case was not some ‘off the wall’, one time mistake.  Ever since February of 2010 (when the idea of a Government sponsored retirement account first surfaced), our government has been fixated on getting that pool of money.

So if the Republicans won't let them just take it without a fight, and the population doesn't really trust Uncle Sam (but doesn't trust Wall Street either), you can see what they've decided to do.  Let Wall Street rape J.Q. Public enough that J.Q. Public will come to Uncle Sam begging for safety.
-       This is why the court found nothing wrong with Sentinel.
-       This is why John Corzine was allowed to take a billion customer dollars and roll the dice.
-       This is why Bernie Madoff’s billions are still unfound. 

They've allowed the market go crazy, so they can come out and declare that the average person should not have their money in a 401K (where bad things can happen to it), but rather let Uncle Sam take care of it for you.  Once we get this next round of QE/Stimulus, and we see the coordinated global push and take advantage of it – my remaining 401K’s and IRA’s will be liquidated and converted to physical assets.  As far the trading accounts go – there’s always been a risk to them.  They aren't FDIC protected, and all we’re hoping there is to be one step ahead.

I know that what I just wrote is scary, and could be written off as the musings of a madman, but before you go there – remember this same government just FORCED you to buy health insurance or be taxed by the 16,000 new IRS agents that were recently hired.

The Market...
Once again some jawboning from The Ben Bernanke saved the market from really melting down this week.  He stated (from Jackson Hole, Wyoming) that indeed he is poised to "do more" if the economy doesn't show any signs of perking up.  I feel that the ‘more’ is coming on September 13th.  The FOMC has a two-day meeting on the 12th and the 13th, and that allows them to see a handful of important things.  First, we will have seen the most recent non-farm payroll report.  Secondly, we will then know about the ECB bank meeting.  And third, the German vote on the constitutionality of going along with the ESM program will be announced on the 12th.

There are many ways that this can play out:
-       If the Germans agree to the ESM plan, AND The Ben Bernanke announces something big on the 13th with QE3, we're going to get a big time rally that could easily test the all time highs by year-end.
-       If the Germans hold tight and vote against the ESM, but The Ben Bernanke still lets loose with QE3, we will still rally – we just won’t get as far.
-       BUT, if we don't get anything out of either – we’re going to see a drop of 20% or more in a big hurry. 

Honestly, it’s not really all that often when we know (in advance) that a big move is on the table.  We all should take advantage of this by playing both sides of the coin.  The market IS going to move up or down significantly.  I'm leaning towards up, but I'm not willing to take a one side trade on that, no thanks.  Let’s discuss next time the ‘straddles’ and ‘strangles’ required to best position our portfolios ahead of the move.

Tips:
We made some nice gains and cashed out this week on:  SPY, SNDK, and TTWO.  I’m currently watching VRSN over 48, NTAP over 35.12, CLF on a double bottom bounce over 37.50, and AUY over 17 – all seem interesting to me.    

Currently I’m holding:
-       GDX – in at 42.50 (currently 47.96) – stop at 47.00
-       LOW in at 28.02 (currently 28.48) – stop at entry
-       SBUX in at 48.88 (currently 49.61) – stop at 49.10
-       GLD (ETF for Gold) – in at 158.28, (currently 164.22) – no stop ($1,684.60 per physical ounce), AND
-       SLV (ETF for Silver) – in at 28.3 (currently 30.84) – no stop ($31.37 per physical ounce).

To follow me on Twitter and get my daily thoughts and trades – my handle is: taylorpamm. 

Please be safe out there! 

Disclaimer:
Expressed thoughts proffered within the BARRONS REPORT, a Private and free weekly economic newsletter, are those of noted entrepreneur, professor and author, RF Culbertson, contributing sources and those he interviews.  You can learn more and get your free subscription by visiting: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com> .

Please write to <rfc@getabby.com> to inform me of any reproductions, including when and where copy will be reproduced. You may use in complete form or, if quoting in brief, reference .

If you'd like to view RF's actual stock trades - and see more of my thoughts - please feel free to sign up as a Twitter follower -  "taylorpamm" is my handle.

If you'd like to see RF in action - teaching people about investing - please feel free to view the TED talk that he gave on Fearless Investing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z9I_6ciH0

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

Views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest and is not in any way a testimony of, or associated with Mr. Culbertson's other firms or associations.  Mr. Culbertson and related parties are not registered and licensed brokers.  This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and does not constitute an offer for or advice about any alternative investment product. Such advice can only be made when accompanied by a prospectus or similar offering document.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Please make sure to review important disclosures at the end of each article.

Note: Joining BARRONS REPORT is not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of RF Culbertson and Associates.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS) AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES MAY INCREASE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS; MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop.

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Culbertson and/or the staff may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.

Remember the Blog: <http://rfcfinancialnews.blogspot.com/>
Until next week – be safe.

R.F. Culbertson